Effects of Grassland Restoration Approaches in Different Major Function-oriented Zones of the Headwater Region of the Yellow River in China

  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen 6700 AA, The Netherlands

Received date: 2019-08-11

  Accepted date: 2020-01-13

  Online published: 2020-05-30

Supported by

The National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFC0501906, 2016YFC0503700).


Given the high alpine grassland coverage and intensive animal grazing activity, the ecosystem and livelihood of the herders are extremely vulnerable in the headwater region of the Yellow River. A series of programs have been implemented by the Chinese government to restore degraded grasslands in this region, and major function-oriented zones (MFOZs) applied in 2014, have divided the region into three zones, i.e., the development prioritized, restricted, and prohibited zones, based on environmental carrying capacity, as well as the utilization intensity of grassland. This study identified various restoration approaches adopted in different MFOZs, and assessed the effects of the approaches in order to determine the most effective approaches. We collected 195 questionnaires from herders to analyze the effects of the various restoration approaches, and additional remote sensing and statistical data were also used for the analysis. Four distinct differences in the ecological and socioeconomic characteristics were found in three MFOZs. (1) Five technologies were applied in the study areas. (2) The grassland recovery rate was higher in development prioritized zones than in restricted and prohibited zones during 2000 and 2016, and especially high and very high coverage grasslands increased in the areas where crop-forage cultivation and grass seeding dominated in the prioritized zones. (3) The net income of households in the development prioritized zone was the best of all three zones. (4) The degree of awareness and willingness of herders to restore grassland was more positive in development prioritized zones than in restricted zones, where more herders adopted approaches with a combination of enclosure + deratization + crop-forage cultivation + warm shed. Based on these findings, it is recommended that decision-makers need to increase their efforts to narrow the gap of willingness and behavior between herders and other stakeholders, such as researchers and grassland administrators, in order to ensure grassland sustainability in the MFOZs. It is also beneficial to understand the effects of restoration on the ecological carrying capacities in different zones depending on the different development goals.

Cite this article

WEI Yunjie, ZHEN Lin, DU Bingzhen . Effects of Grassland Restoration Approaches in Different Major Function-oriented Zones of the Headwater Region of the Yellow River in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020 , 11(2) : 150 -158 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.02.003


1 DRCQP (The Development and Reform Commission of Qinghai Province). 2014. Planning of Major Function-oriented Zones in Qinghai Province. Xining: The Development and Reform Commission of Qinghai Province. (in Chinese)
2 Fan J, Tao A, Ren Q.2010. On the historical background, scientific intentions, goal orientation, and policy framework of major function-oriented zone planning in China.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 1(4): 289-299.
3 Foggin J M.2008. Depopulating the Tibetan grasslands.Mountain Research and Development, 28(1): 26-31.
4 Kammer P M, Schob C, Eberhard G, et al.2013. The relationship between soil water storage capacity and plant species diversity in high alpine vegetation.Plant Ecology & Diversity, 6(3-4): 457-466.
5 Li H X, Liu G H, Fu B J.2011. Response of vegetation to climate change and human activity based on NDVI in the Three-River Headwaters region.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(19): 5495-5504. (in Chinese)
6 Li M M, Wu B F, Yan C, et al.2004. Estimation of vegetation fraction in the upper basin of Miyun Reservoir by remote sensing.Resources Science, 26(4): 153-159. (in Chinese)
7 Li W, Zhao X, Zhang X, et al.2013. Ecosystem changes and their carbon source/carbon sink function on the Tibetan Plateau.Chinese Journal of Nature, 35(3): 172-178. (in Chinese)
8 Liu J, Shao Q, Yu X, et al.2016. Comprehensive monitoring and evaluation of terrestrial ecosystems in China. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
9 Lu D D.2009. The several issues regard to China’s regional development strategy and approach.Economic Geography, 29(1): 2-7. (in Chinese)
10 Ma Y, Zhou H, Shao X, et al.2016. Recovery techniques and demonstration of degraded alpine ecosystem in the source region of three rivers.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 36(22): 7078-7082. (in Chinese)
11 NBSC (National Bureau of Statistics of the People’s Republic of China). 2016. China Statistical Yearbook of 2016. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)
12 Piao S L, Fang J Y, Ciais P, et al.2009. The carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems in China.Nature, 458: 1009-1013.
13 QPBS and NBSSOQ (Qinghai Provincial Bureau of Statistics and National Bureau of Statistics Survey Office in Qinghai). 2016. The Statistical Yearbook of Qinghai Province. Xining: QPBS and NBSSOQ. . 2016. The Statistical Yearbook of Qinghai Province. Xining: QPBS and NBSSOQ. http://qhtjj.gov.cn/nj/2016/indexch.htm (Accessed: 21 December 2017). (in Chinese)
14 Shao Q, Cao W, Fan J, et al.2017. Effects of an ecological conservation and restoration project in the Three-River Source Region, China.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(2): 183-204.
15 Shao Q, Fan J, Liu J, et al.2016. Assessment on the effects of the first-stage ecological conservation and restoration project in Sanjiangyuan region.Acta Geographica Sinica, 71(1): 3-20. (in Chinese)
16 Shen X, Tan J.2012. Ecological conservation, cultural preservation, and a bridge between: The journey of Shanshui Conservation Center in the Sanjiangyuan region, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China.Ecology & Society, 17: 38-46.
17 Sun H, Zheng D, Yao T, et al.2012. Protection and construction of the national ecological security shelter zone on Tibetan Plateau.Acta Geographica Sinica, 67(1): 3-12. (in Chinese)
18 Tian H, Lan Y, Wen J, et al.2015. Evidence for a recent warming and wetting in the source area of the Yellow River (SAYR) and its hydrological impacts.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 25(6): 643-668.
19 Wang J, Wang Y, Li S, et al.2016. Climate adaptation, institutional change, and sustainable livelihoods of herder communities in northern Tibet. Ecology and Society, 21(1): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08170-210105.
20 Weber K E, Tiwari I P.1992. Research and survey format design: An introduction. Bangkok: Asian Institute of Technology.
21 Xiao L S, Zhang G Q, Zhu Y, et al.2017. Promoting public participation in household waste management: A survey based method and case study in Xiamen city, China.Journal of Cleaner Production, 144: 313-322.
22 Xu W.2004. The changing dynamics of land-use change in rural China: A case study of Yuhang, Zhejiang Province.Environment and Planning A, 36: 1595-1615.
23 Xue Q, Song Wei, Zhang Y, et al.2017. Research progress in ecological carrying capacity: Implications, assessment methods and current focus.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(5): 514-525.
24 Yang M Y, Dong S K, Liang J, et al.2018. Effect of herder’s decision-making mechanism on the sustainable management of alpine grasslands: A case study of Gonghe and Guinan counties in Qinghai Province.Pratacultural Science, 35(8): 2039-2048. (in Chinese)
25 Yang Y, Wang J, Liu P, et al.2019. Climatic changes dominant interannual trend in net primary productivity of alpine vulnerable ecosystems.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 10(4): 379-388.
26 Yang Y.2019. Study on ecological carrying capacity of alpine grassland on Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Master diss. Hebei Normal University. (in Chinese)
27 Yao T, Thompson L, Yang W, et al.2012. Different glacier status with atmospheric circulations in Tibetan Plateau and surroundings.Nature Climate Change, 2(9): 663-667.
28 Zhang J C.2003. The situation and resource management of cordyceps in Guoluo.Qinghai Prataculture, 12: 33-37. (in Chinese)
29 Zhang X Z, Yang Y P, Piao S L, et al.2015. Ecological change on the Tibetan Plateau.Chinese Science Bulletin, 60: 3048-3056. (in Chinese)
30 Zhang Y L, Li B Y, Zheng D.2014. GIS dataset of the boundary and area of the Tibetan Plateau in China (DBATP). Global Change Research Data Publishing & Repository.. DOI: 10.3974/geodb.2014.01.12.V1. (in Chinese)
31 Zhang Y, Zhang C, Wang Z, et al.2017. Quantitative assessment of relative roles of climate change and human activities on grassland net primary productivity in the Three-River Source Region, China.Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 26(5): 1-14. (in Chinese)
32 Zhao W, Chen H, Lin L, et al.2018. Distribution of habitat suitability for different sources of Fritillariae Cirrhosae Bulbus.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 37(4): 1037-1042. (in Chinese)
33 Zhen L, Du B, Wei Y, et al.2018. Assessing the effects of ecological restoration approaches in the alpine rangelands of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau.Environmental Research Letters, 13(9): 10. DOI: 10.1088/1748-93
34 Zhen L, Li F, Yan H M, et al.2014. Herders’ willingness to accept versus the public sector’s willingness to pay for grassland restoration in the Xilingol League of Inner Mongolia, China.Environmental Research Letters, 9(4): 3. DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/045003.
35 Zhen L, Xie Y.2019. Evaluation method and its application of ecological restoration technology for typical ecological vulnerable regions.Acta Ecologica Sinica, 39(16): 5747-5754. (in Chinese)
36 Zhen L, Yan H, Hu Y, et al.2017. Overview of ecological restoration technologies and evaluation systems.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 8(4): 315-324.
37 Zhou D, Huang R.2012. Response of water budget to recent climatic changes in the source region of the Yellow River.Chinese Science Bulletin, 57(17): 2155-2162.
38 Zhuang Q, He J, Lu Y, et al.2010. Carbon dynamics of terrestrial ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau during the 20th century: An analysis with a process-based biogeochemical model.Global Ecology & Biogeography, 19(5): 649-662.