Resources Policy

Quantitative Analysis of Central Asian Countries’ Energy Security and Its Political Influence Factors

  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. China Institute for Innovation and Development Strategy, Beijing 100107, China

Received date: 2018-01-18

  Revised date: 2018-04-20

  Online published: 2018-07-24

Supported by

The Key Deployment Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (ZDRW-ZS-2016-6-1-4).


Central Asian countries are located in the heartland of the Eurasian Continent. Their geographic location puts their energy flows under tremendous geopolitical pressure from the countries along their limited number of pipelines. With energy trade data from the United Nations Comtrade Statistics Database in the period from 2005 to 2016, this paper evaluates energy security of Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan (exporter) and Kyrgyzstan (importer) using three standards: correlativeness, diversity, and the impact of international relations. It concludes that Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan’s oil markets are balanced in terms of correlation and diversification, and thus less subject to geopolitical pressure. Turkmenistan’s gas markets, on the other hand, still have tremendous exposure to geopolitical risks for lack of diversification. Kyrgyzstan, as an energy importer, could rely on a few neighboring countries for energy supply. We found out that the three Central Asian countries’ energy security is largely determined by four political factors: the relationship with Russia, the new “great game” in Eurasia, the rise of China, and Central Asian regional geopolitical configuration.

Cite this article

CHEN Xiaopeng, CHENG Shengkui, WU Liang . Quantitative Analysis of Central Asian Countries’ Energy Security and Its Political Influence Factors[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018 , 9(4) : 434 -443 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.04.011


[1] Brzezinski Z.2016 (2nd.). The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives. New York: Hachette Book Group.
[2] Cohen A.1996. The New “Great Game”: Oil Politics in the Caucasus and Central Asia. Washington D.C: the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies.
[3] Cohen A.1997. U.S. Policy in the Caucasus and Central Asia: Building a New “Silk Road” to Economic Prosperity. Washington D.C: the Thomas A. Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies.
[4] Cohen G, F Joutz, P Loungani.2011. Measuring energy security: trends in the diversification of oil and natural gas supplies. IMF Working Paper WP/11/39.
[5] Costantini V, F Gracceva, A Markandya, et al.2005. Security of energy supply: comparing scenarios from a European perspective.Energy Policy, 35(1): 210-226.
[6] Goodman R, J Hart, R Rosecrance. 1975. Testing international theory: methods and data in a situational analysis of international politics. In: Azar E, J Ben-Dak, P M Burgess (eds.). Theory and Practice of Events Research: Studies in Inter-nation Actions and Interactions. New York: Cordon and Beach Science Publishers, 1-63.
[7] Heinrich A, H Pleines. 2014. Export Pipelines from the CIS Region: Geopolitics, Securitization, and Political Decision-Making. New York: Ibidem Press.
[8] Laruelle M, S Peyrouse.2014. The Chinese Question in Central Asia: Domestic Order, Social Change, and the Chinese Factor. London: Hurst & Company.
[9] Le Coq C, Paltseva E.2009. Measuring the security of external supply in the EU.Energy Policy, 36(11): 4474-4481.
[10] Liu L T, Shen L, Liu XJ.2012. Theories, methods, and progress of energy security research.Progress in Geography, 31(04): 403-411. (in Chinese).
[11] Mackinder H.1904. The geographical pivot of history.The Geographical Journal, 4: 432.
[12] Malashenko A.2013. The fight for influence: Russia in Central Asia. Washington D.C.: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
[13] McClelland, C. 2006. World Event/ Interaction Survey(WEIS) Project, 1966-1978(ICPSR) [EB/OL]. [2017-11-11]. http://www.icpsr.umich. edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/studies/5211.
[14] Mehdi P A.1999. Towards the Control of Oil Resources in the Caspian Region. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
[15] Merritt R, R G Muncaster, D A Zinnes 1994. International Event Data Development: DDIR Phase. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[16] Neff L T.1997. Improving energy security in Pacific Asia: diversification and risk reduction for fossil and nuclear fuels. Pacific Asia Regional Energy Security (PARES) Project.
[17] Neumann A.2004. Security of supply in liberalized European gas markets. Diplomarbeit, European University Viadrina Frankfurt (Oder).
[18] O’Hara S, M Hefferman. 2013. From geostrategy to geo-economics: the “Heartland” and British imperialism before and after Mackinder. In: Megoran N, S Sharapova (eds.). Central Asia in International Relations: the Legacies of Halford Mackinder. New York: Columbia University Press, 91-116.
[19] Richard M, R G Muncaster, D A Zinnes. 1994. International Event Data Development: DDIR Phase. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
[20] Stringer K D.2008. Energy security: applying a portfolio approach.Baltic Security & Defense Review, 10(10): 121-142.
[21] Schrodt P A, D Gerner. 2000. Analyzing International Event Data: A Handbook of Computer Based Techniques. papers.dir/automated.html. [EB/OL]. [2017-11-12].
[22] Victor D G, A M Jaffe, M H Hayes. 2008. Natural Gas and Geopolitics: From 1970 to 2040. London: Cambridge University Press.
[23] Vivoda V.2010. Diversification of oil import sources and energy security: A key strategy or an elusive objective?Energy Policy, 37(11): 4615-4623.
[24] Willrich M.1978. Energy & World Politics. New York: Free Press.
[25] World Event/ Interaction Survey (WEIS) Project. 1966-1978(ICPSR) . 1966-1978(ICPSR) (Accessed on 25 August 2017.
[26] Wu G, Y M Wei, Y Fan, et al.2007. An empirical analysis of the risk of crude oil imports in China using improved portfolio approach.Energy Policy, 35(8): 4190-4199. (in Chinese).
[27] Xu JS.2012. On the power of oil: the core question of geopolitics of energy. World Economics and Politics, 15(12): 115-132+159-160. (in Chinese).
[28] Yan XT, Zhou FY.2004. Quantitative measurement of bilateral relationship.Social Sciences in China, 25(6): 90-103. (in Chinese).