Agricultural land provides not only food and fiber (an important element of food security), but also serves as a non-market commodity with characteristic externalities and public services. However, there are also many negative impacts on environment of the paddy production. Thus, Payments for paddy ecosystem services encourage farmers to engage in ecological or organic agricultural practices and agro-ecological/environmental supply. However, compared with forest, wetland, and pasture, the eco-function and ecosystem services of paddy fields have gotten insufficient attention. It is necessary to establish an eco-compensation mechanism for paddy fields that boosts behavior that protects farms to benefit the ecosystem. Based on a review of eco-compensation for paddy fields, this paper proposes the policy game framework of eco-compensation for paddy fields, which is oriented to ecological restoration. Secondly, this paper introduces methods for determination of compensation standards, including the cost the farmers’ willingness to accept, and the ecological benefits of adopting environmental friendly farming practices. And finally, this paper puts forward policy recommendations for eco-compensation for paddy ecosystems.
XIONG Ying, LIU Moucheng, PANG Shiming, SUN Yehong
. Study of Ecological Compensation for Paddy Fields: Oriented towards Eco-environmental Restoration[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017
, 8(6)
: 613
-619
.
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.06.007
1 Adalberto V, Alves B, Le Y, et al . 2002. Payment for environmental services: Brazil. Report to FORD Foundation project “Payment for Environmental services in the Americas” .
2 Cai Y Y, Zhang A L. 2011. Agricultural land's ecological compensation criteria based on the producers' willingness to accept: a case study of farmer households in Wuhan. Journal of Natural Resources , 26(2): 177 - 189. (in Chinese)
3 China Ecological Compensation Mechanism and Policy Research Group. 2008. China Ecological Compensation Mechanism and Policy Research. Beijing: Science Publishing. (in Chinese)
4 Costanza R., d’Arge R., de-Groot R, et al . 1997. The value of the worlds’ ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature , 387: 253-260.
5 Derissen S, Latacz-Lohmann U. 2013. What are PES? A review of definitions and an extension. Ecosystem Services, 6: 12 - 15.
6 FAO. 2007. The State of Food and Agriculture. FAO. [http:∥www. fao. org/catalog/inter-e.htm]
7 Francisco H A. 2003. Environmental service payments: experience, constraints and potential in Philippines. http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/sea.
8 Gao M, Zhang L, Wei C F, et al . 2004. Study of the changes of the rice yield and soil fertility on the paddy field under long-term no-tillage and ridge culture conditions. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science , 10(4): 343 - 348. (in Chinese)
9 Greenley, Douglas A. Walsh, Richard G. Young, Robert A. 1982. Economic Benefits of Improved Water Quality: Public Perceptions of Option and Preservation Values. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
10 Jin J S. 2011. Study on Ecological Compensation for Agriculture in China[D]. Jilin University. (in Chinese)
11 Landell-Mills N. and I. Porras. 2002. Silver Bullet or Fool’s Gold? A Global Review of Markets for Forest Environmental Services and Their Impacts on the Poor. International Institute for Environment and Development.
12 Li H X, Lu W S, Liu Y J, et al . 2001. Effect of different tillage methods on rice growth and soil ecology. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology , 12(4): 553 - 55. (in Chinese)
13 Li W H, Li F, Li S D, et al . 2006. The Status and prospect of forest ecological benefit compensation. Journal of Natural Resources , 21(5): 677 - 688. (in Chinese)
14 Li W H, Liu M C, Min Q W. 2010. Progress and perspectives of China’s ecological agriculture. Resources Science , 32(6): 1015 - 1021. (in Chinese)
15 Li W H, Liu M C, Min Q W. 2011. China's ecological agriculture: progress and perspectives. Journal of Recourses and Ecology , 2(1): 289 - 299.
16 Li W H, Liu M C, Zhang D. 2009. Tradeoff analysis on comprehensive valuation of traditional agriculture and rice monocropping in Zhejiang. Resources Science , 31(6): 899 - 904. (in Chinese)
17 Li W H, Liu M C. 2010. Several strategic thoughts on China’s eco-compensation mechanism. Resources Science , 32(5): 791 - 796. (in Chinese)
18 LI X G, Miao H, Zheng Hua, et al . 2009. Main methods for setting ecological compensation standard and their application. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 29(8): 4431 - 4440. (in Chinese)
19 Liu M C, Lun F, Zhang C Q, Li W H. Standards of payments for paddy ecosystem services：using Hani Terrace as case study. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture , 2012, 20(6): 703 - 709. (in Chinese)
20 Liu M C, Xiong Y, Lun F. 2014. The enlightenment to Chinese GIAHS conservation from EU agricultural eco-compensation. World Agriculture , (6): 83 - 88. (in Chinese)
21 Liu M C, Xiong Y, Yuan Z, et al . 2014. Standards of ecological compensation for traditional eco-agriculture: taking rice-fish system in Hani Terrace as an example. Journal of Mountain Science , 11(4): 1049 - 1059.
22 Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, et al . Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey. Ecological Economics , (33): 103 - 117.
23 Pang S M, Sun Y H, Wei Y J, et al . 2015. The economic analysis on GIAHS Dynamic Conservation——A case study of Yunnan Hani Rice Terraces system. World Agriculture , (11): 101 - 106. (in Chinese)
24 Qin Y H, Kang M Y. 2007. A review of ecological compensation and its improvement measures. Journal of Natural Resources , 22(4): 557 - 566. (in Chinese)
25 Ren Y, Feng D F, Yu H. 2008. The Theory and Policy Framework of Eco- compensation in China. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press. (in Chinese)
26 Sun Y H, Mary Jane D C, Min Q W, et al . 2013. Conserving agricultural heritage systems through tourism: exploration of two mountainous communities in China. Journal of Mountain Science , 10(6): 962 - 975.
27 Turner R K., Daily G C. 2008. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental Resource Economics , (39): 25 - 35.
28 Wang J N, Wan J, Zhang H Y. 2006. Some opinions on Chinese eco-compensation policies. Environmental Protection , (19): 24 - 28. (in Chinese)
29 Wang O, Song H Y. 2005. Discussion on agricultural eco-compensation establishment. Problem of Agricultural Economy , (6): 22 - 28. (in Chinese)
30 Wu X Q, Tuo Z Y, Yang C M. 2002. A probe into ecological compensation mechanism in conservation areas of China. Scientific and Technological Management of Land and Resources ,19(2): 18 - 21. (in Chinese)
31 Xie G D, Xiao Y, Zhen L, et al . 2005. Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture , 13(3): 10 - 13. (in Chinese)
32 Xu Y C, Shen Q R, Ran W. 2002. Effects of zero-tillage and application of manure on soil microbial biomass C, N, and P after sixteen Years of cropping. Acta Pedologica Sinica , 39(1): 89 - 95. (in Chinese)
33 Yin F, Mao R Z, Fu B J, et al . 2006. Farmland ecosystem service and its formation mechanism. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 17(5): 929 - 934. (in Chinese)
34 Zhang D, Min Q W, Liu M C, et al . 2012. Ecosystem service tradeoff between traditional and modern agriculture: A case study in Congjiang County, Guizhou Province, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China , 6(5): 743 - 752
35 Zhang H Y, Liu G H. 2006. The design for basin eco-compensation in China. Environmental Protection , (19): 49 - 54. (in Chinese)
36 Zhen L, Min Q W, Li W H, et al . 2006. Socio-economic impact and eco- Compensation mechanism in natural reserves of Hainan province. Resources Science , 28(6): 10 - 18. (in Chinese)
