Small-scale household agricultural production has been in conflict with China’s agricultural modernization. In the context of vigorously promoting rural land circulation and moderate scale management nationwide, research on the relationship between farm size and scale efficiency has become increasingly important. In this paper, we use the “DEA-OLS” two stage method to analyze data from 368 surveys of rice farming households in the Jianghan Plain. The scale efficiency of rice farming was calculated, and the relationship between farm size and scale efficiency investigated. The results indicate that (1) the rice farm size is generally small in Jianghan Plain, with an average of 0.77 ha. The average scale efficiency is 0.88, and it is the main factor limiting an increase in comprehensive technical efficiency. Moreover, 88.32% of households are in the stage of increasing returns to scale. (2) There is a stable inverted “U” type relationship between rice farm size and scale efficiency. Considering characteristics of the householder, the household and land quality, the maximum scale efficiency corresponds to a household with 5 ha of rice farm. (3) Among householder characteristics, age has a significant negative influence on scale efficiency, and scale efficiency is lower for a household whose householder is engaged in non-farm work than for one whose householder is devoted to farming. As for land quality, there was a significant positive effect of irrigation on scale efficiency. Among family characteristics, the application of a machine during the seeding process increased scale efficiency by 3.07%. Therefore, we suggest that local government should actively promote rural land circulation, implement a staged-scale management subsidy, and other forms of support for the purchase of agricultural machinery and technical popularization. Increased investment in irrigation improvements and mechanical facilities and encouragement of farmers to enlarge their farm size could improve scale efficiency and farming profit and lead to the development of moderate scale management.
WANG Jiayue, XIN Liangjie
. Is Larger Scale Better? Evidence from Rice Farming in Jianghan Plain[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018
, 9(4)
: 352
-364
.
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.04.003
[1] Ajit K G.1979. Farm size and land productivity in Indian agriculture: A reappraisal.Journal of Development Studies, 16(1): 27-49.
[2] Assunção J J, Ghatak M.2003. Can unobserved heterogeneity in farmer ability explain the inverse relationship between farm size and productivity?Economics Letters, 80(2): 189-194.
[3] Alvarez A, Arias C.2004. Technical efficiency and farm size: A conditional analysis. Agricultural Economics, 30(3): 241-250.
[4] Aziz K, Bola A A, Taiwo T A.2014. Production and scale efficiency of maize farming households in South-Western Nigeria.International Journal of Social Economics, 41(11): 1087-1100.
[5] Ali D A, Deininger K.2015. Is there a farm size-productivity relationship in African agriculture? Evidence from Rwanda. Land Economics, 91(2): 317-343.
[6] Anang B T, Bäckman S, Rezitis A.2016. Does farm size matter? Investigating scale efficiency of peasant rice farmers in northern Ghana.Economics Bulletin, 36(4): 2275-2290.
[7] Berry R A and Cline W R (eds.). 1979. Agrarian structure and productivity in developing countries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
[8] Barrett C B, Bellemare M F, Hou J Y.2010. Reconsidering conventional explanations of the inverse productivity-size relationship.World Development, 38(1): 88-97.
[9] Chayanov A V (eds.). 1926. The theory of peasant economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
[10] Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E.1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units.European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429-444.
[11] Chen Z, Huffman W E, Scott Rozelle.2011. Inverse relationship between productivity and farm size: The case of China.Contemporary Economic Policy, 29(4): 580-592.
[12] Ellis F (eds.). 2006. Peasant Economics: peasant household agricultural and agriculture development. Shanghai People Press.
[13] Ferdinand T (eds.). 1999. Community and society: the basic concept of pure sociology. Commercial Press.
[14] Graham D.1991. Farm size-farm productivity re-examined: Evidence from rural Egypt. Journal of Peasant Studies, 19(1): 59-92.
[15] Huang X J, Jiang R Q, Fu C M.2013. Study on land moderate scale management based on family farms.Truth Seeking, 55(6): 94-96. (in Chinese)
[16] Han C F. 2015. Report of the State Council on stabilizing and improving the rural land contract relationship [EB/OL], http://www.npc.gov.cn/ npc/xinwen/2015-08/29/content_1945073.htm. (in Chinese)
[17] Kagin J, Taylor J E, Antonio Y N.2015. Inverse productivity or inverse efficiency? Evidence from Mexico.Journal of Development Studies, 52(3): 1-16.
[18] Lamb R L.2001. Inverse productivity: land quality, labor markets, and measurement error.Journal of Development Economics, 71(1): 71-95.
[19] Li G C, Feng Z C, Fan L X.2010. Is the small-sized rural household more efficient? The empirical evidence from Hubei province.China Economic Quarterly, 9(1): 99-128. (in Chinese)
[20] Li G C, Feng Z C, You L Z, et al.2013. Re-examining the inverse relation-ship between farm size and efficiency: The empirical evidence in China. China Agricultural Economic Review, 5(4): 473-488.
[21] Li W M, Luo D, Chen J, et al.2015. Moderate scale of agricultural management: Scale benefit, output level and production costs—based on the survey data of 1552 rice farmers.Chinese Rural Economy, 31(3): 4-17. (in Chinese)
[22] Liu Y, Jin Y, Wang M M.2016. Analysis on technical efficiency of rice farmer in different scales—A case study of Jianghan Plain.Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 36(4): 15-21. (in Chinese)
[23] Rios A R and Shively G E.2005. Farm size and nonparametric efficiency measurements for coffee farms in Vietnam[EB/OL]. In Paper presented at the American agricultural economics association annual meeting, Providence, RI. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/65856? show=full.
[24] Sen A K.1962. An aspect of Indian agriculture.Economic Weekly, 14(4-6): 243-266.
[25] Sen A K.1964. Size of holdings and productivity.Economic Weekly, 25(2): 218-218.
[26] Sen A K (eds.). 1975. Employment, technology and development : a study prepared for the International Labour Office within the framework of the World Employment Programme. London: Oxford University Press.
[27] Sun X H.2013. Agricultural production operator: Comparison of types and path choice——from the perspective of the overall production efficiency.Research on Economics and Management, 34(12): 59-66. (in Chinese)
[28] Taslim M A.1989. Supervision problems and the size-productivity relation in Bangladesh agriculture.Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 51(1): 55-71.
[29] Tchale H, Alene A D, Amaza P.2009. The efficiency of smallholder agriculture in Malawi.African Journal of Agricultural & Resource Economics, 3(2): 101-121.
[30] Wang Z B.2011. Study on moderate rice farming under the opportunity cost—a case study of Heling village in Linchuan district, Fuzhou city, Jiangxi province.Rural Economy, 31(12): 59-66. (in Chinese)
[31] Wu Z P.2011. A theoretical and empirical research on appropriate scale agricultural operation—a case study of rice planting scale in Hunan province. PhD diss., Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences. (in Chinese)
[32] Xin L J, Li X B, Zhu H Y, et al.2009. Validation of the inverse farm size-productivity relationship and its explanations: A case study of Jilin Province.Geographical Research, 28(5): 1276-1284. (in Chinese)
[33] Xin L, Hu Z Q.2015. Study on the calculation of agricultural moderate large-scale operation.Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 31(11): 278-283. (in Chinese)
[34] Yang G Q, Hu L, Wang W X.2011. Moderate scale of farmers’ cultivated land management and its performance: An empirical analysis based on questionnaire survey of rural households in 6 counties in Hubei province.Resources Science, 33(3): 505-512. (in Chinese)
[35] Zyl J V, Binswanger H, Thirtle C.1995. The relationship between farm size and efficiency in South African agriculture. The World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 1-45.
