Journal of Resources and Ecology >
Construction of Service Quality Evaluation Index System for Ski Resorts from Tourists’ Perspective: An Empirical Study Based on Grounded Theory
|
CHEN Wuxiang, E-mail: 326843685@qq.com |
Received date: 2025-07-30
Accepted date: 2025-10-30
Online published: 2026-04-13
Supported by
The Guangxi Innovation-driven Development Special Fund Project(Guike AA20302011)
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(42471284)
The National Natural Science Foundation of China(42071199)
With the increasing popularity of ski tourism, issues related to tourism service quality have become prominent. As the core venue for ski tourism, it is particularly important to establish a standardized service quality evaluation index system for ski resorts. As consumers, experiencers, and participants in tourism activities, tourists play a crucial role in the establishment of the service quality evaluation index system. This study evaluated the service quality of ski resorts from the perspective of ski tourists, focusing on six ski resorts (Zhangjiakou Taiwu Ski Resort, Jilin Songhua Lake Ski Resort, Altay Jiangjunshan Ski Resort, Harbin Yabuli Ski Resort, Guangzhou Sunac Snow Park, and Beijing Nanshan Ski Resort). Grounded theory was used to analyze online texts from the Ctrip website and interview data of tourists. The service quality evaluation system for ski resorts in China primarily included 4 main dimensions (Site Quality, Supporting Facilities, Operations Management, and Staff Service) and 18 specific indicators. These dimensions were interrelated and jointly determined tourists’ ski tourism experience and satisfaction.
CHEN Wuxiang , DENG Yanrong , YANG Liu , TANG Chengcai . Construction of Service Quality Evaluation Index System for Ski Resorts from Tourists’ Perspective: An Empirical Study Based on Grounded Theory[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2026 , 17(2) : 428 -438 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2026.02.008
Table 1 Data of the interviewees (N=12) |
| Number | Gender | Age | Location | Ski resort destination | Time of visit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Female | 23 | Beijing | Zhangjiakou Taiwu Ski Resort | December 2025 |
| 2 | Male | 42 | Guangdong | Guangzhou Sunac Snow Park | June 2025 |
| 3 | Male | 33 | Guangdong | Altay Jiangjunshan Ski Resort | March 2025 |
| 4 | Male | 45 | Guangdong | Guangzhou Sunac Snow Park | February 2025 |
| 5 | Female | 35 | Shaanxi | Harbin Yabuli Ski Resort | January 2025 |
| 6 | Female | 29 | Beijing | Zhangjiakou Taiwu Ski Resort | January 2025 |
| 7 | Female | 25 | Shanghai | Altay Jiangjunshan Ski Resort | January 2025 |
| 8 | Female | 20 | Fujian | Harbin Yabuli Ski Resort | December 2024 |
| 9 | Female | 24 | Guangxi | Harbin Yabuli Ski Resort | December 2024 |
| 10 | Female | 34 | Liaoning | Beijing Nanshan Ski Resort | December 2023 |
| 11 | Male | 30 | Shanghai | Jilin Songhua Lake Ski Resort | December 2023 |
| 12 | Female | 39 | Beijing | Beijing Nanshan Ski Resort | January 2021 |
Table 2 Open coding of ski resort evaluation texts |
| Initial category | Initial concept | Original material |
|---|---|---|
| Attitude of service staff | Attitude of general service staff | The service staff at the reception were very patient, and those in the ski resort were very responsible. However, I was dissatisfied with some staff at the ski equipment return desk; they threw the locker tags casually, which showed low quality and made people uncomfortable |
| Teaching attitude of coaches | A special thanks to Coach No. 96, who was very patient with us. With his careful teaching, we finally learned how to ski | |
| Staff professionalism | Professionalism of general staff | The skiing experience was quite good. I asked the staff in the ticket hall some questions about the ski resort, and they seemed quite professional |
| Teaching professionalism of coaches | I really want to complain about the teaching level. I had only met one reliable coach, whereas the other coaches made things more confusing the more they explained, and their level was very poor. After hiring coaches from Nanshan Ski Resort three times, I never hired them again | |
| Rental management | Update rate of ski equipment | The skiing experience was quite good. The rented equipment was good and relatively new; it should have just been replaced. Good review |
| Rental price of ski equipment | The ticket was expensive and did not include ski clothes, helmets, or goggles. Renting these individual items was expensive: 150+ for clothes, 80+ for goggles, and 50 for helmets, costing more than 300 yuan per person | |
| Site environment | Natural landscape of ski resort | The ski resort had a beautiful environment and vivid and interesting scenery settings |
| Night lighting brightness | The night session was also very good; the night lighting was bright enough, and the whole place was brightly lit | |
| Overall environmental cleanliness | There were left-behind items on the ski trails that no one cleaned up, and there was really a lot of garbage in the environment; it was very dirty | |
| Catering facilities | Catering capacity | The restaurant was large, with open-air seats and a complete range of indoor seats; there were many seats, which was good |
| Catering diversity | The resort area of Nanshan Ski Resort had a variety of catering outlets on the mountain itself and at its foot. The Taluosi Café next to the ski trail mainly provided Western food staples, such as Italian pizza and fish and chips, and beer. The Nanshan Grand Canteen, Dahuatang Northeast Restaurant, and Open-air Snack Plaza mainly provided meals and staples suitable for Asian tastes, as well as snow BBQ snacks | |
| Ski trail quality | Ski trail type | Guangzhou Sunac Snow Park covers an area of 75000 m2 and provides five different ski trails to meet the needs of all age groups. Whether you are a beginner or a professional skier, you can find your own stage here |
| Ski trail length | The ski trails were relatively short; it is recommended to increase the length of the ski trails. In short, it is a ski resort with very high cost-effectiveness | |
| Snow quality | I go skiing several times every winter and have also been to other ski resorts in Beijing. After arriving at Nanshan Ski Resort today, I feel that the snow quality is really good, different from other ski resorts; it surpasses all ski resorts in Beijing |
Table 3 Results of axial coding |
| Main category | Corresponding initial categories | Meaning of initial categories |
|---|---|---|
| Site quality | Site environment | Landscape coordination of the ski resort, lighting at night, and overall environmental cleanliness |
| Ski trail quality | Safety, width, type, quantity, congestion degree, length, and snow quality of the ski resort’s ski trails | |
| Supporting facilities | Public service facilities | Lockers (convenience, rental price), changing rooms (cleanliness, type), parking lots (convenience, number of access passages, area, price), public toilets, smoking areas, hot water supply points in rest areas, and rest areas of the ski resort |
| Catering facilities | Scale of catering facilities, catering diversity, and catering capacity | |
| Accommodation facilities | Convenience of accommodation, update rate of facilities, and cleanliness and hygiene | |
| Souvenir shops | Scale of shops and diversity of commodities/products available | |
| Transportation facilities | Transportation within the ski resort, mountain transportation system (space, quantity, speed, queuing and card-swiping method of the ski resort’s cable cars/magic carpets), distance from urban transportation, and public transportation stations | |
| Entertainment facilities | Type, safety, and quantity of entertainment facilities | |
| Site guidance facilities | Ski trail level signs and functional area road signs | |
| Intelligent facilities | Online ticket purchase channels and electronic lockers | |
| Operations management | Ticket management | Ticket price, ticket transparency, and convenience of the ticket purchase process |
| Rental management | Ski equipment (size and type of equipment, cleanliness, aesthetics, update rate, type) and rental services (number of rental points and waiting time for rental, price, process, instructions) | |
| Crowd management | Waiting time for tourists at the ski resort, queue order management, and tourist quantity management | |
| Safety management | Number of safety management staff at the ski resort, implementation of safety management systems, and allocation of medical emergency facilities and staff | |
| Staff service | Attitude | Attitude and disposition of general staff and coaches at the ski resort |
| Professionalism | Professional ability of general staff at the ski resort, and professional knowledge and ability of coaches (skiing skill level, rationality of teaching methods, and safety guidance ability) | |
| Response efficiency | Response efficiency of general staff and coaches at the ski resort | |
| Foreign language proficiency | Foreign language proficiency of general staff and coaches at the ski resort |
Table 4 Ski resort service quality evaluation index system from tourists’ perspective |
| Target layer (Core category A) | Dimension (Main category B) | Indicator layer (Corresponding category C) |
|---|---|---|
| Ski resort service quality evaluation index system (A) | Site quality (B1) | Site environment (C1) |
| Ski trail quality (C2) | ||
| Supporting facilities (B2) | Public service facilities (C3) | |
| Catering facilities (C4) | ||
| Accommodation facilities (C5) | ||
| Souvenir shops (C6) | ||
| Transportation facilities (C7) | ||
| Entertainment facilities (C8) | ||
| Site Guidance facilities (C9) | ||
| Intelligent facilities (C10) | ||
| Operations management (B3) | Ticket management (C11) | |
| Rental management (C12) | ||
| Crowd management (C13) | ||
| Safety management (C14) | ||
| Staff service (B4) | Attitude (C15) | |
| Professionalism (C16) | ||
| Response efficiency (C17) | ||
| Foreign language proficiency (C18) |
Figure 1 Diagram of internal relationships between the core and main categories of the ski resort service quality evaluation index system from tourists’ perspective |
| [1] |
|
| [2] |
|
| [3] |
|
| [4] |
|
| [5] |
|
| [6] |
|
| [7] |
|
| [8] |
|
| [9] |
|
| [10] |
|
| [11] |
|
| [12] |
|
| [13] |
|
| [14] |
|
| [15] |
|
| [16] |
|
| [17] |
|
| [18] |
|
| [19] |
|
| [20] |
|
| [21] |
|
| [22] |
|
| [23] |
|
| [24] |
|
| [25] |
|
| [26] |
|
| [27] |
|
| [28] |
|
| [29] |
|
| [30] |
|
| [31] |
|
| [32] |
|
| [33] |
|
| [34] |
|
| [35] |
|
| [36] |
|
| [37] |
|
| [38] |
|
| [39] |
|
| [40] |
|
| [41] |
|
| [42] |
|
| [43] |
|
| [44] |
|
| [45] |
|
| [46] |
|
| [47] |
|
| [48] |
|
| [49] |
|
| [50] |
|
| [51] |
|
| [52] |
|
| [53] |
|
| [54] |
|
| [55] |
|
| [56] |
|
| [57] |
|
/
| 〈 |
|
〉 |