Research Articles

Public Participation in Rural Environmental Governance around the Water Source of Xiqin Water Works in Fujian

  • Institute of Sustainable Development, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China

Received date: 2017-08-31

  Revised date: 2017-11-05

  Online published: 2018-01-26

Supported by

FORHEAD with funding from the Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF)


Public participation is an important way to improve the overall effect and social recognition of rural environmental governance in water source areas. Public participation makes environmental governance measures more targeted and effective, contributes to protecting the basic environmental rights of the public, and makes it easier to meet the livelihood needs of rural people. Public participation in rural environmental governance in water source areas is characterized by complex behavior and is dependent on public willingness to participate. Amongst other factors, it is subject to the combined influences of both internal (psychological cognition) and external (environmental regulation) conditions. This paper builds a theoretical framework for understanding public participation behavior in rural environmental governance, and uses it to analyze a case in the rural area surrounding the Xiqin Water Works in Fujian Province. In the case study, the public shows high willingness to participate, but low actual rates of participation. At the same time, the willingness of villagers to pay for the control of pollution from livestock and poultry breeding varies greatly from village to village, and there are also noticeable individual differences in public participation in the use of public collection points for rural household waste. We found that gender, understandings of environmental protection and perception of environmental regulation, play a key role in influencing the willingness of farmers to pay for the control of pollution from livestock and poultry breeding. Individual awareness of environmental protection, environmental protection facility conditions, and environmental service quality had a significant influence on public participation in the use of public collection points for rural household waste.

Cite this article

SU Shipeng, LI Xin, HUANG Ansheng, SUN Xiaoxia . Public Participation in Rural Environmental Governance around the Water Source of Xiqin Water Works in Fujian[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018 , 9(1) : 66 -77 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2018.01.008


[1] Ajzen I. 2011. The theory of planned behavior: Reactions and reflections. Psychology & Health , 26(9): 1113 - 1127.
[2] Albrecht J. 2016. Legal framework and criteria for effectively coordinating public participation under the Floods Directive and Water Framework Directive: European requirements and German transposition. Environmental Science & Policy , 55: 368 - 375.
[3] Bennett M T. 2008. China’s sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual?. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 699 - 711.
[4] Brunner N, M Starkl. 2012. Financial and economic determinants of collective action: The case of wastewater management. Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 32(1): 140 - 150.
[5] Campbell L M, Z A Meletis. 2011. Agreement on water and a watered-down agreement: The political ecology of contested coastal development in Down East, North Carolina. Journal of Rural Studies , 27(3): 308 - 321.
[6] Dalahmeh S S, M Assayed, W T Suleiman. 2009. Themes of stakeholder participation in greywater management in rural communities in Jordan. Desalination , 243 (1-3): 159 - 169.
[7] Delicath J W. 2004. Communication and Public Participation in Environmental Decision Making . Albany, NY, State of University of New York Press.
[8] Dungumaro E W, N F Madulu. 2003. Public participation in integrated water resources management: the case of Tanzania. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth , 28 (20 - 27): 1009 - 1014.
[9] Elder P S. 1975. Environmental Management and Public Participation . Toronto: Canadian Environmental Law Association, 384。
[10] Friend H D, S S Coutts. 2006. Achieving sustainable recycled water initiatives through public participation. Desalination , 187 (1 - 3): 159 - 166.
[11] García-Nieto A P, C Quintas-Soriano, M García-Llorente, et al . 2015. Collaborative mapping of ecosystem services: The role of stakeholders' profiles. Ecosystem Services , 13: 141 - 152.
[12] Guagnano GA, PC Stern, T Dietz. 1995. Influences on attitude-behavior relationships: A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior , 27(5): 699 - 718.
[13] Howard T M. 2017, ‘Raising the bar’: The role of institutional frameworks for community engagement in Australian natural resource governance. Journal of Rural Studies , 49: 78 - 91.
[14] Larson K L, D Lach. 2008. Participants and non-participants of place-based groups: An assessment of attitudes and implications for public participation in water resource management. Journal of Environmental Management , 88(4): 817 - 830.
[15] Li F, B Xiong, B Xu. 2008. Improving public access to environmental information in China. Journal of Environmental Management , 88(4): 1649 - 1656.
[16] Li W. 2016. Failure by design-National mandates and agent control of local land use in China. Land Use Policy , 52: 518 - 526.
[17] Liu J, Y Luan, L Su, et al . 2010. Public participation in water resources management of Haihe river basin, China: the analysis and evaluation of status quo. Procedia Environmental Sciences , 2(6): 1750 - 1758.
[18] Liu Q, J Zhang, X Li. 2010. Exploration of relations between environment and health from the perspective of social psychology. The World of Survey and Research , (10): 42 - 44. (in Chinese)
[19] Lostarnau C, J Oyarzun. H Maturana, et al . 2011. Stakeholder participation within the public environmental system in Chile: Major gaps between theory and practice. Journal of Environmental Management , 92(10): 2470 - 2478.
[20] Manos B, M Partalidou, F Fantozzi, et al. 2014. Agro-energy districts contributing to environmental and social sustainability in rural areas: Evaluation of a local public-private partnership scheme in Greece. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews , 29(29): 85 - 95.
[21] Morris C. 2004. Networks of agri-environmental policy implementation: a case study of England’s Countryside Stewardship Scheme. Land Use Policy , 21(2): 177 - 191.
[22] Pan Y. 2004. Environmental protection and public participation. Frontier Forum, (13):12 - 13.
[23] Park S, M Howden, S Crimp. 2012. Informing regional level policy development and actions for increased adaptive capacity in rural livelihoods. Environmental Science & Policy , 15(1):23 - 37.
[24] Ren B. 2011. Public participation in the environment field: an analytical framework of typology. The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute , (3): 71 - 76. (in Chinese)
[25] Rouillard J J, A D Reeves, K V Heal, et al . 2014. The role of public participation in encouraging changes in rural land use to reduce flood risk. Land Use Policy , 38(21): 637 - 645.
[26] Scodanibbio L, G Mañez. 2005. The World Commission on Dams: A fundamental step towards integrated water resources management and poverty reduction? A pilot case in the Lower Zambezi, Mozambique. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 30(11-16): 976 - 983.
[27] Sheely R. 2015. Mobilization, participatory planning institutions, and elite capture: Evidence from a field experiment in rural Kenya. World Development , 67: 251 - 266.
[28] Tang B, S Wong, M C Lau. 2008. Social impact assessment and public participation in China: A Case study of land requisition in Guangzhou. Environmental Impact Assessment Review , 28(1): 57 - 72.
[29] Triguero A, C Álvarez-Aledo, M C Cuerva. 2016. Factors influencing willingness to accept different waste management policies: empirical evidence from the European Union. Journal of Cleaner Production , 138: 38 - 46.
[30] Tsai B, D Lu, M Chung, et al . 2013. Evaluation of PPGIS empowerment-A case study of Meinong Yellow Butterfly Valley in Taiwan. Journal of Environmental Management , 116: 204 - 212.
[31] Uthes S, B Matzdorf. 2016. Budgeting for government-financed PES: Does ecosystem service demand equal ecosystem service supply?. Ecosystem Services , 17: 255 - 264.
[32] Ville ASS, G M Hickey, L E Phillip. 2017. How do stakeholder interactions influence national food security policy in the Caribbean? The case of Saint Lucia. Food Policy , 68: 53 - 64.
[33] Wang J, Y Li, K Huang, et al . 2011. Status quo and influence factors of treatment of rural domestic solid waste. Chinese Population Resources and Environment , 21(6): 74 - 78. (in Chinese)
[34] Zhi J, T Guo, Y Liao, et al . 2010. Research progress in the impact of non-point source pollution on human health. Ecology and Environmental Sciences , 19(6): 1459 - 1464. (in Chinese)