The integration of ICH and tourism has emerged as a significant approach to revitalizing ICH, attracting considerable scholarly attention. Early research in this area primarily focused on the authenticity of ICH tourism (Chhabra,
2019; Park et al.,
2019), community engagement (Arokiasamy,
2012; Rasoolimanesh et al.,
2017), sustainable development (Kim et al.,
2019; Tan et al.,
2020), tourism value analysis of tourism value (Zhu et al.,
2015; Su et al.,
2020; Lan et al.,
2021), and the dual aspects of tourism development and preservation (Dong and Ding,
2019). These studies predominantly adopted frameworks from folklore, cultural studies, and industrial economics. In recent years, the scope of research has broadened to encompass geographical perspectives, with scholars utilizing theories and methodologies such as core-edge theory, point-axis system theory, and tourism system models to explore the establishment of rational spatial patterns (Meng,
2020; Zhou and Yang,
2021). Some researchers argue that spatial analysis is a critical research direction for assessing the integrated development of ICH and tourism (Feizizadeh et al.,
2023). Studies on the spatial allocation of ICH resources generally focus on distribution characteristics, influencing factors (Wang et al.,
2019), tourism utilization (Wang et al.,
2017; Katelieva et al.,
2020), and tourism responses (Li et al.,
2021; Chen et al.,
2023). Methodologies employed include the nearest neighbor index, Gini coefficient, standard deviation ellipse, and hotspot analysis (Li and Wang,
2022; Zhang et al.,
2022; Chang et al.,
2023). Many of these investigations utilize Geographic Information Systems (GIS) to assess the spatial distribution attributes of ICH resources and examine the impact of geographical, cultural, and economic factors on their distribution. A few studies propose development strategies from a tourism development perspective. Currently, there is a scarcity of research on integrated development models for culture and tourism, with existing studies largely offering qualitative analyses of theoretical and practical aspects. Most research has condensed integration models from the perspectives of integration outcomes (Cai and Fang,
2016), integration pathways (Dong and Ding,
2019), and integration strategies (Hao et al.,
2018). Scholars emphasize the fundamental conditions and dynamic systems of integrated development, suggesting that comprehensive integration of ICH and tourism can be achieved through governmental support, market demand, industrial growth, and digital protection (Marques and Borba,
2017; Tang et al.,
2023b; Tang,
2024). However, research on the integrated development model and dynamic mechanism of ICH and tourism, grounded in spatial patterns, remains a niche area within academia. In conclusion, while previous studies have made significant progress in examining the integration of ICH and tourism, certain limitations persist. Primarily, existing research tends to analyze the current state of ICH and its interaction with tourism from a macroscopic perspective, overlooking the exploration of integration models and dynamic mechanisms at a micro-level. Additionally, there is a lack of studies that investigate the integration of ICH tourism development based on the spatial characteristics of ICH, thereby overlooking the systemic integration of ICH resources from a tourism perspective. Lastly, while research has predominantly focused on national and provincial contexts, there is a need for theoretical and empirical investigations into the integration of ICH and tourism at border regions and municipal scales.