资源与生态学报

中国农业新质生产力发展水平的区域差异、动态演进及其障碍因子研究

秦琳贵, 刘松岐, 王琬植, 苗丰盛, 谢凤杰

资源与生态学报, 2025, 16(5): 1499-1514. DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2025.05.021

Year	Intra-regional		Inter-regional		Intensity of trans-variation
Year	Source	Contribution (%)	Source	Contribution (%)	Source	Contribution (%)
2011	0.032	25.03	0.081	62.68	0.016	12.29
2012	0.030	23.07	0.088	66.91	0.013	10.02
2013	0.029	23.25	0.082	66.16	0.013	10.59
2014	0.028	23.13	0.081	67.40	0.011	9.48
2015	0.028	23.18	0.081	67.47	0.011	9.35
2016	0.028	23.60	0.076	64.85	0.013	11.55
2017	0.029	23.87	0.079	64.63	0.014	11.51
2018	0.031	24.78	0.080	64.18	0.014	11.04
2019	0.032	25.00	0.081	64.02	0.014	10.97
2020	0.033	24.91	0.084	64.16	0.014	10.92
2021	0.033	24.34	0.088	65.57	0.014	10.09

Table 4 Sources of differences and contribution rates

本文的其它图/表

Table 1 Policies related to ANQPFs from 2024 to 2025
Table 2 Evaluation indicator system of ANQPFs
Figure 1 Measurement results of ANQPFs at the national and regional levels Note: The eastern region includes Beijing, Tianjin, Hebei, Liaoning, Shanghai, Jiangsu, Zhejiang, Fujian, Shandong, Guangdong and Hainan; the central region includes Shanxi, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Anhui, Jiangxi, Henan, Hubei, and Hunan; the western region includes Inner Mongolia, Guangxi, Chongqing, Sichuan, Guizhou, Yunnan, Shaanxi, Gansu, Qinghai, Ningxia, and Xinjiang.
Table 3 Measurement results of ANQPFs at the provincial level
Figure 2 Trends in overall and intra-regional Gini coefficient of ANQPFs
Figure 3 Trends in inter-regional Gini coefficient of ANQPFs
Figure 4 Structural differences of ANQPFs
Figure 5 Dynamic distribution characteristics of ANQPFs
Table 5 Markov transition probability matrix of ANQPFs
Table 6 Major obstacle factors of ANQPFs