Evaluation of Agricultural Ecological Security in Hubei Province

  • 1. School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China;
    2. Business School, Wuhan Institute of Design and Sciences, Wuhan 430205, China

Received date: 2017-06-06

  Revised date: 2017-09-20

  Online published: 2017-11-30

Supported by

Key Project of National Social Science Fund of China (15AZD062); Graduate Education Innovation Program Fund of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law (2016Y1054)


With the promotion of agricultural ecological civilization construction in China, agricultural ecological security has received increasing attention. How to ensure agricultural ecological security has become a great concern for many scholars. As an important agricultural province in China, Hubei is of great significance to Chinese food security and agricultural sustainable development. This paper aims to establish an index system of agricultural ecological security and security classification of Hubei via Analytic Hierarchy Process and Pressure-State-Response methods. An evaluation of agricultural ecological security in Hubei, with a base of the national average value in 2015, reveals that the security degree has increased by 0.07566 from 0.90150 in 2005 to 0.97716 in 2015. Results show that agricultural ecological security in Hubei has improved but failed to reach the national average and there is still large space for improvement of the security level, considering a trend of deterioration in some indexes, such as per capita water resources, population density, per unit area pesticide load of farmland, forest coverage, grassland degradation rate and average annual precipitation. Influencing factors, especially population spatial distribution, misconduct in agricultural production, insufficient ability in agricultural natural disaster prevention, deficiency of agro-ecological technology of agricultural ecological security in Hubei are analyzed. For improvement of the degree of agricultural ecological security in Hubei, some countermeasures and suggestions are discussed.

Cite this article

LI Pingheng, YAN Lidong, PAN Shilei, MA Yifei . Evaluation of Agricultural Ecological Security in Hubei Province[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017 , 8(6) : 620 -627 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.06.008


1 Andersen T, Carstcnscn J, Hernandez-Garcia E, et al . 2009. Ecological thresholds and regime shifts: approaches to identification. Trends in Ecology and Evolution , 24(5): 49-57.
2 Deng C X, Xie B G, WU Y X, el al . 2011. Quantitative and comprehensive evaluation of ecological security of urban agriculture in Shanghai. Geographical Research , 30(4): 645-654. (in Chinese)
3 Dyson J S. 1997. Ecological safety of paraquat with particular reference to soil. Planter , 73(5): 467-468, 471-474, 477-478.
4 Gao C B, Chen X G, Wei C H, et al . 2006. Quantitative evaluation of ecological security status and trends: A case study of Guangdong province, China. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 26(7): 2191-2197. (in Chinese)
5 Han B, Liu H, Wang R. 2015. Urban ecological security assessment for cities in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei metropolitan region based on fuzzy and entropy methods. Ecological Modelling , 318(7): 217-225.
6 Inshin N A. 1998. The effectiveness and ecological safety of herbicides application under maize in rotations. Agrokhimiya , 24(7): 64-68.
7 Klar N, Herrmann M, Henning-Hahn M, et al . 2012. Between ecological theory and planning practice: (Re-) Connecting forest patches for the wildcat in Lower Saxony, Germany. Landscape and Urban Planning , 105(12): 376-384.
8 Ma K M, Bo B J, Li X Y, et al . 2004. Regional ecological security pattern: concept and theoretical basis. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 24(4): 761-768.
9 Peter C, Schnlze. 1999. Overview: measures of environmental performance and ecosystem condition. Washington DC: National Academy Press , 30-56.
10 Qiu W, Zhao Q L, Li S, et al . 2008. Ecological security evaluation of Heilongjiang province with Pressure-State-Response model. Environment Science , 29(4): 1148-1152. (in Chinese)
11 Ren Z Y, Huang Q, LI J. 2005. Quantitative analysis of dynamic change and spatial difference of the ecological safety: The case of Shanxi province. Acta Geographica Sinica , 60(5): 597-606. (in Chinese)
12 Samersov V, Trepashko L. 1998. Power consumption of systems of plant protection as criterion of their ecological safety. Archives of Phytopathology and Plant Protection , 31(4): 335-340.
13 Shi P J, Jiang Y, Wang J G, et al . 2004. LUCC and ecosystem security. Beijing: Science Press, 5-9.
14 Sun C Z, Chen X T, Chen X J. 2016. Evaluation and hot spots identification of shallow groundwater contamination risk in the lower reaches of the Liaohe River plain, Journal of Resources and Ecology, 7(1): 51-60. (in Chinese)
15 Tian J, Wang Z X, Wang C R. 2011. Study on ecological security evaluation of Chao Lake River Basin[J]. Ecological Science , 30(6): 650-658. (in Chinese)
16 Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al . 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 29(4): 375-390.
17 Wang Z Q, Yu L, Zhang B, et al . 2006. Land use cover change and responses of agricultural ecosecurity in west Jilin province. Journal of Natural Resources , 28(4): 58-64. (in Chinese)
18 Wei X P. 2010. Ecological safety evaluation of Three Gorges Reservoir area in Chongqing with the Pressure-State-Response model. Progress in Geography , 29(9): 1095-1099. (in Chinese)
19 Wu G Q. 2001. Study on ecological safety and its evaluation of regional agricultural sustainable development. Journal of Natural Resources , 16(3): 227-233. (in Chinese)
20 Xiao D N, Chen W B, Guo F L. 2002. On the basic concepts and contents of ecological security. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology , 13(3): 354- 358. (in Chinese)
21 Xiao R B, Ouyang Z Y, Hang Y S, et al . 2004. Ecological security assessment of Hainan island[J]. Journal of Natural Resources , 9(6): 769-775. (in Chinese)
22 Xue L, Ren Z Y. 2010. Spatial and temporal evoluation of ecological security in Guanzhong region based on spatial Markov chain. Ecology and Environmental Sciences , 20(1): 114-118. (in Chinese)
23 Yuan L, Lei G P, Zhang X H, et al . 2009. Evaluation of land ecological security in resource based cities: A case study of Daqing. Areal Research and Development , 28(6): 80-85. (in Chinese)
24 Zhang J Y, Su W C, Zhang F T. 2011. Regional land ecological security evaluation in the case of Chongqing Three Gorges Reservoir ecological economy area based on the PSR model. China Environmental Science , 31(6): 1039-1044. (in Chinese)
25 Zhang X H, Lei G P, Yuan L, et al . 2009. Evaluation of land ecological security in Heilongjiang province. China Population, Resources and Environment , 19(1): 88-93. (in Chinese)
26 Zhang J A, Luo S M. 2004. Discussion on the agricultural ecological security and its management countermeasures. Chinese Journal of Ecology , 23(6): 59-62.
27 Zhu H Y, Yang G S, Dong Y W. 2004. Protection and evaluation of ecological security of source areas of drinking water along Yangtze River in Jiangsu Province. Resources Science , 26(6): 90-96.
28 Zuo W, Zhou H Z, Wang Q, et al . 2004. Comprehensive assessment and mapping of the regional ecological safety. Acta Pedologica Sinica , 41(2): 203-209.