资源与生态学报

图/表详细信息

陈利伟, 蔺晓红

资源与生态学报, 2025, 16(5): 1528-1539. DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2025.05.023

Design feature	Morphological difference		Material integration		Functional interaction
Design feature	X²	P	X²	P	X²	P
Q3-1	17.430	0.002	24.376	0.005	48.988	<0.001
Q3-2	17.901	0.002	20.975	0.008	14.591	0.006
Q3-3	24.930	0.006	31.737	0.006	13.618	0.008
Q3-4	17.751	0.009	20.984	0.009	45.149	0.007
Q3-5	23.707	0.007	29.938	<0.001	17.737	0.005
Q3-6	14.600	0.007	19.025	0.003	18.279	0.003
Q3-7	15.362	0.009	17.441	0.006	31.998	0.008
Q3-8	12.919	0.001	10.536	<0.001	6.304	0.001
Q3-9	17.751	0.009	20.984	0.009	45.149	0.007
Q3-10	25.181	0.002	40.650	0.004	15.513	<0.001

Table 7 The Chi-square test results for the association between design features and the emotional resonance and ecological identification of residents

本文的其它图/表

Figure 1 Diagram of the triangular fuzzy number membership degree
Figure 2 Diagram of the membership degree and fuzzy semantic relationships
Figure 3 Fuzzy semantic relationship model of the impact of bionic design features on the emotional resonance and ecological identity of residents
Table 1 Questionnaire design for bionic design features
Table 2 Questionnaire design for the emotional resonance and ecological identity of residents
Table 3 Demographic descriptive statistics
Table 4 Reliability analysis of bionic design features and the resident perceptions questionnaire
Table 5 Descriptive statistics of bionic design features (N=560)
Table 6 Descriptive statistics of the emotional resonance and ecological identity of residents (N=560)
Figure 4 Membership degree and fuzzy semantic relationships of Q3-8
Figure 5 Membership degree and fuzzy semantic relationships of Q3-10
Table 8 Regression model fit statistics (N=560)
Table 9 ANOVA results for the effects of bionic design features on the emotional resonance and ecological identity of residents

模态框（Modal）标题

图/表 详细信息

图/表详细信息