Research Articles

China’s Food Safety Institutional Reform: Evaluation Issues

  • 1. School of Environment and Natural Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100875, China;
    2. School of Public Health, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning 530021, China

Received date: 2017-09-14

  Revised date: 2017-12-02

  Online published: 2018-01-26

Supported by

FORHEAD with funding from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF)


China’s compartmentalized food safety supervision and administration system has long been blamed for recurring food safety incidents. In response, the State Council launched a major institutional reform that aimed to realize whole-chain-based food safety supervision and administration, to strengthen grassroots capacity and to adapt to a society that is complex, risk prone, open and pluralistic. According to the State Council’s mandate, the institutional restructuring at various local levels should have been completed by the end of 2013. However, there have been no systematic, open evaluations that have examined progress, effectiveness or effects. This study attempts to explore issues concerning evaluation of the institutional reform: how to understand the role of evaluation in the policy cycle? What are important evaluation questions in different phases of the policy cycle? How to identify evaluation priorities? Specifically, a target group effectiveness evaluation framework was established and applied in Guangzhou city to assess how local government departments responded to the three principal mandates of the State Council’s reforms: integration of mechanisms and functions, integration of resources, and the enhancement of regulatory capability. The results show that such an evaluation framework is a valid way to examine the main goals and components of the reform, but that the indicators and evaluation criteria need be made more context-specific.

Cite this article

WANG Shuangshuang, ZHANG Lei, HU Zhen . China’s Food Safety Institutional Reform: Evaluation Issues[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018 , 9(1) : 39 -49 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.01.005


[1] Antle J M. 1999. Benefits and costs of food safety regulation. Food Policy, 24(6): 605-623.
[2] Cheng L. 2008. Review of Chinese food safety development and measures for improvement. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 10: 229-232. (in Chinese).
[3] China Food and Drug Administration. 2017. Open Suggestions on National Food Safety Demonstration City Assessment and Management Measures (revised version) and National Food Safety Demonstration City Criteria (revised version). 177251.html, accessed on December 19, 2017 (in Chinese).
[4] Crabbe A., Leroy P. 2008. The Handbook of Environmental Policy Evaluation, Earthscan.
[5] Ding D. 2013. Opportunities and challenges facing China’s food safety supervision and administration system. Party & Government Forum, (11): 29-31 (in Chinese).
[6] European Environmental Agency. 2001. Reporting on environmental measures: are we being effective? Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
[7] He MH. 2012. Problems in grassroots food hygiene supervision and counter measures. Chinese Manipulation & Qi Gong Therapy, 3(6): 227-228. (in Chinese).
[8] Hu YL. 2013. Prospect of local food administration reform. Chinese Cadres Tribune, 7: 72-74. (in Chinese).
[9] Hu YL, Xu JY. 2013. Interpretation and prospect of food and drug unified authority. China Hospital CEO, 12: 76-77. (in Chinese).
[10] Huang ZY. 2013. Food safety co-governance. China Informatization, 20: 60-61. (in Chinese).
[11] Jia C, Jukes D. 2013.The national food safety control system of China - A systematic review. Food Control, 32(1): 236-245.
[12] Jin GX, Jin WQ. 2014. Grassroots food safety administration under institutional restructuring, Modern Business, 29: 78-79. (in Chinese).
[13] Li J, Su CY. 2014. Food safety administration of small and medium food industries. Science and Technology View, 22: 254-254. (in Chinese).
[14] Liu P. 2010. China’s food safety regulation: Empirical study based on institutional changes and performance assessment. Journal of Public Management, 7(2): 63-78. (in Chinese).
[15] Li P et al. 2016. Central-local relation and institutional reform: Based on empirical study on food safety institutional reform in prefectural cities. Journal of Public Administration, 9(5): 24-42. (in Chinese).
[16] Peng YF et al. 2014. Study on China’s food safety crisis and solutions. Value Engineering, 33(29): 315-316. (in Chinese).
[17] Roberts MT, Lin CF. 2016. China food law update: The 2015 Food Safety Law and social governance on food safety. Journal Of Food Law And Policy,12(2): 238-63.
[18] Sun H, Zhang WW. 2015. Study on multiple department involved food safety administration. Theory Research, 1: 155-157. (in Chinese).
[19] United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). 2008. What is good governance? pdd/ prs/projectactitities/ongoing/gg/governance.asp, accessed March 1, 2008.
[20] Wang HT. 2014. Analysis on China’s food safety administration and solutions. Brand, 12: 42. (in Chinese).
[21] Wang X. 2016. Self-regulation in China’s new food safety law. Journal of Zhejiang Provincial Party School, 1: 115-121. (in Chinese).
[22] Wu WJ. 2013. China’s food safety administration: Current situation, problems and solutions. Assets and Finances In Administration and Institution,2: 220-221. (in Chinese).
[23] Yuan SF, Zhang L, Zhang J et al., 2014. Food safety from perspective of global food safety index. 18 Food Research and Development, 343-347. (in Chinese).
[24] Zhang TT, Zhao Y. 2013. Study on China’s food safety institutional reform. Chinese Foreign Entrepreneurs, 2: 144-146. (in Chinese).
[25] Zhou MM. 2015. Legal issues in food safety standards making. Productivity Research, 12: 95-98. (in Chinese).
[26] Zou J, Li YN. 2014. China’s food safety administration reform in the background of big ministry reform. Medicine and Law, 2: 20-22. (in Chinese).