Journal of Resources and Ecology >
A Resilience Enhancement Approach to the Sponge City based on Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction—Taking the Urban Design of Jiangchuanlu Street in Shanghai, China as an Example
Received date: 2022-06-30
Accepted date: 2023-02-20
Online published: 2023-10-23
Supported by
Research on Coupled Risk Assessment and Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction of Urban Natural Disasters(22-3-YB-13)
Against the backdrop of global climate change, the threat of extreme rainfall and flooding hazards to urban safety is becoming increasingly serious, and there is an urgent need to improve the resilience of cities through the construction of sponge cities. However, improving the sponge city’s capacity for resisting the risk of urban flooding is challenging. The relevant concept of ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction (Eco-DRR) is currently one of the main international theories of urban resilience, and it has important value for enhancing urban stormwater resilience. An approach for improving the stormwater resilience of sponge cities is presented in this paper, using the urban design of Jiangchuanlu Street in Shanghai as an example and the stormwater model to simulate flood disasters on Jiangchuanlu Street. In addition to the simulation results, the population and property conditions of the site were combined in order to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment through the risk matrix. Then, the Eco-DRR measures were implemented to enhance the urban stormwater resilience of Jiangchuanlu Street based on the assessment results. Finally, the ecological infrastructure of the study area was constructed, and the safety and health units were created on the basis of the ecological substrate to prevent and respond to public health emergencies. The results show that the stormwater resilience enhancement approach based on Eco-DRR can effectively alleviate the flood risk of Jiangchuanlu Street. At the same time, the safety and health units created through the ecological infrastructure can also help to prevent and respond to public health emergencies. The results of this study provide a resilience enhancement approach for sponge cities based on Eco-DRR, as well as a theoretical reference for the planning and construction of safe and resilient cities.
DAI Daixin , BO Mingyang . A Resilience Enhancement Approach to the Sponge City based on Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction—Taking the Urban Design of Jiangchuanlu Street in Shanghai, China as an Example[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2023 , 14(6) : 1113 -1126 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.06.001
Fig. 1 The framework of sponge city resilience enhancement |
Table 1 Stormwater risk matrix |
The magnitude of each risk element | Vulnerability level | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Very low | Low | Medium | High | ||
Hazard level | Very low | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Low | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |
Medium | 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
High | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 |
Note: High, medium, low, very low corresponds to the level number of 3, 2, 1, 0. The number in the cells corresponds to the magnitude of comprehensive risk obtained through the risk matrix. |
Fig. 2 The study area of Jiangchuanlu Street |
Fig. 3 Conceptualization of the study area |
Table 2 Parameter values |
Factor | Parameter name | Value |
---|---|---|
Impermeability manning factor | N-Imperv | 0.013 |
Permeability manning factor | N-Perv | 0.24 |
Impervious surface depression storage volume | D-Imperv | 2.5 mm |
Permeable surface depression storage volume | D-Perv | 5 mm |
Pipe roughness | Roughness | 0.013 |
Maximum infiltration rate | MaxRate | 103.8 mm h-1 |
Minimum infiltration rate | MinRate | 11.4 mm h-1 |
Attenuation coefficient | Decay | 8.46 |
Table 3 Rain type of T=120 min, P=3 yr in Shanghai |
T (min) | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 25 | 30 | 35 | 40 | 45 | 50 | 55 | 60 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I (mm min-1) | 1.107 | 1.202 | 1.319 | 1.470 | 1.672 | 1.958 | 2.400 | 3.186 | 5.036 | 12.233 | 8.696 | 4.974 |
T (min) | 65 | 70 | 75 | 80 | 85 | 90 | 95 | 100 | 105 | 110 | 115 | 120 |
I (mm·min-1) | 3.573 | 2.834 | 2.375 | 2.060 | 1.829 | 1.653 | 1.513 | 1.398 | 1.303 | 1.223 | 1.153 | 1.093 |
Note: T (min) represents rainfall duration, and I (mm min-1) is the instantaneous intensity of rainfall. |
Fig. 4 Rain type diagram of T=120 min,P=3 yr in Shanghai |
Fig. 5 Distribution of overflow points in SWMM model |
Fig. 6 Mapping of hydrological simulation of submergence depthNote: The area without mapping in the figure is with simulated submersion depth of 0-0.2m. |
Table 4 Classification table of stormwater hazards and vulnerability of disaster-bearers |
Stormwater hazards classification | Vulnerability of disaster-bearers classification | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hazard level | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Vulnerability level | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
Submergence depth | >1.0 m | 0.5-1.0 m | 0.2-0.5 m | 0-0.2 m | Land use and population | High property and population density, such as residential and commercial land | Medium property and population density, such as industrial and warehouse land | Low property and population density, such as parks and wetlands | Property and population density close to zero, such as wasteland |
Table 5 Comprehensive risk level comparison table |
Comprehensive risk assessment | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Comprehensive risk level | High-risk area | Mid-risk area | Low-risk area | No risk area |
Risk matrix result | 6-9 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 0 |
Fig. 7 Comprehensive stormwater risk assessment of the study area |
Fig. 8 Site mapping of where Eco-DRR can be implemented |
Fig. 9 The implementation of Eco-DRR measures in Jiangchuanlu Street |
Table 6 Spatial types and Eco-DRR measures |
Underlying surface | Spatial type | Eco-DRR measure | Function |
---|---|---|---|
Permeable underlayment | Urban park | Stormwater park, artificial wetland | Source reduction, flow stagnation, sink storage |
Green space | Rain gardens, depressed green areas, ecological ditches | Source reduction, flow stagnation | |
Wasteland | Woodland, stormwater park | Source reduction, flow stagnation, sink storage | |
Water | River | Ecological barge | Source reduction, flow stagnation, confluence transfer |
Lake | Ecological protection and restoration | Source reduction, flow stagnation, sink storage | |
Not permeable underlayment | Community | Resilient community, community farm, Community-based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) | Source reduction, flow stagnation, sink storage, emergency response capability improvement |
Road | Ecological ditch, depressed green space | Source reduction, flow stagnation, confluence transfer | |
Green building | Green roof, vertical greening rainwater collection system | Source reduction, flow stagnation | |
Square/parking | Green space, water reservoir | Source reduction, flow stagnation |
Fig.10 Ecological infrastructure system of the study area |
Fig. 11 Stormwater risk assessment process |
Fig. 12 Hydrological simulation of submergence after Eco-DDR implementationNote: The area without mapping in the figure is with simulated submersion depth of 0-0.2m. |
[1] |
Academy of Disaster Reduction and Emergency Management ADREM. 2012. Grading methods of natural disaster risk. Beijing, China: Ministry of Civil Affairs of the People’s Republic of China.
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
Shanghai Municipal People’s Government. 2018. Special emergency plan for flood and typhoon prevention in Minhang District. http://smljl.swj.sh.gov.cn/ya/14.pdf. Viewed on 2022-08-15.
|
[17] |
Shanghai Municipal Health Commission. 2022. Shanghai reported on the prevention and control of “COVID 19”. https://wsjkw.sh.gov.cn/xwfbh/index_4.html. Viewed on 2022-08-15.
|
[18] |
Shanghai Water Authority. 2017. Standard of rainstorm intensity formula and design rainstorm distribution, China: Shanghai Municipal Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision.
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |