资源与生态学报

陈利伟, 蔺晓红

资源与生态学报, 2025, 16(5): 1528-1539. DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2025.05.023

Model	Beta	T	P	Adjusted R²	SD
Morphological difference	0.517	0.362	0.009	0.208	1.126
Material integration	0.522	0.497	0.008	0.223	1.116
Functional interaction	0.549	1.187	<0.001	0.142	1.106

Table 8 Regression model fit statistics (N=560)

本文的其它图/表

Figure 1 Diagram of the triangular fuzzy number membership degree
Figure 2 Diagram of the membership degree and fuzzy semantic relationships
Figure 3 Fuzzy semantic relationship model of the impact of bionic design features on the emotional resonance and ecological identity of residents
Table 1 Questionnaire design for bionic design features
Table 2 Questionnaire design for the emotional resonance and ecological identity of residents
Table 3 Demographic descriptive statistics
Table 4 Reliability analysis of bionic design features and the resident perceptions questionnaire
Table 5 Descriptive statistics of bionic design features (N=560)
Table 6 Descriptive statistics of the emotional resonance and ecological identity of residents (N=560)
Figure 4 Membership degree and fuzzy semantic relationships of Q3-8
Figure 5 Membership degree and fuzzy semantic relationships of Q3-10
Table 7 The Chi-square test results for the association between design features and the emotional resonance and ecological identification of residents
Table 9 ANOVA results for the effects of bionic design features on the emotional resonance and ecological identity of residents