Drought monitoring is important for timely warning and the development of effective mitigation strategies. Traditional monitoring methods are based on meteorological data, such as the Palmer Drought Severity Index (Alley,
1984), the Standardized Precipitation Index (Mckee et al.,
1993), and the Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (Lopez-Moreno et al.,
2013). Traditional drought indexes are accurate, but they are often limited by the number and distribution of monitoring stations. The small spatial coverage of each station makes it difficult to accurately reflect the spatial heterogeneity of droughts (Liang et al.,
2014; Dai et al.,
2023; Zhou et al.,
2023). Remote sensing technology has been widely used in recent years due to its advantages of large spatial coverage, continuity, and convenience for large-scale and long-term drought monitoring (Rhee et al.,
2010). Based on remote sensing data, several drought indexes have been developed for monitoring drought, such as the Normalized Difference Temperature Index (Mcvicar and Jupp,
1998), the Normalized Difference Drought Index (Gu et al.,
2007), the Evaporative Stress Index (Anderson et al.,
2007), the Vegetation Condition Index (Zambrano et al.,
2016), the Temperature Condition Index (Kogan,
1995), the Vegetation Health Index (Chang et al.,
2017), the Temperature Vegetation Drought Index (Sandholt et al.,
2002a) and others. Among these indexes, the Temperature Vegetation Drought Index (TVDI) has high accuracy and is easy to implement, so it has been widely applied and verified in drought monitoring studies (Nugraha et al.,
2023). TVDI was been used for drought monitoring in China (Huang et al.,
2020b; Wang and Yu,
2021), the Unites States (Zhang et al.,
2017), Africa (Lawal et al.,
2021), Bangladesh (Sharma et al.,
2022), Australia (Tao et al.,
2021), Iran (Rahimzadeh- Bajgiran et al., 2012) and many other countries. TVDI is calculated based on the empirical parametric relationship between land surface temperature and vegetation index (Stisen et al.,
2008; Nugraha et al.,
2023). TVDI can identify vegetation water stress, although it does not necessarily define drought (Nugraha et al.,
2023). Because of this, the applicability of TVDI for the drought monitoring of different regions needs to be examined before use. In order to improve the accuracy of TVDI for drought monitoring, some other models have been developed based on surface temperature and vegetation index interactions, such as the Temperature-Vegetation-soil Moisture Dryness Index (Amani et al.,
2017), the Improved Temperature Vegetation Dryness Index (Yang et al.,
2017), the Modified Temperature Vegetation Dryness Index (Du et al.,
2017; Yan et al.,
2019a) and others. Some studies have used TVDI to explore the spatiotemporal variations and driving forces of drought (Liang et al.,
2014; Cao et al.,
2017; Cao et al.,
2020; Li et al.,
2022). The interannual variation of TVDI was different in different geographic areas in China from 2001 to 2010. It decreased in the northern and southern regions, increased in the northwestern region, and temperature was the main driving force in southern China (Liang et al.,
2014). While the TVDI did not change significantly from 2001 to 2020 in most areas of Sichuan Province, the changes were positively correlated with temperature, indicating that increasing temperature was the main reason for the increase in drought (Li et al.,
2022). However, precipitation and temperature were found to have less impact on the variations of TVDI in Xinjiang, China (Huang et al.,
2020a).