EN中文

Journal of Resources and Ecology >

2020 , Vol. 11 >Issue 1: 77 - 86

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.01.008

Is GIAHS an Effective Instrument to Promote Agrosystem Con-servation? A Rural Community’s Perceptions

Expand
  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2019-07-05

  Accepted date: 2019-11-20

  Online published: 2020-01-30

Supported by

The National Key Research and Development Plan of China (2017YFC0506404); Xinghua Agriculture and Rural Affairs Bureau (Evaluation of the economic, ecological and cultural values of the Xinghua Duotian agrosystem).

Fold

Abstract

The Globally Important Agricultural Heritage System (GIAHS) has been established by FAO to protect valuable agricultural systems that are rich in biodiversity and home to indigenous knowledge, technology and cultural values. GIAHS has been accepted by many countries as a tool to maintain traditional agrosystems as “living heritage”. This paper examined the Xinghua Duotian agrosystem in eastern China to explore whether the GIAHS programme is an effective instrument for top-down implementation of conservation policies initiated by the government. An intensive social survey using a questionnaire was conducted in the core conservation area to examine farmers’ understanding of the agrosystem and their willingness to conserve it. Statistical analyses including factor analysis, a linear model, a logit model and an optimal scale model were used to reveal farmers’ perception of GIAHS and the factors that impact their willingness to conserve. Results show that the agrosystem faces challenges of aging and population loss. Farmers were not very familiar with GIAHS. They did not link GIAHS to the agrosystem because they generally understood GIAHS as a title meant to bring economic benefits, although they also thought the agrosystem had non-economic values worth conserving. Because farmers were not sure about the economic outcomes of the GIAHS programme, they thought the government, not them, should take the main role in conservation. Therefore, GIAHS as a tool to encourage farmers to become active in conservation does not seem very effective. It will not become so until it truly facilitates the transformation of non-economic values to economic values in the agrosystem. We suggested that the concepts of GIAHS should be matched to farmers’ perceptions to provide farmers with conservation incentives.

Key words： Important Agricultural Heritage System (IAHS); conservation; Duotian; rural community; value perception

Cite this article

HE Siyuan, LI Heyao, MIN Qingwen . Is GIAHS an Effective Instrument to Promote Agrosystem Con-servation? A Rural Community’s Perceptions[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020 , 11(1) : 77 -86 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.01.008

