EN中文

Journal of Resources and Ecology >

2020 , Vol. 11 >Issue 2: 223 - 231

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.02.010

Change in the Distribution of National Bird (Himalayan Monal) Habitat in Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas

Expand
  • 1. Key Laboratory of Land Surface Pattern and Simulation, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2019-10-25

  Accepted date: 2020-01-20

  Online published: 2020-05-30

Supported by

Chinese Academy of Sciences-The World Academy of Sciences (CAS-TWAS) President’s Fellowship Program for PhD Study.

Fold

Abstract

Gandaki River Basin (GRB) is part of the central Himalayan region, which provides habitat for numerous wild species. However, due to changes in climate and land cover, the habitats of many protected species are at risk. Based on the maximum entropy (MaxEnt) model, coupled with bioclimatic layers, land cover and DEM data, the impacts of environmental factors on habitat suitability of Himalayan Monal (Lophophorus impejanus), a national bird of Nepal, was quantified. This study further assessed the present and future habitat and distribution of the Himalayan Monal in the context of climate and land cover changes. The results of this study show that the highly suitable habitat of Himalayan Monal presently occupies around 749 km2 within the northern, eastern and western parts, particularly protected areas such as Langtang National Park, Manaslu Conservation Area and Annapurna Conservation Area, while it is likely to decrease to 561 km2 by 2050, primarily in the northern and northwestern parts (i.e., Chhyo, Tatopani, Humde and Chame). These expected changes indicate increasing risk for Himalayan Monal due to a decline in its suitable habitat area.

Key words： climate change; land cover; Himalayan Monal; habitat change; Gandaki River Basin

Cite this article

Raju RAI, Basanta PAUDEL, GU Changjun, Narendra Raj KHANAL . Change in the Distribution of National Bird (Himalayan Monal) Habitat in Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020 , 11(2) : 223 -231 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.02.010

References

1. Acharya B, Cao C, Xu M, et al. 2018. Present and future of dengue fever in Nepal: Mapping climatic suitability by ecological niche model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(2): 1-16.
2. Ahmad B, Noor F, Awan M, et al. 2019. Distribution and population status of Himalayan Monal pheasant (Lophophorus impejanus) in Salkhala game reserve, Neelum valley Azad Jammu and Kashmir (Pakistan). The Journal of Animal Plant Science, 29(4): 1150–1159.
3. Baldwin R. 2009. Use of maximum entropy modeling in wildlife research. Entropy, 11(4): 854–866.
4. Baral H. 2009. Protected birds of Nepal: A review of their status, distribution and habitat. The Initiation, 9: 66–80.
5. BCN. 2013. Important bird areas in Nepal deliver vital ecosystem services to people. Kathmandu: Bird Conservation Nepal.
6. BCN, DNPWC. 2011. The state of Nepal’s Birds 2010. Kathmandu: Bird Conservation Nepal and Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation.
7. Beck J, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Nagel P, et al. 2013. Online solutions and the ‘W allacean shortfall’: What does GBIF contribute to our knowledge of species' ranges? Diversity and Distributions, 19: 1043–1050.
8. Bhattacharya T, Sathyakumar S, Rawat G. 2009. Distribution and abundance of Galliformes in response to anthropogenic pressures in the buffer zone of Nanda Devi Biosphere Reserve. International Journal of Galliformes Conservation, 1: 78–84.
9. BirdLife International. 2016. Lophophorus impejanus. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2016: e.T22679182A92806166. http://dx.doi.org /10.2305/IUCN.UK.2016-3.RLTS.T22679182A92806166.en.
10. Brambilla M, Scridel D, Bazzi G, et al. 2020. Species interactions and climate change: How the disruption of species co-occurrence will impact on an avian forest guild. Global Change Biology, 26(3): 1212–1224.
11. Chhetri P K, Gaddis K D, Cairns D M. 2018. Predicting the suitable habitat of treeline species in the Nepalese Himalayas under climate change. Mountain Research and Development, 38(2): 153–163.
12. del Rosario Avalos V, Hernández J. 2015. Projected distribution n shifts and protected area coverage of range-restricted Andean birds under climate change. Global Ecology and Conservation, 4: 459–469.
13. Dirnb?ck T, Essl F, Rabitsch W. 2011. Disproportional risk for habitat loss of high–altitude endemic species under climate change. Global Change Biology, 17(2): 990–996.
14. DNPWC. 2018. Protected areas of Nepal. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal.
15. DNPWC, BCN. 2018. Birds of Nepal: An official checklist. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation and Bird Conservation Kathmandu, Nepal.
16. Forrest J L, Wikramanayake E, Shrestha R, et al. 2012. Conservation and climate change: Assessing the vulnerability of snow leopard habitat to treeline shift in the Himalaya. Biological Conservation, 150(1): 129–135.
17. Ganasri B, Raju A, Dwarakish G. 2013. Different approaches for land use land cover change detection: A review. Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2: 44–48.
18. Grimmett R, Inskipp C, Inskipp T, et al. 2016. Birds of Nepal (revised edition). Christopher Helm, London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
19. Gu C, Zhang Y, Liu L, et al. 2018. Comprehensive evaluation of the suitability of agricultural land in Myanmar. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 9(6): 609–622.
20. Heumann B W, Walsh S J, McDaniel P M. 2011. Assessing the application of a geographic presence-only model for land suitability mapping. Ecological informatics, 6(5): 257–269.
21. Hofmeister E, Rogall G M, Wesenberg K, et al. 2010. Climate change and wildlife health: Direct and indirect effects. Rep. No. 2327–6932. US Geological Survey.
22. Inskipp C, Baral H. 2013. Danphe––A nationally threatened species? In: Danphe, Bird Conservation Nepal, 22: 1–12.
23. Inskipp C, Baral H, Phuyal S, et al. 2016. The status of Nepal’s birds: The national red list series. Vol. 1, Zoological Society of London, UK.
24. Inskipp C, Inskipp T. 1991. A guide to the birds of Nepal (Second edition), London, UK: Christopher Helm.
25. IPCC. 2018. Summary for policymakers. In: Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, P?rtner H O, et al. (eds.). Global warming of 1.5°C. An IPCC special report on the impacts of global warming of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels and related global greenhouse gas emission pathways, in the context of strengthening the global response to the threat of climate change, sustainable development, and efforts to eradicate poverty. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization.
26. Jetz W, Wilcove D S, Dobson A P. 2007. Projected impacts of climate and land-use change on the global diversity of birds. Plos Biology, 5(6): 1211–1219.
27. Jnawali S, Baral H, Lee S, et al. 2011. The status of Nepal mammals: The national red list series 4. Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Kathmandu, Nepal.
28. Karki M, Mool P, Shrestha A. 2009. Climate change and its increasing impacts in Nepal. The Initiation, 3: 30–37.
29. Kaul R, Jandrotia J, McGowan P J. 2004. Hunting of large mammals and pheasants in the Indian western Himalaya. Oryx, 38(4): 426–431.
30. Kumar S, Radhakrishnan N, Mathew S. 2014. Land use change modelling using a Markov model and remote sensing. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 5(2): 145–156.
31. Kumar S, Stohlgren T J. 2009. Maxent modeling for predicting suitable habitat for threatened and endangered tree Canacomyrica monticola in New Caledonia. Journal of Ecology and the Natural Environment, 1: 94–98.
32. Larson S R, Degroot J P, Bartholomay L C, et al. 2010. Ecological niche modeling of potential west Nile virus vector mosquito species in Iowa. Journal of Insect Science, 10(1): 1–17.
33. Li X, Wang Y, Li J, et al. 2016. Physical and socioeconomic driving forces of land-use and land-cover changes: A case study of Wuhan City, China. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2016: 1–11. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8061069.
34. Liu L, Zhao Z, Zhang Y, et al. 2017. Using MaxEnt model to predict suitable habitat changes for key protected species in Koshi basin, central Himalayas. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(1): 77–87.
35. Ma X, Guo J, Yu X. 2011. Himalayan Monal (Lophophorus impejanus): Distribution, habitat and population status in Tibet, China. Chinese Birds, 2(3): 157–162.
36. Mandal U K. 2014. Geo-information based spatio-temporal modeling of urban land use and land cover change in Butwal municipality, Nepal. International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-8(1): 809–815.
37. Merow C, Smith M J, Silander J A. 2013. A practical guide to MaxEnt for modeling species’ distributions: What it does, and why inputs and settings matter. Ecography, 36: 1058–1069.
38. Miller J R. 2010. Survey of Western Tragopan, Koklass Pheasant, and Himalayan Monal populations in the Great Himalayan National Park, Himachal Pradesh, India. Indian Birds, 6: 60–65.
39. Mondal M S, Sharma N, Garg P, et al. 2016. Statistical independence test and validation of CA Markov land use land cover (LULC) prediction results. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 19: 259–272.
40. MPE. 2018. Weather summary of Nepal year–2014. Government of Nepal, Ministry of Population and Environment, Department of Hydrology and Meteorology, Kathmandu.
41. Mweya C N, Kimera S I, Misinzo G, et al. 2016. Climate change influences potential distribution of infected Aedes aegypti co-occurrence with dengue epidemics risk areas in Tanzania. Plos One, 11: 1–13.
42. Nie Y, Sheng Y, Liu Q, et al. 2017. A regional-scale assessment of Himalayan glacial lake changes using satellite observations from 1990 to 2015. Remote Sensing of Environment, 189: 1–13.
43. Phillips S J, Anderson R P, Schapire R E. 2006. Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling, 190: 231–259.
44. Phillips S J, Dudík M, Schapire R E. 2004. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. In: Proceedings of the twenty-first international conference on Machine learning, ACM, Banff, Canada.
45. Pielke R A, Marland G, Betts R A, et al. 2002. The influence of land-use change and landscape dynamics on the climate system: Relevance to climate-change policy beyond the radiative effect of greenhouse gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 360: 1705–1719.
46. Rai R, Zhang Y, Paudel B, et al. 2018. Land use and land cover dynamics and assessing the ecosystem service values in the Trans-Boundary Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas. Sustainability, 10: 1–22.
47. Reddy C S, Pasha S V, Satish K, et al. 2018. Quantifying nationwide land cover and historical changes in forests of Nepal (1930–2014): Implications on forest fragmentation. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27: 91–107.
48. Remya K, Ramachandran A, Jayakumar S. 2015. Predicting the current and future suitable habitat distribution of Myristica dactyloides Gaertn using MaxEnt model in the Eastern Ghats, India. Ecological Engineering, 82: 184–188.
49. Robertson T, D?ring M, Guralnick R, et al. 2014. The GBIF integrated publishing toolkit: Facilitating the efficient publishing of biodiversity data on the internet. Plos One, 9(8): 1–7.
50. Segan D B, Murray K A, Watson J E. 2016. A global assessment of current and future biodiversity vulnerability to habitat loss–climate change interactions. Global Ecology and Conservation, 5: 12–21.
51. Sodhi N S, Koh L P, Brook B W, et al. 2004. Southeast Asian biodiversity: An impending disaster. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 19: 654–660.
52. Sodhi N S, Posa M R C, Lee T M, et al. 2010. The state and conservation of Southeast Asian biodiversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19: 317–328.
53. Telenius A. 2011. Biodiversity information goes public: GBIF at your service. Nordic Journal of Botany, 29: 378–381.
54. Thuiller W. 2003. BIOMOD–Optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biology, 9: 1353–1362.
55. Uddin K, Shrestha H L, Murthy M, et al. 2015. Development of 2010 national land cover database for the Nepal. Journal of Environmental Management, 148: 82–90.
56. WII. 2016. National studybook of Himalayan Monal (Lophophorus impejanus). Wildlife Institute of India, Deharadun and Central Zoo Authority, New Delhi.
57. Ye B, Bai Z. 2008. Simulating land use/cover changes of Nenjiang County based on CA-Markov model. In: International Conference on Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture. Springer: 321–329.
58. Zhang J, Zhang Y, Liu L, et al. 2011. Predicting potential distribution of Tibetan spruce (Picea smithiana) in Qomolangma (Mount Everest) National Nature Preserve using maximum entropy niche-based model. Chinese Geographical Science, 21(4): 417–426.
59. Zhao Z, Wu X, Zhang Y, et al. 2017. Assessment of changes in the value of ecosystem services in the Koshi River Basin, central high Himalayas based on land cover changes and the CA-Markov model. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(1): 67–76.
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