Land Resources and Land Use

Effect of Covering-soil Thickness on Crop Growth on Bare Rock nd Gravel Land in an Ecological Restoration Project

  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulic Engineering in Arid Area, Xi’an University of Technology, Xi’an 710048, China;;
    2. Shaanxi Province Land Engineering Construction Group CO., LTD., Xi’an 710075, China;;
    3. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Received date: 2018-01-07

  Revised date: 2018-05-20

  Online published: 2018-09-30

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (41561144011)


To study the mechanism by which the thickness of covering soil effects crop growth in an ecological restoration project of bare rock and gravel land, the physiological characteristics of summer maize were observed during 2010-2015. This experiment was set up on exposed rock land, which had been covered by soil with six different thicknesses: 30 (C30), 40 (C40), 50 (C50), 60 (C60), 80 (C80) and 100 cm (C100). During the experiment, soil physical properties and the physiological traits and yields of crops were recorded. The results indicated several effects. 1) With the same thickness level, soil bulk density of the covering soil increased in successive planting years. There was a logarithmic relationship between soil bulk density and covering thickness. There was also a strong algorithmic relationship between covering thickness and sedimentation coefficient (R2=0.91). 2) The thickness of covering soil had a significant influence on both the height of summer maize, and soil and plant analyzer development (SPAD) values. In each treatment, the growth rates of the crops during the jointing and booting stages were higher than that in the booting to grain filling stage. After two years of land-use, the mean height of the crop in the C50 treatment was 8.16%, 3.32%, 3.31%, 9.86% and 7.55% higher than that for the C30, C40, C60, C80 and C100 treatments, respectively. The differences between treatments were significant (p < 0.05). SPAD values were highest at the heading stage. The highest value for the C50 treatment was 298.41 after two years of land-use. 3) Soil thickness significantly affected yields and the water use efficiency (WUE) of summer maize. The highest average crop yield and WUE value during the experimental period for the C50 treatment were 4614.12 kg hm-2 and 13.57 kg hm-2 mm, respectively. For the C50 treatment the multi-year average water use efficiency was significantly higher than that of the other treatments in 2010-2015. In conclusion, a soil thickness of 50 cm covering the bare exposed rock was adequate as a tillage layer for the crop, and all crop growth indexes in this treatment were better than for other soil thicknesses. The results provide a scientific basis for the land remediation and ecological restoration of bare rock and gravel land. At the same time, for Africa, where one-third of the land is desert, arable land resources are relatively scarce and agricultural ecology is fragile, can serve as a significant reference to improve the ecological environment, develop arable land resources and increase agricultural income.

Cite this article

ZHANG Yang, LI Zhanbin, HAN Jichang, LI Peng, LI Juan . Effect of Covering-soil Thickness on Crop Growth on Bare Rock nd Gravel Land in an Ecological Restoration Project[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018 , 9(5) : 484 -492 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.05.005


[1] Alem P, Thomas P A, Iersel M W V.2015. Substrate Water Content and Fertilizer Rate Affect Growthand Flowering of Potted Petunia.Hortscience A Publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 50(4): 582-589.
[2] Burrhersey J E, Mooney S J, Bengough A G, et al.2017. Developmental morphology of cover crop species exhibit contrasting behavior to changes in soil bulk density, revealed by X-ray computed tomography.Plos One, 12(7): 1-18.
[3] Feng Q Z, Xue H L.2009. Determination of the thickness and medium of casing soil for land reclamation.Agricultural Science & Technology, 10(4): 183-188.
[4] Ghosh B N, Dogra P, Sharma N K, et al.2015. Conservation agriculture impact for soil conservation in maize-wheat cropping system in the Indian sub-Himalayas.International Soil & Water Conservation Research, 3(2): 112-118.
[5] Guo Y Y, Yu H Y, Kong D S, et al.2016. Effects of drought stress on growth and chlorophyll fluorescence of Lycium ruthenicum, Murr. seedlings.Photosynthetica, 54(4): 524-531.
[6] Gall A, Flexas J.2010. Gas-exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence measurements in grapevine leaves in the field: Methodologies and Results in Grapevine Research. Springer, Netherlands. 107-121.
[7] Huang L, Gao X, Liu M, et al.2012. Correlation among soil microorganisms, soil enzyme activities, and removal rates of pollutants in three constructed wetlands purifying micro-polluted river water.Ecological Engineering, 46(3): 98-106.
[8] Hossne G A, Méndez J, Trujillo M, et al.2015. Soil irrigation frequencies, compaction, air porosity and shear stress effects on soybean root development.Acta Universitaria, 25(1): 22-30.
[9] He M R, Wang Z L.2004. Effects of soil compaction on grain yield and quality of wheat.Acta Botanica Boreali-occidentalia Sinica, 24(41): 649-654. (in Chinese).
[10] Hemmat A, Eskandari I.2006. Dry land winter wheat response to conservation tillage in a continuous cropping system in northwestern Iran.Soil & Tillage Research, 86(1): 99-109.
[11] Joshi R, Singh J, Vig A P.2015. Vermicompost as an effective organic fertilizer and biocontrol agent: effect on growth, yield and quality of plants.Reviews in Environmental Science & Bio-technology, 14(1): 137-159.
[12] Lipiec J, Hatano R.2003. Quantification of compaction effects on soil physical properties and crop growth.Geoderma, 116(1-2): 107-136.
[13] Liu W G, Shan L, Deng X P.2001. Responses of Plant to Soil Compaction.Plant Physiology Communications. 3(37): 254-260. (in Chinese)
[14] Lv Y Z, LI B G.2006. Agrology. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. (in Chinese).
[15] Mulholland B J, Taylor I B, Black C R, et al.1996. Effect of soil compaction on barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) growth II Are increased xylem sap ABA concentrations involved in maintaining leaf expansion in compacted soils. Journal of Experimental Botany, 47(297): 539-552.
[16] Parreira M C, Barroso A A M, Portugal J M, et al.2015. Effect of drought stress on periods prior of weed interference (PPWI) in bean crop using arbitrary and tolerance estimation.Australian Journal of Crop Science, 9(12): 1249-1256.
[17] Roseberg R J, Mcoy E L.1992. Tillage and traffic-induced changes in macroporosity and macropore community: air permeability assessment.Soil Science Society of America Journal, 56: 1261-1267.
[18] Shi Y, Lin Q, Wei D B.2000. Changes of dry weight of root system after anthesis and yield in different soil thickness in dryland wheat.Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 18(2): 61-64. (in Chinese)
[19] Sarfraz H, Tariq S, Muhammad S, et al.2009. Impact of pesticides on soil microbial diversity, enzymes and biochemical reactions.Advances in Agronomy, 102(1): 159-200.
[20] Sahin U, Ekinci M, Kiziloglu F M, et al.2015. Ameliorative effects of plant growth promoting bacteria on water-yield relationships, growth, and nutrient uptake of lettuce plants under different irrigation levels.Hortscience A Publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 50(9): 1379-1386.
[21] Sun Y, Wang Y Q, Yang M, et al.2005. Effects of soil compactness stress on root activity and leaf photo-synthesis of cucumber.Acta Photophysiologica Sinica, 31(5): 545-550. (in Chinese).
[22] Tully K, Sullivan C, Weil R, et al.2015. The state of soil degradation in sub-saharan africa: baselines, trajectories, and solutions.Sustainability, (7): 6523-6552.
[23] Trethowan R M, Reynolds M, Sayre K, et al.,2005. Adapting wheat cultivars to resource conserving farming practices and human nutritional needs. Annals of Applied Biology, 146(4): 405-413.
[24] Voortman R L, Keyzer M A, et al.2003. African land ecology: opportunities and constraints for agricultural development.CID Working Papers. 32(5): 367-373. (in Chinese)
[25] Wang C J, Wu H H, Fei X M.2015. Analysis of feasibility maintaining the basic stability of the arable land area in the accelerating period of urbanization.Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 36(3): 79-85. (in Chinese)
[26] Wang J, Zhu LY, Ye W, et al.2009. Land use present status and its change analysis in Africa.Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 37(6): 2628-2631. (in Chinese)
[27] Xu M G, Lu C A, Zhang W J.2016. Situation of the quality of arable land in China.Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 37(7): 8-14. (in Chinese)
[28] Yang J C.2011. Relationships of rice root morphology and physiology with the formation of grain yield and quality and the nutrient absorption and utilization.Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 44(1): 36-46. (in Chinese)
[29] Zheng H, Huang H, Zhang C, et al.2016. National-scale paddy-upland rotation in Northern China promotes sustainable development of cultivated land.Agricultural Water Management, 170: 20-25.
[30] Zhang B P, Zhang X Q, Zheng D.2010. Arid Northwest China can not be regarded as the farmland reserve base.Arid Zone Research, 27(1): 1-5. (in Chinese).
[31] Zhu B, Kuang F H, Gao M R, et al.2009. Effects of Soil Thickness on Productivity of Sloping Cropland of Purple Soil.Journal of Mountain Science, 27(6): 735-739. (in Chinese)