References

1 Apaydin V.2015. Value, meaning and understanding of Heritage: Perception and interpretation of local communities in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Best Practices in World Heritage: People and Communities. Mahon, Minorca, April 29- May 2: 204-211.
2 Apaydin V.2017. Heritage values and communities: Examining heritage perceptions and public engagements.Journal of Eastern Mediterranean Archaeology & Heritage Studies, 5(3-4): 349-364.
3 Ashworth G J.2008. In search of the place identity dividend: Using heritage landscapes to create place identity. In: Eyles J, A Williams (eds.). Sense of place, health and quality of life. England, UK: Ashgate Publishing Limited: 185-196.
4 Bai Y, Sun X, Tian M, et al.2014. Typical water-land utilization GIAHS in low-lying areas: the Xinghua Duotian Agrosystem example in China.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 5(4): 320-327.
5 Bhaskara G I.2015. The Local community as a stakeholder group and its participation in UNESCO’s World Heritage nomination process: Jatiluwih Village, Bali, Indonesia. PhD diss., Bournemouth University.
6 Bjørkhaug H, Richards C A.2008. Multifunctional agriculture in policy and practice? A comparative analysis of Norway and Australia.Journal of rural studies, 24(1): 98-111.
7 Ceri, A, Didier B K.2011. Conservation and management of archaeological sites in Sub-Saharan Africa.Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites, 13(2-3): 95-102.
8 Chan J H, Zhang Y, McDonald T, et al. 2016. Entrepreneurship in an indigenous community: Sustainable tourism and economic development in a newly inscribed UNESCO world heritage site. In: Iankova K, A Hassan, R L’Abbe (eds.): Indigenous People and Economic Development-An International Perspective. London, UK: Routledge.
9 Chan P Y.2016. Community Participation in Heritage Management: A Case in Macao. PhD diss., Columbia University.
10 FAO.2002. Conservation and adaptive management of globally important agricultural heritage systems (GIAHS). Global Environment Facility, Project Concept Note.
11 Harrop S R.2009. Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems: An examination of their context in existing multilateral instruments dealing with conservation and land tenure.Journal of International Wildlife Law & Policy, 12(3): 127-165.
12 He L, Min Q.2013. The role of multi-functionality of agriculture in sustainable tourism development in Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) sites in China.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 4(3): 250-257.
13 Herbert D.2001. Literary places, tourism and the heritage experience.Annals of Tourism Research, 28(2): 312-333.
14 Huong P T.2015. Living heritage, community participation and sustainability. In: Labadi S, Logan W (eds.). Urban Heritage, Development and Sustainability: International Frameworks, National and Local Governance. New York, USA: Routledge: 274-290.
15 Jugmohan S, Spencer J P, Steyn J N.2016. Local natural and cultural heritage assets and community based tourism: challenges and opportunities: tourism.African Journal for Physical Activity and Health Sciences, 22(1-2): 306-317.
16 Kim T C, Gim U S, Kim J S, et al.2006. The multi-functionality of paddy farming in Korea.Paddy and Water Environment, 4(4): 169-179.
17 Koohafkan P, Altieri M.2011. A methodological framework for the dynamic conservation of agricultural heritage systems. Geneva (Switzerland): Land and Water Division, The Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations: 1-61.
18 Koohafkan P, Cruz M J D.2011. Conservation and adaptive management of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS).Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2(1): 22-28.
19 Lhomme J P, Vacher J J.2002. Modelling nocturnal heat dynamics and frost mitigation in Andean raised field systems.Agricultural and forest meteorology, 112(3-4): 179-193.
20 Li Y, Hunter C.2015. Community involvement for sustainable heritage tourism: a conceptual model.Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 5(3): 248-262.
21 Manyane R M, Darmas T.2015. Balancing government-regulated participation with community support for South Africa's Taung Skull World Heritage Site.Journal of Social Development in Africa, 30(2): 153-178.
22 Menapace L, Colson G, Raffaelli R.2012. Risk aversion, subjective beliefs, and farmer risk management strategies.American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 95(2): 384-389.
23 Min Q.2006. GIAHS: A new kind of world heritage.Resources Science, 28(4): 206-208. (in Chinese)
24 Mokoena N.2017. Community involvement and heritage management in rural South Africa.Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage, 4(3): 189-202.
25 Nyaupane G P, Timothy D J.2010. Heritage awareness and appreciation among community residents: perspectives from Arizona, USA.International Journal of Heritage Studies, 16(3): 225-239.
26 O’Leary J T, Morrison A M, Alzua A.1998. Cultural and heritage tourism: Identifying niches for international travelers.Journal of Tourism Studies, 9(2): 2-13.
27 Onciul B A.2012. Unsettling assumptions about community engagement: A new perspective on Indigenous Blackfoot participation in museums and heritage sites in Alberta, Canada. PhD diss., Newcastle University.
28 Operational Directives for the implementation of the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Heritage.2012. Paris, UNESCO General Assembly, Chapter III, article 81.
29 Qiu Z, Chen B, Nagata A.2013. Review of sustainable agriculture: Promotion, its challenges and opportunities in Japan.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 4(3): 231-241.
30 Rasoolimanesh S M, Dahalan N, Jaafar M.2016. Tourists' perceived value and satisfaction in a community-based homestay in the Lenggong Valley World Heritage Site.Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 26: 72-81.
31 Rasoolimanesh S M, Jaafar M, Ahmad A G, et al.2017. Community participation in World Heritage Site conservation and tourism development.Tourism Management, 58: 142-153.
32 Robinson C J, Renwick A R, May T, et al.2016. Indigenous benefits and carbon offset schemes: An Australian case study.Environmental Science & Policy, 56: 129-134
33 Roslan Z, Ramli Z, Shin C, et al.2017. Local community perception on the importance of cultural-natural heritage protection and conservation: Case study in Jugra, Kuala Langat, Selangor, Malaysia.Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 15(2): 107-110.
34 Ruiz-Mallén I, Corbera E, Calvo-Boyero D, et al.2015. Participatory scenarios to explore local adaptation to global change in biosphere reserves: Experiences from Bolivia and Mexico.Environmental Science & Policy, 54: 398-408.
35 Seki Y.2016. Participation of the local community in archaeological heritage management in the North Highlands of Peru. In: Finding Solutions for Protecting and Sharing Archaeological Heritage Resources, Cham: Springer: 103-119.
36 Su M, Sun Y, Min Q, et al.2018. A community livelihood approach to agricultural heritage system conservation and tourism development: Xuanhua Grape Garden urban agricultural heritage site, Hebei Province of China. Sustainability, 10(2): 361. DOI: 10.3390/su10020361
37 Sun Y, Jansen-Verbeke M, Min Q, et al.2011. Tourism potential of agricultural heritage systems.Tourism Geographies, 13(1): 112-128. (in Chinese)
38 Sun Y, Wang J, Liu M.2013. Community perspective to agricultural heritage conservation and tourism development.Journal of Resources and Ecology, 4(3): 258-266.
39 Sun Y, Zhou H, Wall G, et al.2017. Cognition of disaster risk in a tourism community: An agricultural heritage system perspective.Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 25(4): 536-553.
40 Tang X Y, Min Q, Wu Z.2010. An investigation of residents’ perception on tourism in agro-cultural heritage community: A case study on Ping’an Village of Guilin City, Guangxi.Resources Science, 32(6): 1035-1041. (in Chinese)
41 Taruvinga P, Ndoro W.2003. The vandalism of the Domboshava rock painting site: Some reflections on approaches to heritage management.Conservationand Management of Archaeological Sites, 6(1): 3-10.
42 UNESCO.2003. Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. UNESCO, Paris.
43 Van Wyk E, Breen C, Freimund W A.2014. Meanings and robustness: Propositions for enhancing benefit sharing in social-ecological systems.International Journal of the Commons, 8(2): 576-594.
44 Viñals M J, Morant M.2012. Heritage, tourism and local community interactions within the framework of site management. In: Albert M-T, Richon M, Viñals M J, et al. (eds). Community Development through World Heritage, Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre: 40-47.
45 Waterton E.2015. Heritage and community engagement. In: The ethics of cultural heritage, New York, USA: Springer: 53-67.
46 Xie J, Wu X, Tang J, et al.2010. Chemical fertilizer reduction and soil fertility maintenance in rice-fish culture system.Frontiers of Agriculture in China, 4(4): 422-429. (in Chinese)
47 Yang H Q, Wu S T, Zhang X X.2013. Study on eco-agroforestry mode selection in Jiangsu Province.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 41(11): 4877-4880. (in Chinese)
Options
Outlines

/

〈 〉