We examined the Hulun Lake protected area (HLPA) and tourist willingness to pay (WTP) for ecotourism resources using the contingent valuation method (CVM). Eight hundred questionnaires were distributed in the HLPA and 708 questionnaires were collected. To establish the relationship between variables and WTP, 11 variables were incorporated into the model. Social trust factors and awareness factor were for the first time applied to the models, and two bid equations were obtained by the first and second bid. We found that tourist WTP for ecotourism resources in the HLPA was CNY 14 710 389 in 2010, indicating that tourists have a large WTP for protected area ecotourism resources. Most tourists (79.9%) were willing to pay for ecotourism resources and 21.1% tourists were unwilling to pay. The most common explanation for unwillingness to pay was that it was the government’s responsibility, influenced by special social and economic characteristics in China and indicating that Chinese residents lack resource protection awareness and participation. Income and the awareness of being in a protected area most significantly affected WTP. Trusting protected area authorities significantly affected WTP. Tourists’ satisfaction affected WTP negatively in the first equation and WTP positively in the second equation. These results reveal that tourists had large WTP for ecotourism resources. To improve the WTP for ecotourism resources, the protected area management department could use third-party monitoring mechanisms and accounting systems to strengthen tourists’ trust, and increase ecological education and modify the “one site, several brands” management system.
WANG Pengwei, ZHONG Linsheng
. Tourist Willingness to Pay for Protected Area Ecotourism Resources and Influencing Factors at the Hulun Lake Protected Area[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018
, 9(2)
: 174
-180
.
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.02.007
[1] Baral N, Gautam R, Timilsina N, et al.2007. Conservation implications of contingent valuation of critically endangered white-rumped vulture Gyps bengalensis in South Asia. The International Journal of Biodiversity Science and Management, 3(3): 145-156.
[2] Baral N, Stern M J, Bhattarai R.2008. Contingent valuation of ecotourism in Annapurna conservation area, Nepal, implications for sustainable park finance and local development. Ecological Economics, 66(2-3): 218-227.
[3] Ciriacy-Wantrup S V, 1947. Capital returns from soil-conservation practices. Journal of Farm Economics, 29(4): 1181-1196.
[4] Ferreira S, Gallagher L, 2010. Protest responses and community attitudes toward accepting compensation to host waste disposal infrastructure. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 638-652.
[5] Kenter J O, Hyde T, Christie M, et al.2011. The importance of deliberation in valuing ecosystem services in developing countries—Evidence from the Solomon Islands. Global Environmental Change, (21): 505-521.
[6] Kotchen M J, Reiling S D, 2000. Environmental attitudes, motivations, and contingent valuation of nonuse values, a case study involving endangered species. Ecological Economics, 32(1): 93-107.
[7] Lin L Y, Xu L Z, Hu J, et al.2014. Determination of industry ecological compensation standard using contingent valuation method: A case study of stone industry in Ningde City, Fujian Province.Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 34(1): 259-264. (in Chinese)
[8] Li, H. B., Li, Y. Y.2010. Non-use value assessment of ecotourism resources in Wuyishan Nature Reserve.Chinese Journal of Ecology, 29(8): 1639-1645. (in Chinese)
[9] John A A, Sorada, T, 2008. A contingent valuation study of scuba diving benefits: Case study in Mu KoSimilan Marine National Park, Thailand. Tourism Management, 29(6): 1122-1130.
[10] Marina G L, Berta M L, Carlos M, 2011. Exploring the motivations of protesters in contingent valuation: Insights for conservation policies. Environmental science and Policy, 14(1): 76-88.
[11] Orchard-Webb J, Kenter J O, Bryce R, et al.2016.Deliberative Democratic Monetary Valuation to implement the Ecosystem Approach. Ecosystem Services, (21): 308-318.
[12] Shrestha R K,Stein T V, Clark J, 2007. Valuing nature-based recreation in public natural areas of the Apalachicola River region,Florida. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(4): 977-985.
[13] Wang Y, Zhang Y S, 2009. Air quality assessment by contingent valuation in Ji’nan, China.Journal of Environmental Management, 90(2): 1022-1029.
[14] Vip W, Subramanian S V, Mitchell A D, et al.2007.Does social capital enhance health and well-being? Evidence from rural China. Social Science and Medicine, 64(1): 35-49.
[15] Völker M, Lienhoop N, 2016. Exploring group dynamics in deliberative choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 123: 57-67.
[16] Zhang D C, 2006. Evaluation of the no-use values of the wetland resources in Dongting Lake based on CVM. Areal Research and Development, 25(2): 105-111. (in Chinese)
[17] Wang P W, Jia J B, 2012. Evaluation of non-use value of ecotourism resources: a case study in Hulun Lake protected area of China. Acta Ecological Sinica, 32(3): 955-963. (in Chinese)
[18] Wang P W, Jia J B, 2012. Tourists’ willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation and environment protection, Hulun Lake protected area: Implications for entrance fee and sustainable management. Ocean & Coastal Management, 62: 24-33.
[19] Wang P W, Ya J, Zhong L S, et al.2016. Respondent Uncertainty and Reliability in Contingent Valuation-A case of Hulun Lake Protected Area, Limnologica, 58: 59-68.
[20] Wilson J J, Lantz V A, MaclLean D A, 2010. A benefit-cost analysis of establishing protected natural areas in New Brunswick, Canada. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(2): 94-103.
[21] Xu Z M, Zhang Z Q, Long A H, Comparison and application of different contingent valuation methods in measuring total economic value of restoring Ejina Banner’s ecosystem services. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2003, 23(9): 1841-1851. (in Chinese)
[22] Zhou Y, Zhou Q B, Zhou X Y, et al.2015. Research progress of contingent valuation method for application to agricultural. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 35(24): 7955-7964. (in Chinese)
[23] Zong X, Cui G F, Yuan J,2008. Contingent valuation of the existent economic of Giant Panda. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 28(5): 2090- 2098. (in Chinese)
