Most of the countries along the SR in the 21st century are developing countries, and the majority of them are facing the same ecological and developmental difficulties as China. In terms of natural conditions, the Middle Eastern and Central Asian areas along the belt and road are facing major threats, such as shortages of water resources, land desertification, and rising sea levels. In Kazakhstan, for example, approximately 66% of the land has become gradually degraded, and nearly 180 million hectares is desertified (Zhao et al.,
2002; Kuang et al.,
2014). Several of China's regions along the route are not in good condition. For instance, land desertification in the middle and western regions of Xinjiang and Ningxia is severe, and the soil erosion rate in several areas has reached 64.34% (Yuan et al.,
2003). The Chinese Academy of Sciences also indicated that global warming will accelerate the melting of glaciers by around 2045, and Xinjiang, Central Asia, and other places in China may experience a notable reduction in river runoff (Wang et al.,
2016). Difficulties in development and construction along the “one belt along the way” and the fragility of the ecological environment can be very closely linked. The fragility of the ecological environment restricts the economic and social construction in the countries and regions along the “OBOR”. Nevertheless, most scholars have focused on the economic development, political diplomacy, and cultural exchange of the “one belt and one road,” while minimal attention has been paid to the strategic orientation and function of the environment and ecology (Du et al.,
2017; Yu et al.,
2017). In fact, the construction of “OBOR” is not only an opportunity for economic, diplomatic, and cultural cooperation but also for cooperation in environmental protection and ecological governance. Therefore, ensuring the sustainability of resources and the environment is a major challenge for the implementation of the “SR Economic Belt,” and environmental protection has become a fundamental guarantee for the steady development of the “OBOR”. Numerous national ecological projects have been launched during the implementation of the major strategy of “OBOR” construction in recent years (Xu et al.,
2018; Zhu et al.,
2019). Their key technologies have provided scientific support for the comprehensive management of the ecological environment, with successful outcomes. China has the experience, ability, and responsibility to provide enhanced technology for other less developed countries and regions in the “OBOR” model. However, the technology, mode, and experience of ecological management proposed in the “OBOR” model in response to regional ecological problems have not been addressed in the relevant research. This shortcoming is not likely to result in a green “OBOR” of high quality. Thus, a comparative analysis method was used herein to analyse the main ecological problems faced by China's “OBOR” development process and the limitations of ecological restoration from the perspective of space. For the first time, the key technology of major ecological projects under the background of “OBOR” is introduced. This study aims to provide a reference for building a “one belt and one way” ecological management system and is of great significance for improving the global development mode and promoting global ecological governance.