Journal of Resources and Ecology >
Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Flower-viewing Tourism and Its Influencing Factors in China
WANG Lu, E-mail: wanglu@bisu.edu.cn |
Received date: 2021-10-12
Accepted date: 2021-12-28
Online published: 2022-06-07
Supported by
The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2019YFB1405600)
The General Project of Scientific Research Program of Beijing Municipal Education Commission(SM202110031002)
The Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education in China(18YJA630102)
The Youth Academic Talents Project of Beijing International Studies University(21110010005)
Despite the rapid development of flower-viewing tourism in China in recent years, there is almost no systematic research on it. Therefore, this study analyzes the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of flower-viewing tourism and its influencing factors in China using the spatial statistical analysis methods and the geographic detector method. The study uses the Point-of-Interest data of flower-viewing tourist attractions from networks such as Qunar and Ctrip, the flower observation data from China Phenological Observation Network, Chinese network news, and Weibo, and the statistical data from yearbooks. The results are as follows: 1) The spatial attribution type of flower-viewing tourism in China is aggregated into areas, including two high-density aggregated areas, three medium-density aggregated areas, and one general-density aggregated area. Furthermore, five major types of flower-viewing tourist attractions have formed several aggregated areas. 2) The time of flower viewing in China starts from about February and lasts about eight months till October each year. Florescence and flowering time of different ornamental flowers in different regions are different. 3) The spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of flower-viewing tourism in China are mainly affected by ornamental flower phenology, spatial distribution characteristics of flower-viewing resources, regional permanent population size, youth population size, female population size, regional GDP, and added value of the tertiary sector. These conclusions clarify the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of flower-viewing tourism and its influencing factors in China. They could provide a scientific basis and useful reference for the coordination and sustainable development of regional flower-viewing tourism in China.
WANG Lu , ZHOU Linjie , TANG Chengcai , NING Zhizhong . Spatial and Temporal Distribution Characteristics of Flower-viewing Tourism and Its Influencing Factors in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022 , 13(4) : 746 -758 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.04.019
Table 1 Influencing factors and sources of the spatial distribution of flower-viewing tourist attractions |
First level index | Secondary index | Evaluation index | Data sources |
---|---|---|---|
Customer market potential | Domestic tourist market | Permanent population by province | China Statistical Yearbook 2019 |
Elderly tourist market | Elderly population by province (above 65 years old) | ||
Youth tourist market | Youth population by province (0-14 years) | ||
Female tourist market | Female population by province | ||
Social economic conditions | Level of economic development | Provincial GDP, GDP per capita by province | Statistical Bulletin of National Economic and Social Development of Provinces in 2018 |
Level of service sector development | Added value of tertiary sector by province, Proportion of tertiary sector by province | ||
Level of tourism industry development | Tourism income by province | ||
Regional traffic conditions | Traffic accessibility | Comprehensive road network density by province (including railway mileage, expressway mileage, national highway mileage, and provincial highway mileage) | Year Book of China Transport & Communication 2017 |
Fig. 1 Spatial distribution of flower-viewing tourist attractions in China |
Table 2 The nearest-neighbor index and spatial distribution types of flower-viewing tourist attractions in China |
Region | Number of tourist attractions | Nearest neighbor index (R) | Z value | P value | Distribution pattern |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
China | 1153 | 0.396*** | ‒38.988 | 0.000 | Aggregated |
Beijing | 80 | 0.680*** | ‒5.468 | 0.000 | Aggregated |
Tianjin | 9 | 0.384*** | ‒3.742 | 0.000 | Aggregated |
Hebei | 41 | 0.731*** | ‒3.292 | 0.001 | Aggregated |
Shanxi | 17 | 1.071 | 0.562 | 0.574 | - |
Inner Mongolia | 10 | 1.407** | 2.338 | 0.019 | Discrete |
Liaoning | 26 | 0.749** | ‒2.453 | 0.014 | Aggregated |
Jilin | 7 | 1.664*** | 3.363 | 0.001 | Discrete |
Heilongjiang | 15 | 1.416*** | 2.981 | 0.003 | Discrete |
Shanghai | 24 | 0.926 | ‒0.694 | 0.487 | - |
Jiangsu | 101 | 0.639*** | ‒6.943 | 0.000 | Aggregated |
Zhejiang | 89 | 0.839*** | ‒2.912 | 0.004 | Aggregated |
Anhui | 31 | 0.764** | ‒2.518 | 0.012 | Aggregated |
Fujian | 26 | 0.765** | ‒2.185 | 0.029 | Aggregated |
Jiangxi | 26 | 0.881 | ‒1.157 | 0.247 | - |
Shandong | 66 | 0.788*** | ‒3.290 | 0.001 | Aggregated |
Henan | 106 | 0.597*** | ‒7.945 | 0.000 | Aggregated |
Hubei | 15 | 1.106 | 0.784 | 0.433 | - |
Hunan | 26 | 0.965 | ‒0.337 | 0.736 | - |
Guangdong | 103 | 0.652 | ‒1.324 | 0.185 | - |
Guangxi | 48 | 0.562 | ‒1.324 | 0.185 | - |
Hainan | 10 | 0.864 | ‒0.864 | 0.410 | - |
Chongqing | 42 | 0.729*** | ‒3.363 | 0.001 | Aggregated |
Sichuan | 90 | 0.744*** | ‒4.641 | 0.000 | Aggregated |
Guizhou | 22 | 1.091 | 0.801 | 0.423 | - |
Yunnan | 36 | 0.632*** | ‒3.981 | 0.000 | Aggregated |
Xizang | 8 | 1.907*** | 4.908 | 0.000 | Discrete |
Shaanxi | 29 | 0.743*** | ‒2.600 | 0.009 | Aggregated |
Gansu | 15 | 0.904 | ‒0.634 | 0.526 | - |
Qinghai | 10 | 1.147 | 0.888 | 0.374 | - |
Ningxia | 7 | 0.538** | ‒2.336 | 0.019 | Aggregated |
Xinjiang | 18 | 1.075 | 0.594 | 0.553 | - |
Note: **, and *** represent significance at the 5%, and 1% level, respectively. |
Table 3 The nearest neighbor index and spatial distribution patterns of five main types of flower-viewing tourist attractions in China |
The type of flower | The number of tourist attractions | Nearest neighbor index (R) | Z value | P value | The type of spatial structure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Peach blossom | 122 | 0.569*** | ‒9.101 | <0.001 | Aggregated |
Lavender | 117 | 0.527*** | ‒9.785 | <0.001 | Aggregated |
Rhododendron | 101 | 0.696*** | ‒5.835 | <0.001 | Aggregated |
Cherry blossoms | 98 | 0.604*** | ‒7.491 | <0.001 | Aggregated |
Peony | 82 | 0.672*** | ‒5.681 | <0.001 | Aggregated |
Note: *** represent significance at the 1% level. |
Fig. 2 Kernel density of flower-viewing tourist attractions in China |
Fig. 3 Kernel density of five main types of flower-viewing tourist attractions in China |
Fig. 4 The overall flower-viewing period in different regions of China |
Fig. 5 The centralized posting time for all kinds of ornamental flowers on Weibo |
Fig. 6 The matching situation between the dates of the flower-viewing festivals and the peak period of Weibo posts |
Fig. 7 The spatial distribution of ornamental flower resources in China |
Table 4 Influencing factors and their explanatory strength in the distribution of flower-viewing tourist attractions |
1-class indicator | 2-class indicator | Evaluation indicator | q value | P value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Customer market potential | Domestic tourist market | Permanent resident population | 0.570** | 0.007 |
Elderly visitor market | Elderly population | 0.492 | 0.070 | |
Youth visitor market | Youth population (under 14 years of age) | 0.432* | 0.047 | |
Female visitor market | Female population | 0.584** | 0.006 | |
Social economic conditions | Level of economic development | Provincial GDP | 0.806** | 0.000 |
GDP per capita | 0.235 | 0.355 | ||
Level of service sector development | Added value of tertiary sector | 0.639** | 0.008 | |
Proportion of tertiary sector | 0.06 | 0.877 | ||
Level of tourism industry development | Tourism income by province | 0.493 | 0.063 | |
Regional traffic conditions | Traffic accessibility | Comprehensive road network density | 0.284 | 0.391 |
Note: * and ** represent significance at the 5%, and 1% level, respectively. |
Fig. 8 Proportion of flower-viewing tourist attractions in different level cities |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |