Nowadays more and more people reside in metropolitan areas, and the impact of this phenomenon is clearly creating challenges for the environment, the economy and the society at large. It is therefore useful and in-structive to consider the issue of optimal city size and review the literature over the past decades on optimal city size theory. Based on the progress in recent years of comparative analysis and inductive research, from both theoretical and empirical perspectives, this paper outlines the original definitions proposed for optimal city size and discusses some of the advantages and disadvantages of the various theories. The two prevailing models in the classical analysis of optimal city size, the Henry George Theorem (HGT) and the neoclassical approach, are examined later. This paper then introduces the supply oriented dynamic model (SOUDY model) and offers a plausible model for optimal city size based on the general equilibrium analysis, which is related to sustainable development. The results show that: (1) Simple optimal city size theories come from the cost-benefit analysis developed by main stream economics, and therefore cannot overcome the defect that the optimal size of cities is the same since the same production function; (2)The Henry George Theorem, which is one of the classical analysis paradigms of optimal city size, has been used more frequently in recent years to research the issues of optimal tax and public goods and has gradually lost its connection to the topic of optimal city size; (3) The neoclassical approach to optimal city size consists of externalities influencing optimal city size, the equilibrium and optimal models for city size, the optimal town, product variety and city size distribution. This kind of research is still in the mainstream of the study of optimal city size. Compared to single optimal city size, more attention is paid to the optimal distribution of city size; and (4) The supply-oriented dynamic model allows for the integration of a spatial dimension into the economic research of optimal city size, and the constraint between city level and city size is relaxed and this has more power to explain real-world problems. At the same time, the general equilibrium analysis, as a significant economic research method, provides a new perspective for the study of optimal city size. The supply-oriented dynamic model and general equilibrium analysis are two new research paradigms that deserve more attention in the analysis of optimal city size.
1 Abdel-Rahman H M, Fujita M.1990. Product variety, Marshallian externalities, and city sizes.Journal of Regional Science, 30(2): 165-183.
2 Abdel-Rahman H M.1988. Product differentiation monopolistic competition and city size.Regional Science and Urban Economics, 18: 69-86.
3 Abdel-Rahman H M.1990. Agglomeration economies, types, and sizes of cities.Journal of Urban Economics, 27: 25-45.
4 Alonso W.1971. The Economics of Urban Size.Papers and Proceedings of the Regional Science Association, 26: 67-83.
5 Arnott R J, Stiglitz J E.1979. Aggregate land rents, expenditure on public goods, and optimal city size.The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 93(4): 471-500.
6 Arnott R.1979. Optimal city size in a spatial economy.Journal of Urban Economics, 6: 65-89.
7 Arnott R.2004. Does the Henry George Theorem provide a practical guide to optimal city size.American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 63(5): 1057-1090.
8 Bárcena-Ruiz J C, Casado-Izaga F J.2018. Optimal size of a residential area within a municipality. Journal of Economics, 124(1): 75-92.
9 Barr J L.1972. City size, land rent, and the supply of public goods.Regional and Urban Economics, 2(1): 67-103.
10 Bee M, Riccaboni M, Schiavo S.2019. Distribution of City Size. In: Gibrat, Pareto, Zipf (eds). The Mathematics of Urban Morphology: 77-91. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783030123802.
11 Behrens K, Kanemoto Y, Murata Y.2015. The Henry George Theorem in a second-best world.Journal of Urban Economics, 85: 34-51.
12 Behrens K, Murata Y.2009. City size and the Henry George Theorem under monopolistic competition.Journal of Urban Economics, 65(2): 228-235.
13 Burnett P.2016. Overpopulation, optimal city size and the efficiency of urban sprawl.Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 2016: 1-19. DOI: 10.1111/rurd.12051.
14 Camagni R, Capello R, Caragliu A.2013. One or infinite optimal city sizes? In search of an equilibrium size for cities.The Annals of Regional Science, 51(2): 309-341.
15 Camagni R, Capello R, Caragliu A.2015. The Rise of Second-Rank Cities: What Role for Agglomeration Economies?European Planning Studies, 23(6):1069-1089.
16 Camagni R, Diappi L, Leonardi G.1986, Urban growth and decline in a hierarchical system.Regional Science and Urban Economics, 16:: 145-160.
17 Capello R, Camagni R.2000. Beyond optimal city size: An evaluation of alternative urban growth patterns.Urban Studies, 37(9): 1479-1496.
18 Capello R.2004. Beyond optimal city size: Theory and evidence reconsidered.Urban Dynamics and Growth, 266: 57-85.
19 Chinitz B.1961. Constrast in agglomeration: New York and Pittsburgh.American Economic Review, 51: 279-289.
20 David Albouy, Kristian Behrens, Frédéric Robert-Nicoud.2019. The optimal distribution of population across cities.Journal of Urban Economics, 110: 102-113.
21 Ding H J, Zhou Y L, Sun J W.2017. The optimal size of China’s county.Urban Problems, (9): 13-18. (in Chinese)
22 Dixit A.1973. The optimum factory town.The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(2): 637-651.
23 Emilio Gómez-Déniz, Enrique Calderín-Ojeda.2015. On the use of the Pareto ArcTan distribution for describing city size in Australia and New Zealand.Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 436: 821-832.
24 Fisch O.1976. Optimal city size, land tenure and the economic theory of clubs. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 6: 33-44.
25 Fisch O.1977. Spatial equilibrium with local public goods.Regional Science and Urban Economics, 7: 197-216.
26 Flatters F, Henderson V, Mieszkowski P.1974. Public goods, efficiency, and regional fiscal equalization.Journal of Public Economics, 3: 99-112.
27 Fu H C, Jin L, Jin L.2016. The optimal city size under the happiness framework.Urban Problems, (2): 14-58.
28 Fuchs V.1967. Differentials in hourly earnings by regions and city size. In: NBER Occasional Papers No. 101, New York.
29 Gao B, Huang Q, He C, et al.2017. Similarities and differences of city-size distributions in three main urban agglomerations of China from 1992 to 2015: A comparative study based on nighttime light data.Journal of Geographical Sciences, 27(5): 533-545.
30 Getz M.1979. Optimal city size fact or fancy.Law and Contemporary Problems, 43(2): 197-210.
31 Guo L.2018. Efficiency of urban scale and ecological considerations of the optimal scale in China—analysis based on the panel data of prefecture-level cities.Urban Problems, (2):11-17. (in Chinese)
32 Han L J, Zhou W Q, Steward T A Pickett, et al.2016. An optimum city size? The scaling relationship for urban population and fine particulate (PM2.5) concentration.Environmental Pollution, 208: 96-101.
33 Hartwick J M.1980. The Henry George rule, optimal population and interregional equity.The Canadian Journal of Economics, 13(4): 695-700.
34 Henderson J V, Au C C.2006. Are China’s cities too small?Review of Economics Studies, 73: 549-576.
35 Henderson J V.1974a. Optimum city size the external diseconomy question.Journal of Political Economy, 82(2): 373-388.
36 Henderson J V.1974b. The size and types of cities.The American Economic Review, 64(4): 640-656.
37 Henderson J V.1975. Congestion and optimum city size.Journal of Urban Economics, 2: 48-62.
38 Henderson J.1985. Economic Theory and the Cities. Orlando, USA: Academic Press: 1-55.
39 Hoch I.1972. Income and city size.Urban Studies, 9: 299-328.
40 Hoch I.1977. Quality of life related to city size.Habitat International, 2(1): 219-234.
41 Huang Q, He C, Gao B, et al.2015. Detecting the 20 year city-size dynamics in China with a rank clock approach and DMSP/OLS nighttime data.Landscape and Urban Planning, 137: 138-148.
42 Intae Choi.2016. The optimum size of Seoul’s districts in South Korea. Journal of Public Affairs, 17(3). DOI: 10.1002/pa.1617.
43 Kanemoto Y, Ohkawara T, Suzuki T.1996. Agglomeration economies and a test for optimal city sizes in Japan.Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 10(4): 379-398.
44 Ke S Z, Zhao Y.2014. Industrial structure, city size and urban productivity in China.Economic Research Journal, (4): 76-88. (in Chinese)
45 Kim E, Hewings G, Nam K M.2014. Optimal urban population size: National Vs local economic efficiency.Urban Studies, 51(2): 428-445.
46 Lee K.2005. Land taxation and the Henry George theorem under uncertainty.Journal of Urban Economics, 58(1): 11-23.
47 Li J J, Luo N S.2016. Effect of urban scale on eco-effciency and the regional difference analysis.China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(2): 129-136. (in Chinese)
48 Livesey D A.1973. Optimum city size: A minimum congestion cost approach.Journal of Economic Theory, 6: 144-161.
49 Masamichi Kawano.2014. Optimal process of urbanization in a developing country dynamic Henry George theorem.Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 7(3): 195-204.
50 Mills E S, de Ferranti D M.1971. Market choices and optimum city size.American Economic Review, 61(2): 340-345.
51 Mirrlees J A.1972. The optimum town.The Swedish Journal of Economics, 74(1): 114-135.
52 Mizutani F, Tanaka T, Nakayama N.2015. Estimation of optimal metropolitan size in Japan with consideration of social costs.Empirical Economics, 48(4):1713-1730.
53 Oron Y, Pines D, Sheshinski E.1973. Optimum vs. equilibrium landuse pattern and Congestion Toll.The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(2): 619-636.
54 Rafael González-Val.2018. US city-size distribution and space.Journal of Spatial Economic Analysis, 14(3): 283-300.
55 Rainald B, Takatoshi T.2018. Pollution and city size: Can cities be too small? Journal of Economic Geography, 1-26. DOI: 10.1093/jeg/lby017.
56 Richardson H.1972. Optimality in city size, systems of cities and urban policy: a sceptic’s view.Urban Studies, 9(1): 29-47.
57 Rossi-Hansberg E.2004. Optimal urban land use and zoning.Review of Economic Dynamics, 7(1): 69-106.
58 Segal D.1976. Are there returns to scale in city size?The Review of Economics and Statistics, 58(3): 339-350.
59 Stern N.1973. Homogeneous utility functions and equality in the optimum town, a note.The Swedish Journal of Economics, 75(2): 204-207.
60 Sun X D, Zheng Y T, Zhang L L.2015. Chinese city scale based on the agglomeration economy rule.China Population, Resources and Environment, 25(3): 74-81. (in Chinese)
61 Swanson J A.1974. The size distribution of cities and optimal city size.Journal of Urban Economics, 1: 395-409.
62 Wang Y, Ning M. Wang C H.2017. Industrial structure, optimal scale and the urbanization path in China.China Economic Quarterly, 16(2): 441-462.
63 Wu J X, Wu Y R, Wang B.2017. Environmental efficiency and the optimal size of Chinese cities.China & World Economy, 25(3): 60-86.
64 Zhang J, Xie Y.2017. Optimal city size in China: An extended empirical study from the perspective of energy consumption.China City Planning Review, 26(2): 22-28.
65 Zhou Y X.1995. Urban geography. Beijing, China: The Commercial Press: 310-319.
