Journal of Resources and Ecology >
Advancement of the Qianyanzhou Mode in the New Period
Accepted date: 2022-10-19
Online published: 2022-04-18
Supported by
The National Key Research and Development Program of China(2021YFD1000102)
The Scientific and Technical Program of The Tibet Autonomous Region(XZ201901NB11)
In the early 1980s, to control soil and water loss in the rainy season and problems of water shortages in the dry season in the red soil hilly region of central Jiangxi, the academician team of Li Wenhua from Qianyanzhou Station of the Chinese Academy of Sciences proposed a comprehensive muti-dimensional agriculture development mode known as the “Qianyanzhou Mode”. Since then, models for the forest-livestock-food ecosystem, forest-fruit-economy ecosystem, and land-water compound muti-dimensional system and others have been tested, demonstrated, promoted and used to solve major issues in ecological restoration and agricultural production. With the dawn of the new era, the Qianyanzhou Mode is being given new connotations. In order to reduce the use of pesticides and eliminate the use of antibiotics for improving the quality of agricultural products, increasing farmers' income, and assisting in strategies for rural vitalization, Qianyanzhou Station is currently focusing on the development of experiments and demonstrations of green agricultural development modes, such as forest-fruit-fowl, hybrid paper mulberry-pig-fruit, grass-sheep(cattle)-fertilizer-fruit, hybrid paper mulberry-fish-goose, paddy-shrimp, and others. The goal of this new effort is to apply the wisdom of Qianyanzhou to the construction of the ecological civilization, including ecological environment protection and the prosperity of farmers in the old revolutionary base areas in central Jiangxi Province.
WANG Jingsheng , CAO Kaili , LIU Wenjing , YANG Xiao . Advancement of the Qianyanzhou Mode in the New Period[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022 , 13(3) : 528 -536 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.03.017
Fig. 1 Schematic diagram of the Qianyanzhou Mode |
Table 1 Comparison of the main indicators before and after the development of Qianyanzhou (Unit: ha) |
Year | Arable land | Woodland | Orchard | Artificial grassland | Aquaculture water area | Wasteland and hills |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1982 | 21.7 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 175.2 |
1988 | 17.8 | 120.7 | 27.3 | 7.1 | 6.0 | 18.3 |
Note: Source of information: Ni and Deng (1990). |
Fig. 2 Effect of controlling soil erosion in the land-water compound mode |
Fig. 3 The total agricultural output value before and after the development of QianyanzhouNote: Source: Kang, 1993. |
Fig. 4 Photographs of the demonstration of the forest-fruit-fowl mode |
Table 2 Comparison and analysis of the effects of adding hybrid paper mulberry to grass carp feed |
Experimental design | Initial weight (g) | 40-day weight (g) | Weight gain relative to control (%) |
---|---|---|---|
Conventional feed (control) | 303.57 | 524.67 | - |
Conventional+15% fresh leaves | 303.57 | 588 | 12.07 |
Conventional+15% fermented powder | 303.57 | 592.25 | 12.88 |
Conventional+15% unfermented powder | 303.57 | 629.21 | 19.92 |
Fig. 5 Schematic diagram of the entire industrial chain design of Qianyanzhou's agricultural green development |
Table 3 Costs and benefits of the paddy shrimp farming mode and rice monoculture (Unit: USD ha-1 ) |
Project | Company + farmer | Scale business households | Rice monoculture | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Cash | Expense | -23.58 | -23.83 | -14.85 |
Income | 33.35 | 35.12 | 18.67 | |
Net income | 9.77 | 11.29 | 3.82 | |
Cost-benefit ratio | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | |
Value of ecosystem service functions | Positive value | 36.13 | 36.32 | 28.28 |
Negative value | -3.29 | -3.29 | -4.71 | |
Net value | 32.84 | 33.03 | 23.57 | |
Net ecological and economic benefits | 42.61 | 44.32 | 27.39 | |
Comprehensive cost-benefit ratio | 0.03 | 0.03 | 0.01 |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
Planning Office (Development Planning Division of the Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs of Jiangxi Province). 2020. Preliminary research report on the development of agricultural and rural modernization during the “14th Five-Year Plan” period in Jiangxi Province. http://nync.jiangxi.gov.cn/art/2020/9/9/art_27789_2848896.html. Viewed 9 Sep 2020. (in Chinese)
|
[13] |
Taihe Government (Taihe County People's Government). 2020. 2020 government work report. http://www.jxth.gov.cn/news-show-47290.html. Viewed 20 Jun 2020. (in Chinese)
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
/
〈 | 〉 |