Journal of Resources and Ecology >
Assessing the Resource Endowment for Ice-Snow Tourism Destinations and the Internet Attention Spatial Mismatch in South China
ZHANG Fan, E-mail: zhangfan@ncu.edu.cn |
Received date: 2024-12-21
Accepted date: 2025-03-15
Online published: 2025-05-28
Supported by
Jiangxi Provincial Social Science Planning Project “Research on the Optimization of Development Paths for Ice and Snow Tourism in Jiangxi Province in the Digital Economy Era”(23GL25)
Ice-snow tourism is emerging as a vital sector for economic growth. As the climate crisis affects traditional ice-snow tourism destinations, southern China has built a significant ice-snow tourism sector. This expansion is fueled by significant tourist demand, a robust economy, and a high population density, which together lead to different development opportunities for ice-snow tourism in mid- and low-latitude areas. This study examines cities in southern provinces and assesses the resource endowment of ice-snow tourism resources from 2018 to 2023 in five categories: ice-snow events, ice-snow festivals, ice-snow venues, ice-snow parks, and ice-snow attractions. By utilizing Baidu Index data, the research looks at the gap between resource endowment and internet attention in winter tourism using a spatial mismatch model. The findings indicate that: (1) Ice-snow tourism endowment in South China is currently limited but experiencing rapid growth. (2) Internet attention in winter tourism within these cities varies, following an “up-down-up” trend. (3) There is a mismatch between resource endowment and internet attention. Over time, the development paths of ice-snow tourism in southern cities can be classified into three types: priority development, active development, and inertial development, influenced by factors such as policy changes, urban economic conditions, overall tourism development, and natural geography.
ZHANG Fan , KANGIN Helena Cationa , GUO Quanen . Assessing the Resource Endowment for Ice-Snow Tourism Destinations and the Internet Attention Spatial Mismatch in South China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2025 , 16(3) : 886 -897 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2025.03.024
Figure 1 Resource endowment levels of southern China ice-snow tourism in 2018-2023 |
Figure 2 Mismatch between resource endowment and internet attention of ice-snow tourism in southern region of China |
Table 1 Mismatch of ice-snow tourism in southern region of China |
Year | Item | Positive mismatch | Negative mismatch | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low | Moderate | High | Low | Moderate | High | ||
2018 | Quantity | 77 | 2 | 0 | 66 | 3 | 2 |
Specific city(s) | Aba (3.29), Ganzi (3.89) | 0 | Xiamen (-2.39), Guilin (-2.27), Zhangjiajie (-2.09) | Shanghai (-5.68), Sanya (-4.15) | |||
2019 | Quantity | 77 | 2 | 1 | 64 | 3 | 3 |
Specific city(s) | Aba (2.69), Ganzi (2.11) | Chengdu (4.76) | Lijiang (-3.01), Xi’an (-2.67), Guilin (-2.26) | Sanya (-5.43), Xiamen (-4.19), Zhangjiajie (-4.18) | |||
2020 | Quantity | 62 | 3 | 0 | 83 | 2 | 0 |
Specific city(s) | Aba (2.52), Shanghai (3.3), Chengdu (3.6) | Xiamen (-3.67), Sanya (-2.26) | |||||
2021 | Quantity | 52 | 1 | 2 | 93 | 1 | 1 |
Specific city(s) | Chengdu (3.14) | Shanghai (4.65), Kunming (4.69) | Xiamen (-2.98) | Sanya (-4.52) | |||
2022 | Quantity | 57 | 3 | 1 | 87 | 2 | 0 |
Specific city(s) | Chengdu (2.16), Ya’an (2.44), Shanghai (3.24) | Wuhan (4.19) | Sanya (-3.01), Guilin (-2.07) | ||||
2023 | Quantity | 69 | 2 | 1 | 74 | 2 | 2 |
Specific city(s) | Aba (2.23), Chengdu (2.83) | Shanghai (4.70) | Xi’an (-2.56), Huangshan (-2.01) | Sanya (-11.6), Chongqing (-7.47) |
Note: Due to the excessive number of mild cities, it is not specifically listed in order to improve the readability of the icon. The numbers in brackets indicate the spatial dislocation index of the city in that year. |
Table 2 Classify cities according mismatch |
Category | Cities ( prefectures/region) | Total |
---|---|---|
Priority endowment | Nanjing, Nantong, Taizhou, Yichang, Xiangyang, Huanggang, Enshi Tujia Autonomous Prefecture, Shennongjia Forest area, Pingxiang, Yibin, Ya’an, Meishan, Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Aba Tibetan and Qiang Autonomous Prefecture, Guangyuan, Dazhou, Baoji, Yulin, Ankang, Hanzhong, Weinan, Xianyang, Baoshan, Qujing, Hefei, Chizhou, Xuancheng, Suzhou, Hangzhou, Huzhou, Changsha, Zhuzhou, Hengyang, Shaoyang, Qingyuan, Zhengzhou, Jiaozuo, Puyang, Luoyang, Xuchang, Xinxiang, Zhumaidan, Liupanshui, Anshun | 44 |
Active endowment | Wuxi, Xuzhou, Suzhou, Wuhan, Ezhou, Nanchang, Jiujiang, Ganzhou, Yichun, Xinyu, Chengdu, Luzhou, Tongchuan, Yan’an, Kunming, Wuhu, Fuyang, Huaibei, Bozhou, Bengbu, Jiaxing, Ningbo, Wenzhou, Xiangtan, Yiyang, Guangzhou, Shenzhen, Pingdingshan, Nanyang, Nanning, Wuzhou, Hezhou, Shanghai | 33 |
Inert endowment | Changzhou, Yangzhou, Lianyungang, Yancheng, Suqian, Huangshi, Shiyan, Xiaogan, Xianning, Shangrao, Fuzhou, Ziyang, Neijiang, Nanchong, Mianyang, Bazhong, Suining, Leshan, Guang’an, Xi’an, Shangluo, Lijiang, Zhaotong, Anqing, Lu’an, Ma’anshan, Huangshan, Tongling, Shaoxing, Jinhua, Lishui, Quzhou, Taizhou, Zhangjiajie, Yongzhou, Huaihua, Loudi, Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture, Yueyang, Changde, Chenzhou, Zhuhai, Shantou, Foshan, Huizhou, Dongguan, Zhongshan, Shaoguan, Heyuan, Yangjiang, Maoming, Fuzhou, Xiamen, Quanzhou, Zhangzhou, Putian, Nanping, Haikou, Sanya, Chongqing, Anyang, Xinyang, Kaifeng, Shangqiu, Guiyang, Zunyi, Guilin, Guigang, Yulin, Liuzhou, Beihai, Baise, Chongzuo | 73 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |