Enhancing Households’ Economic Benefits through Wetlands Friendly Investment Model: A Case of Ndembera River Valley, Tanzania

  • 1. Institute of Resource Assessment, University of Dar es Salaam, Dar es Salaam, P. O. Box 35097, Tanzania;
    2. Institute of Development Studies, Mzumbe University, Mzumbe, P. O. Box 83, Tanzania

Received date: 2017-07-06

  Revised date: 2017-09-18

  Online published: 2017-11-30

Supported by

Flemish Interuniversity Council (VLIR-UOS) and Mzumbe University of Tanzania


The Wetlands Friendly Investments model has been used to conserve wetland resources and improve rural livelihoods in Tanzania since 2003. Nevertheless, studies’ linking this model to households’ economy is lacking. This paper attempts to examine the households’ economic benefits from the implementation of the activities which are part of the model. A total of 174 intervention households in Ndembera Valley were surveyed using questionnaire. The interviews and transect walk complemented households data. Template, descriptive statistics, t tests and regressions in SPSS ver.20 software were used in the analysis. Results show the difference of annual gross income because of the wetland investment model is about USD 732.0. This study demonstrates that wetland resources could be conserved and utilized using local incentive models. Similar techniques could be applied for related studies elsewhere. Socio-economic factors should be considered for holistic impact of the model on household poverty reduction.

Cite this article

Norbert John Ngowi, Agnes Godfrey Mwakaje . Enhancing Households’ Economic Benefits through Wetlands Friendly Investment Model: A Case of Ndembera River Valley, Tanzania[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017 , 8(6) : 605 -612 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.06.006


1 Bekele S. 2011. Matching socioeconomic and ecological need in wetland management using systems approach: The case of Cheffa wetlands in Ethiopia[D]. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
2 Brooks J, S Mccluskey, E Turkey, et al . 2015. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qual Res Psychol. 12(2):202-222.
3 Creswell J, V Clark. 2007. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Aust NZJ J Public Health, 31: 388.
4 Dvorak W S. 1996. Species descriptions, Pinus tecunumanii, Eguiluz & J. P. Perry. 4p.Central America and Mexico Coniferous Resources Cooperative (CAMCORE). Department of Forestry, North Carolina State University, USA..
5 Ernst & Young. 2010. Value for money audit for Participatory Forest Management and Sustainable Wetlands Management Programme[R]. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
6 Gray M J, H M Hagy, J A Nyman, et al . 2013 Management of wetlands for wildlife. In: Anderson J, C Davis (eds.). Wetland Techniques. Volume 3. Applications and Management, 121-180. Springer, Dordrecht.
7 Hassan H K, P K T Munishi. 2009. Contribution of wetlands to household income and food security in the Nyumba ya Mungu wetland system, Northern Tanzania, TJFNC, 79(2): 99-108.
8 Institute of Resource Assessment. 2002. Assessing and mapping wetland types and their distribution[R]. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
9 Iringa District Council. 2013. Iringa Rural District Council Socio-economic Profile[R]. Iringa, Tanzania.
10 Israel G D. 1992. Sampling the evidence of extension program impact. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agriculture Sciences, EDIS.
11 Kassenga G R. 1997. A descriptive assessment of the wetlands of the Lake Victoria basin in Tanzania. J. Resour. Conser. Recy , 20(2): 127-141.
12 Kasthaala G, A Hepelwa, H Hamiss, et al. 2008. An integrated assessment of the biodiversity, livelihood and economic value of wetlands in Mtanza-Msona Village, Tanzania, 156p. The International Union for the Conservation of Nature, Dar es Salaam.
13 Kemkes R J. 2015. The role of natural capital in sustaining livelihoods in remote mountainous regions: The case of Upper Svaneti, Republic of Georgia. Ecol. Econ , 117: 22-31.
14 Kyando F E. 2007. Impact of valley bottom cultivation (vinyungu) on poverty alleviation in Mtitu River Basin, Kilolo District, Iringa Tanzania[D], Sokoine University of Agriculture.
15 Lamsal P, K P Pant, L Kumar, et al. 2015. Sustainable livelihoods through conservation of wetland resources: A case of economic benefits from Ghodaghodi Lake, western Nepal. Eco. Soc , 20(1): 1-11..
16 Magembe L. 2007. Transformation of Valley-bottom Cultivation and its Effects on Tanzanian Wetlands: A case study of Ndembera Wetland Area in Iringa Region[D], University of Florida.
17 Majamba H I. 2004 Implementing the Ramsar Conention in Tanzania. Salient features of legislation and policies for the management and conservation of wetlands. East Afr. L. J, 95: 1-35.
18 Matthews G V T. 1993. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands: its history and development. Luthi D (eds.), Imprimerie Dupuis SA, CH-1348 Le Brassus, Switzerland.
19 McCartney M, L M Rebelo, S Sellamuttu, et al . 2010. Wetlands, agriculture and poverty reduction: International Water Management Institute. 39p. (IWMI Research Report 137). Colombo, Sri Lanka.
20 Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism and Ministry of Foreign Affairs Denmark. 2003. Sustainable Wetlands Management (2004-2009)[R]. Ref.No.104.Tanzania.1.MFS.23. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
21 Mndeme D R. 2016. The impacts of payment for environmrntal services on communities' livelihoods: The case of Uluguru mountains, Morogoro Region[D], University of Dar es Salaam.
22 Mombo F, S. Speelman, G Van Huylenbroeck, et al . 2011. Ratification of the Ramsar Convention and sustainable wetlands management?: Situation analysis of the Kilombero Valley wetlands in Tanzania. J. Agric. Ex. Rural Dev , 3(9): 153-164.
23 Munns A K, B F Bjeirmi. 1996. The role of project management in achieving project success, Int. J. Proj. Manage , 14(2): 81-87.
24 National Bureau of Standard. 2013. 2012 Population and housing census. Population distribution by administrative areas. Ministry of Finance. [R]. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
25 Nile Basin Initiatives (NBI). 2013. Wetland management strategy. Entebbe, Uganda. Retrieved from
26 Nwankwoala H O. 2011. The role of communities in improved rural water supply systems in Nigeria: management model and its implications for vision 20: 2020. JATES , 1(3): 295-302.
27 Ramsar Convention Secretariat. 2010. Wise use of wetlands: Concepts and approaches for the wise use of wetlands. Ramsar handbooks for the wise use of wetlands, 4 th edition. Pritchard D (eds.). Gland, Switzerland.
28 Salum A. 2007. Sustainable Wetland Management in Tanzania-A case study of Malagarasi-Muyovosi Ramsar site[D], Roskilde University.
29 XIE Dong,ZHOU Hengjie,JI Haiting, et al . 2013. Ecological Restoration of Degraded Wetlands in China. J. Resourc. Ecol , 4(1): 63-69.
30 Siima S B, P K T Munishi, Y M Ngaga, et al . 2012. Estimating direct use value of Kilombero ramsar site based on market price method. TJFNC , 81(2): 133-146.
31 Turner R K, J C J M van den Bergh, T Söderqvist, et al . 2000. Ecological economic analysis of wetlands: scientific integration for management and policy. Ecol Econ , 35(1): 7-23.
32 Zedler J, Kercher S. 2005. Wetland resources: status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour, 30: 39-74 .