Journal of Resources and Ecology >
The Concept, Connotation and Significance of Cultural Keystone Species in Agricultural Heritage Systems
Received date: 2021-07-31
Accepted date: 2021-10-15
Online published: 2022-01-08
Supported by
The Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences(XDA23100203)
As a new type of heritage, Agricultural Heritage Systems (AHS), represented by Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) designated by Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) and Nationally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (NIAHS) designated by some countries’ Ministry of Agriculture, are typical Social-Ecological Systems (SES), which usually are rich in biodiversity, traditional knowledge, resource utilization technology and outstanding cultural landscapes. Cultural Keystone Species (CKS) are defined as the culturally salient species that shape the cultural identity of a people in a major way. CKS can be used as a prominent tool for the synergistic conservation of SES biology and culture, and to promote the overall enhancement of system functions. This paper summarizes a review of the definition of the CKS and its application in SES conservation. According to the characteristics and protection needs of AHS, this paper defined the CKS in AHS as: “Composites of biological resources and cultural practices, which have a significant impact on the stability of local society and culture systems, contribute to the achievement of AHS’ conservation goals.” Based on this definition, we analyzed the significance of the identification of CKS in AHS. First of all, CKS help to quickly identify the key elements of AHS. Secondly, CKS can promote community participation in the conservation and development of AHS. In addition, the identification of CKS has a significant role in food and livelihood security, biodiversity conservation, traditional knowledge and technology transmission, social organization maintenance, and cultural landscape maintenance in AHS, which helps to achieve the conservation goals of GIAHS and/or NIAHS.
MIN Qingwen , YANG Xiao , DING Lubin . The Concept, Connotation and Significance of Cultural Keystone Species in Agricultural Heritage Systems[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2022 , 13(1) : 51 -60 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2022.01.006
Table 1 Division of cultural practice units in AHS |
First classification | Second classification | Examples of representative cultures of AHS |
---|---|---|
Production cultural practice units | · Agricultural production technology | Rice-fish-duck three-dimensional breeding technology; Water resources management technology, such as water diversion woodcut and water diversion stone carving |
· Agricultural calendar | Twenty-four Solar Terms; Kaiyangmen, Saguzhong | |
· Handicraft culture | Sculpture craft; Ceramic craft; Ware making | |
Life cultural practice units | · Food culture | Long Street Banquet; New Eating Festival; Duck Catch Festival; Frozen Fish Festival |
· Medicine culture | Application of traditional Chinese medicinal materials | |
·Dress culture | Tie dyeing; Silk reeling; Textiles; Embroidery | |
· Architectural culture | Mushroom House; Dry Bar House structure | |
· Traffic culture | Use of animal drawn vehicles | |
Spiritual cultural practice units | · Festival customs | Sacrifice to Heaven, Stars and Fire; Fish Lantern Dance; Shiyuejie |
· Religious beliefs | Multi-god worship; Ancestor worship | |
· Tradition values | The values of harmony between man and nature and respect for nature |
Fig. 1 Relationships between CKS and biocultural diversity and related concepts |
Fig. 2 Conservation of AHS function by cultural keystone species |
[1] |
|
[2] |
|
[3] |
|
[4] |
|
[5] |
|
[6] |
|
[7] |
|
[8] |
|
[9] |
|
[10] |
|
[11] |
|
[12] |
FAO. 2002. Report of the FAO workshop of potential stakeholders and steering committee on Globally-Important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems. Rome, Italy: FAO Land and Water Division.
|
[13] |
|
[14] |
|
[15] |
|
[16] |
|
[17] |
|
[18] |
|
[19] |
|
[20] |
|
[21] |
|
[22] |
|
[23] |
|
[24] |
|
[25] |
|
[26] |
|
[27] |
|
[28] |
|
[29] |
|
[30] |
|
[31] |
|
[32] |
|
[33] |
|
[34] |
|
[35] |
|
[36] |
|
[37] |
UNESCO. 1988. Declaration of Belem. Third UNESCO science and culture forum. Towards eco-ethics: Alternative visions of culture, science, technology and nature. Belem, Brazil: 6-10.
|
[38] |
|
[39] |
|
[40] |
|
[41] |
Yunnan Institute of Tropical Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. 1982. Collection of reports on tropical plant research papers. Kunming, China: Yunnan People’s Publishing House.
|
[42] |
|
[43] |
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |