Journal of Resources and Ecology >
Calculation of the Environmental Carrying Capacity of the Civil Nuclear Technology Application Industry based on its Carbon Footprint
DU Yuying, E-mail: duyuying2023@163.com |
Received date: 2022-12-25
Accepted date: 2023-03-11
Online published: 2023-08-02
Supported by
The Key Subject of Leshan Social Science Planning Project(SKL2022B13)
The Science & Technology Department of Sichuan Province Research(2021JDR0229)
Civil nuclear technology has been widely used in agriculture, industry, public safety, public health, environmental protection and other fields. As an emerging strategic industry, it has guided the direction for promoting the transformation and upgrading of traditional industries, leading to a new pole of economic growth and promoting the green development of industries. From the point of view of the carbon footprint, this study calculated the carbon emission of the civil nuclear technology application industry according to the basic accounting content of life cycle analysis (LCA). The minima, maxima and means of the carbon emission status of China (excluding Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) from 2000 to 2019 were calculated using SPSS Software, and the carbon dioxide emissions were calculated by the Min-Max normalization method. We then compared the carbon emissions of each type of energy consumed by the civil nuclear industry with the carbon emissions of each of the carbon emission status of China. This comparison showed that the total emission of the civil nuclear technology application industry is small over its whole life cycle, but its output value is relatively large, so it is an environmentally-friendly industry which conforms to the trend of low-carbon development, clean production and green development. These features are in line with the requirements of economic development, so it is conducive to promoting the achievement of carbon peak carbon neutrality. In view of this, in order to further promote the development of the civil nuclear technology application industry, all departments should have a unified understanding, set up a special working coordination mechanism, actively seek the relevant policy support from their superiors, give full play to their own advantages and conduct regular inspections. In addition, we will put in place systems and policies to attract more and better projects, increase the number and improve the quality of projects, promote the “Inner Circle” development of the civil nuclear technology application industry, and expand overseas markets, in order to create an “Outer circulation” highland.
DU Yuying , HU Shiwei . Calculation of the Environmental Carrying Capacity of the Civil Nuclear Technology Application Industry based on its Carbon Footprint[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2023 , 14(5) : 965 -973 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.05.007
Table1 Several methods for calculating the carbon footprint |
Method name | Methodology |
---|---|
LCA method | The LCA method refers to a life cycle analysis method as well as a bottom-up calculation method, and a method for calculating the product and its process “from start to end”, and the calculation process is detailed and accurate |
IPCC method | IPCC refers to “Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change” in English. It is an inter-governmental organization, and its main purpose is to study the changes in the natural climate and the relationship between humans and nature. The calculation is performed mainly in accordance with emissions from energy fossil fuels |
IO method | The IO method refers to input-output method, and it is a top-down calculation method. The input and output are used for the calculation, and the calculation method is imprecise |
Kaya carbon emission identical relation | A simple mathematical formula is used to link economy, policy and population factors with the carbon dioxide produced by human activities |
Fig. 1 The carbon footprint calculation process based on the life cycle assessment |
Fig. 2 The civil nuclear technology application industry energy capture, consumption and emission processes |
Table 2 Carbon footprint in the life cycle of civil nuclear technology application |
Level 1 classification | Level 2 classification | Level 3 classification | Other greenhouse emissions from producing a unit of that product | Discharge unit |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nuclear electric power generation | Large and medium-sized commercial nuclear power | Large and medium-sized commercial nuclear power | 0.0122 | kg CO2-eq kwh-1 |
Hazardous waste | Medical waste | Medical waste | 2272.7400 | kg CO2-eq t-1 |
Industrial wastewater | Industrial wastewater average | Industrial wastewater average | 15.3200 | kg CO2-eq t-1 |
Traffic emission | Road traffic (freight) | Heavy goods vehicle | 0.0490 | kg CO2-eq t-1 km-1 |
Traffic emission | Road traffic (freight) | Medium goods vehicle | 0.0420 | kg CO2-eq t-1 km-1 |
Traffic emission | Road traffic (freight) | Light goods vehicle | 0.0830 | kg CO2-eq t-1 km-1 |
Traffic emission | Road traffic (freight) | Minivan | 0.1200 | kg CO2-eq t-1 km-1 |
Fig. 3 Distribution of points diagram for the carbon emission status of China from 2000 to 2019Note: Excluding Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan. |
Fig. 4 Normalized carbon emissions of China (excluding Tibet, Hong Kong, Macao, and Taiwan) from 2000 to 2019 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
Insight Strategic Think Tank. 2022. Agriculture has a new profit point: Carbon footprint | carbon footprint certification fully open. China, https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/cODa3o3ekw7pYoZq14b01Q. Viewed on 2020-06-05.
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
samFuB. 2022. Carbon emission data by province (2000-2019), China. https://download.csdn.net/download/li514006030/85090566. Viewed on 2022-04-07.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |