Journal of Resources and Ecology >
Community Participation, Technical Solutions, and Adaptive Management: Keys to Successful Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) Plantation Initiatives in Maharashtra
Received date: 2024-09-05
Accepted date: 2024-12-20
Online published: 2025-05-28
The Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) initiative in Maharashtra addresses the critical need to balance development with environmental conservation by ensuring compensatory afforestation for diverted forest lands. It manages funds collected from agencies using forest areas for non-forest purposes, ensuring their proper utilization for reforestation, biodiversity conservation, and ecosystem restoration. This initiative is crucial for maintaining ecological balance, mitigating climate change impacts, and promoting sustainable development in the state, while also providing transparency in the management of environmental compensation funds. This research examines the factors influencing the success of CAMPA plantations in western and central Maharashtra, India. We employed field surveys, SWOT analysis, and stakeholder interviews to assess plantation outcomes and challenges. Our analysis revealed strengths like natural forests, good rainfall, and suitable soil, alongside weaknesses such as challenging terrain, water scarcity, and wildlife interference. Opportunities for improvement include promoting natural regeneration, implementing water and soil conservation practices, and fostering local community involvement. Threats to success come from monsoon inaccessibility, inappropriate species selection, and wildlife disturbance. The study emphasizes a two-pronged approach for successful CAMPA initiatives. First, technical considerations like irrigation during initial years, planting mature saplings, and constructing large cattle-proof trenches are crucial for sapling survival, water conservation, and soil protection. Second, effective management practices are equally important. Timely access to funding ensures proper implementation, while engaging local communities through Gram Sabha (village assembly) fosters a sense of ownership and promotes plantation protection. Flexibility in planning allows for adaptation to diverse site conditions. Therefore, site observations, consultations with forest officials and key informants (to rank the crucial success factors) enabled this study to fetch dynamic results. In a nutshell, this research highlights the importance of combining scientific knowledge with community participation for building resilient and sustainable CAMPA initiatives. Stakeholders, despite minor variations in emphasis, agree on core success factors: community involvement, animal protection through large trenches, and securing funding.
WADGHANE Rahul , GHANGALE Seema , KALA Chandra Prakash , SONWANEY Vandana . Community Participation, Technical Solutions, and Adaptive Management: Keys to Successful Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority (CAMPA) Plantation Initiatives in Maharashtra[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2025 , 16(3) : 715 -729 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2025.03.009
Figure 1 Geographic distribution of nine CAMPA plantation sites across Maharashtra, displayed using QGIS |
Table 1 Vegetation cover, soil type and weather across nine CAMPA plantation sites |
No. | Site name | Vegetation cover | Soil type | Weather | References |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Alibag, Thane | Dense natural evergreen forests at hill base | Deep but eroded on steep slopes | High rainfall during monsoon; warm summers | Manibhai, 2024 |
2 | Budholi, Amboli (Murud), Warasgaon (Roha), Nigadi (Mahsala), Roha | Sparse vegetation; natural tree regrowth potential | Rocky, shallow soil; low erosion | Decent rainfall; warm and humid summers | Sawarkar, 2014 |
3 | Yawal, Jalgaon | Deciduous vegetation; proximity to diverse tree species | Good soil depth near water bodies | Moderate rainfall; hilly and steep terrain | Naphade et al., 2021; Patil and Wagh, 2023 |
4 | Jalna | Scattered trees; potential for grassland and hardy species | Rocky, hard surface; limited topsoil | Low rainfall; prone to bacterial root issues | Dsouza et al., 2024 |
5 | Sinnar, Nashik | Sparse vegetation; shrubs and karvand species present | Rocky with thin soil; moderate fertility | Good monsoon rainfall; moderate summers | Sawarkar, 2014; Kanchan et al., 2024 |
6 | Panhala, Kolhapur | Dense vegetation; suitable for fruit and native trees | Fertile but thin on steep slopes | High rainfall; moderate temperatures | Sapkale et al., 2022; Supekar and Patil, 2022 |
7 | Wai, Satara | Patchy vegetation; suitable for neem, babul | Rocky with thin soil layers | Low rainfall; warm and dry climate | Pundarikakshudu and Sujata, 2017; Tari et al., 2024 |
8 | Daund, Pune | Scattered vegetation; potential for native shrubs | Variable: rocky and fertile areas | Low rainfall; dry and warm summers | Katna et al., 2022 |
9 | Hiware-Bazar, Ahmednagar | Sparse vegetation; contour planting of aloe vera and shrubs | Rocky with limited soil | Low rainfall; drought- prone conditions | Nayak et al., 2019; Kumari et al., 2020 |
Table 2 Data sources, methods and stakeholders |
No. | Data source & method | Stakeholder(s) | Analysis method |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Site observations | Researcher | SWOT analysis |
2 | Input/discussions with forest ranger (implementing officer), village heads & observations at site | Forest officers & researcher | Qualitative analysis (any two most important themes/identified factors) |
3 | Survey of subject experts/key informants | Experts, professionals | Importance ranking/scoring of themes/ factors |
Table 3 SWOT analysis for Alibag, Thane |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Dense natural evergreen forest at the middle and base of the hill. High rainfall during monsoon, which can be stored | ·Tribal settlement with nature: Represents the community’s connection to their land and surroundings |
Weaknesses | ·Difficult to monitor due to steep slopes, heavy rains in monsoon, and warm summers Limited water availability in summer | ·Delayed funding: Delayed funding disbursement, undermining timely implementation of planned activities |
Opportunities | ·Potential for natural regeneration and introduction of soil-stabilizing plants ·Scope for soil and water conservation ·Huge scope for planting shrubs along contours | ·Mobilizing Gram Sabhas: Participatory planning and increasing awareness of ecological benefits ·Potential for cultivating fruit trees at hill bases to involve local people |
Threats | ·Cutting of trees for firewood collection ·Inappropriate planting of teak on hilltops with poor soil | ·None |
Table 4 SWOT analysis for Budholi, Amboli (Murud), Warasgaon (Roha), Nigadi (Mahsala), Roha |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Suitable rainfall ·Less soil erosion despite shallow soil depth | ·Tribal settlement with nature: Represents the community’s connection to their land and surroundings |
Weaknesses | ·Hard, rocky soil ·Disturbance caused by dense vegetation | ·Delayed funding ·Funding challenges ·Impact on implementation |
Opportunities | ·Focus on the growth of naturally existing trees instead of new plantations | ·Mobilizing Gram Sabhas: Participatory planning and increasing awareness of ecological benefits ·Potential for cultivating fruit trees at hill bases to involve local people |
Threats | ·Presence of wildlife, which may interfere with plantation activities | ·None |
Table 5 SWOT analysis for Yawal, Jalgaon |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Good soil depth at the hill base ·Water availability | ·Tribal settlement with nature: Represents the community’s connection to their land and surroundings |
Weaknesses | ·Hilly and steep slope ·Work challenges | ·Delayed funding ·Funding challenges ·Impact on implementation |
Opportunities | ·Tectona grandis, Mangifera indica, Syzygium cumini at base Terminalia officinalis, Bombax ceiba on hilltop ·Hill contour Broad and deep trench Soil and water conservation | ·Community meeting under a tree: Symbolizes traditional village gatherings for collective decision-making ·Collaborative planning with maps: Represents participatory efforts to manage local resources ·Gram Sabha resolutions: Highlights the importance of local governance and planning documents ·Hands joined in collaboration: Reflects community-driven management and shared responsibility ·Village planning for sustainable development: Focuses on managing nearby natural areas effectively ·Fruit tree cultivation ·Base of hills: Ideal locations for planting fruit trees |
Threats | ·Wildlife presence ·Rainy season access issues | None |
Table 6 SWOT analysis for Jalna |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Presence of water streams that flow during the monsoon period | None |
Weaknesses | ·Rocky and hard surface limits soil management and planting ·Threats from bacterial infections to plant roots | ·Delayed funding ·Impact on implementation |
Opportunities | ·Tectona grandis, Mangifera indica, Syzygium cumini at base ·Terminalia officinalis, Bombax ceiba on hilltop ·Hill contour ·Broad and deep trench ·Soil and water conservation | ·Community meeting under a tree: Symbolizes traditional village gatherings for collective decision-making ·Gram Sabha resolutions: Highlights the importance of local governance ·Local involvement: Encouraging community participation in conservation efforts ·Hands joined in collaboration: Reflects community-driven management and shared responsibility ·Village planning for sustainable development: Focuses on managing nearby natural areas effectively ·Participatory planning: Engaging community members in decision-making processes ·Increasing awareness: Educating locals about ecological benefits ·Fruit tree cultivation ·Base of hills: Ideal locations for planting fruit trees |
Threats | ·Deer feeding on Azadirachta indica leaves, leading to reduced tree growth ·Blackbucks feeding on planted trees, risking plantation damage | None |
Table 7 SWOT analysis for Sinnar, Nashik |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Good rainfall during monsoon: Suitable conditions for plantation ·Weather is less hot during summer: Reduces evapotranspiration loss | ·Local people’s residence nearby: Strong interest in conservation efforts |
Weaknesses | ·Rocky area with less soil at the base of the hill: Plants struggle to survive | ·Delayed funding disbursement: Undermines timely and effective implementation |
Opportunities | ·Deep and wide trenches along contours: Improves water and soil conservation ·Plantation of shrubs like karvand: Helps conserve soil and water ·Shrubs on contours with cattle-proof trenches: Enhances soil and water conservation | ·Mobilizing Gram Sabhas: Participatory planning and increasing awareness of ecological benefits ·Fruit tree cultivation at the base of hills: Ideal for planting fruit trees to boost local involvement |
Threats | ·Wildlife presence: Wild boars may disturb plantations | None |
Table 8 SWOT analysis for Panhala, Kolhapur |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Rainfall and soil are very suitable for plantation: Provides ideal conditions for plant growth | ·Local people’s interest: Villagers are motivated to conserve and address human-wildlife conflict |
Weaknesses | ·Steep slopes: Increases difficulty in plantation and conservation efforts | ·Delayed funding disbursement: Hinders timely and effective project implementation |
Opportunities | ·Fruit tree cultivation at the base of hills: Engages local communities in conservation efforts ·Deep and wide trenches in barren areas: Can significantly aid water retention and soil conservation | ·Mobilizing Gram Sabhas: Participatory planning and raising awareness of ecological benefits |
Threats | ·Bison grazing on crops: Human-wildlife conflict due to the presence of Bison, Bison damage farmer crops and may eat planted trees | None |
Table 9 SWOT analysis for Wai, Satara |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Good soil depth at the base: Supports plant growth effectively | ·Easy accessibility: Presence of good roads enhances transport and operations |
Weaknesses | ·Less rainfall and rocky surface: Thin soil layer limits vegetation growth | ·Delayed funding disbursement: Affects timely and effective implementation |
Opportunities | ·Planting water-efficient species: Neem, babul, gyricidiya, and bombax ceiba are suitable for low-water areas ·Investing in irrigation: Planting a smaller area with efficient irrigation can improve results | ·Mobilizing Gram Sabhas: Encourages participatory planning and raises ecological awareness |
Threats | None identified for this site |
Table 10 SWOT analysis for Daund, Pune |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Small water source available: Can be utilized for irrigation during summer | ·Proximity to forest nursery and local residences: Enables community participation in conservation |
Weaknesses | ·Presence of large stones on site: Hinders plantation and site preparation ·Uneven ground with obstructive stones: Indicates a need for levelling and site conditioning | ·Delayed funding disbursement: Affects timely and effective implementation of activities |
Opportunities | ·Planting species based on land variation: Adapting to both rocky and fertile soil areas can optimize results | ·Mobilizing Gram Sabhas: Encourages participatory planning and ecological awareness among locals |
Threats | ·Wild herbivores population: Can damage planted trees and vegetation | None |
Table 11 SWOT analysis for Hiware Bazar |
Aspect | Ecological details | Socio-economic details |
---|---|---|
Strengths | ·Use of deep and wide trenches along the contour: Effective for water retention and soil conservation ·Conserved grassland: Supports soil and water conservation | ·Strong community engagement: Locals actively participate in plantation protection and maintenance |
Weaknesses | ·Less rainfall: Limits the growth of certain plant species ·Rocky, stony areas with some soil: Reduces options for plantation. | ·Delayed funding disbursement: Hinders timely project execution |
Opportunities | ·Diverse tree plantation: Focus on trees that can survive in arid conditions ·Fruit tree cultivation at the base of hills: Involves locals in conservation ·Planting Aloe Vera along contours and boundaries: Helps conserve water effectively | ·Mobilizing Gram Sabhas: Encourages participatory planning and ecological awareness among locals |
Threats | ·Continuous drought over years: Affects plant survival and growth ·Mango trees unsuited for this condition: Due to lack of water and rocky soil | None |
Figure 2 Comparative ranking of the success factors of CAMPA plantations |
Figure 3 Ranking of the importance of factors for the success of CAMPA plantations |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
MoEFCC. 2021. India:Third biennial update report to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change, India.
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
Narain, Divya,
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
[44] |
|
[45] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |