Environmental pollution caused by rapid economic development like that seen in China over the past twenty years poses various threats to human health. People have started to place much more of an emphasis on environmental security, working to find a balance between sustainability and economic growth. In recent years, air pollution has emerged as a highly discussed topic of social and environmental relevance in China, due in part to persistent smog that affects everyday life and causes serious harm to human health. Although air pollution is normally associated with human activity, is can be caused by natural processes such as eruptions and forest fires, but is always characterized by the release of certain substances into the atmosphere which, when present in certain concentrations or for given durations, can harm human health, daily life, productivity, and other aspects. In humans, it mainly affects the respiratory system, notably the lungs, as well as the immune system. A series of studies both in China and overseas have shown, in certain cases, even low concentrations of air pollution can pose a great threat to human health. In this study, we conducted an analysis of air quality policies, focusing on the 2018 revision of the People’s Republic of China’s Law on the Prevention and Control of Air Pollution (LPCAP). We utilized the content analysis method and Strauss and Corbin’s grounded theory to construct a policy framework, demarcate analysis units, code and classify policy texts, determine descriptive statistics, and analyze dimensional interactions. We used two dimensions (basic policy instruments classified as demand-, supply-, and environment-side; and air carrying capacity) to quantify and analyze the LPCAP, which enabled us to analyze the deficiencies and conflicts within policy instruments. The results show a higher utilization frequency of environment-side policy instruments, particularly regulation management and strategic measures. This reflects efforts by the government to create a favorable environment for improving air quality. Additionally, supply-side policy instruments are used far less frequently than environment-side policy instruments. Air quality legal policies and pollution control measures mainly consist of environment-side policy instruments; ecological thinking and air quality policies that are based mainly on supply-side and environment-side policy instruments; and social coordination policies that mainly use environment-side policy instruments. Based on the results of this study, we recommend an increase in the number of supply- and demand-side policy instruments, particularly the latter which includes promoting ecological thinking amongst citizens, to optimize and improve air pollution prevention and control policies.
QIN Qin, SUN Youhai
. A Study of China’s Air Pollution Prevention and Control Policy Framework from a Policy Instrument Perspective[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020
, 11(2)
: 182
-190
.
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.02.006
1 Chai F H, Xue Z G, Zhang X M, et al.2015. Strengthening responsibility and taking various measures to establish a new system of the atmospheric pollution prevention and control. Environmental Protection, 43(18): 19-24. (in Chinese)
2 Corbin J M, Strauss A.1990. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria.Qualitative sociology, 13(1): 3-21.
3 Dhital S, Rupakheti D.2019. Bibliometric analysis of global research on air pollution and human health: 1998-2017.Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(13): 13103-13114.
4 Feng G X.2016. The logic of China’s air pollution prevention and control policy changes: From the perspective of policy network. PhD diss., Shandong University. (in Chinese)
5 Feng M, Zhang Y G.2012. Application of content analysis in enterprise management research.Scientific Decision Making, 2: 83-94. (in Chinese)
6 Gu J G.2006. The significance, basis and levels of public policy tool research.Journal of Public Management, 3(4): 58-61. (in Chinese)
7 Han J.2014. Evaluation index system of air pollution environmental performance audit based on balanced score card.Global Market Information Guide, 33: 171. (in Chinese)
8 Harring, Niklas.2015. Reward or punish? Understanding preferences toward economic or regulatory instruments in a cross-national perspective.Political Studies, 64(3): 573-592.
9 He X.2016. A study on influencing factors and recoupling mechanism of policy implementation in air pollution governance. PhD diss., Huazhong University of Science and Technology. (in Chinese)
10 Ji M S, Yuan K K, Xu S L, et al.2015. Index system of urban air pollution prevention and control planning research.Environmental Science&Technology, 38(S2): 440-444. (in Chinese)
11 Li J C.1974. Air Pollution and human health.Environmental Protection, 1: 22-24. (in Chinese)
12 Liu C H, Li X F, Zhang Z S.2012. China’s sports policy analysis based on the perspective of policy instruments.China Sport Science, 32(12): 3-9. (in Chinese)
13 Liu W, Ye Z X, Liu S Y, et al.2010. Research on evaluation index system and evaluation method of regional atmospheric environmental carrying capacity//Chengdu Science and Technology Annual Sub-meeting—World Modern Garden City Air Environmental Pollution Prevention Academic Exchange Conference, Sichuan. 2010-09-29. (in Chinese)
14 Ning T T, Zhang Z S.2014. An analysis of talent policy in China based on the policy tool perspective.Chinese Public Administration, 4: 82-86. (in Chinese)
15 Owen E H, Peng H P, Zhou M D, et al.2001. Introduction to public administration (2nd edition). Beijing: China Renmin University Press: 53-62. (in Chinese)
16 Rothwell R, Zegveld W.1985. Reindustrialization and technology. London: Logman Group Limited: 196-197.
17 Roy R, Walter Z.1985. Reindustrialization and technology. London: Logman Group Limited: 45-56.
18 Song H.1997. Environmental air pollution and human health.Chinese Journal of Public Health, 4: 55-56. (in Chinese)
19 Wang H.2015. Research on the policy of China’s pension service industry from the perspective of policy tools.Studies on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics, 2: 83-89. (in Chinese)
20 Wu Y, Zhao X F.2018. Research on change of policy instruments for air pollution governance in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region—Data from policy text 2004-2017.Chinese Public Administration, 400(10): 80-87. (in Chinese)
21 Yang Z F.2013. Perfecting the legal system of the environment is the fundamental way to solve air pollution problem—Revision of air pollution prevention and control law.Environmental Protection, 41(16): 36-40. (in Chinese)
22 Zeng B, Zheng J F, Qiu Z P.2016. A study on the effect of environmental policy instruments on environmental quality—Based on the provincial panel data from 2001-2012.Shanghai Journal of Economics, 5: 39-46. (in Chinese)
23 Zhang H C, Mu Z L.2015. To declare war on air pollution by strict legal systems.Environmental Protection, 43(6): 45-47. (in Chinese)
24 Zhang H.2009. Research on scenario analysis indicators of combined air pollution based on PSR model—A case study of Guangzhou. Master diss., Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences. (in Chinese)
25 Zhang Y J.2012. Analysis on technology innovation policy in small—medium enterprises from the perspective of policy tool.Chinese Public Administration, 4: 43-47. (in Chinese)
26 Zhao W Y.2004. Design of the framework of the system info of environmental sustainable development.Sichuan Environment, 23(1): 100-104. (in Chinese)
27 Zheng S M, Luo K F.2017. Air pollution abatement efficiency and selection of environmental policy tools: Empirical evidence of 29 provinces or municipalities.China Soft Science, 9: 184-192. (in Chinese)
28 Zhou K, Yu L P.2015. Analysis of the new air pollution prevention law.Environmental Protection, 43(18): 30-33. (in Chinese)
