Ecosystem Assessment

Effects of Thinning Intensity on Carbon Stocks and Changes in Larch Forests in China Northeast Forest Region

  • 1. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Science and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
    2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3. Puyang Meteorological Bureau, Puyang, Henan 457000, China

Received date: 2017-05-31

  Online published: 2017-09-27

Supported by

Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA05050203); Knowledge Innovation Projects of Significant Directions of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KZCX2-YW-Q1-05)


Thinning represents an important and frequently used silvicultural technique that improves forest wood products and has obvious effects on forest carbon stocks and stock changes. Here, we used the carbon budget model CBM-CFS3 to simulate the effects of thinning on carbon storage and changes in larch forest ecosystems under thirteen thinning scenarios. Simulation results demonstrate that strong thinning greatly reduces the biomass carbon density of larch forests compared to non-thinning forests. The minimum and maximum average biomass carbon density, respectively, were 30.3 tC ha-1 and 47.8 tC ha-1, a difference of 58% under set scenarios in the simulated time scale. The dead organic matter (including soil) carbon density increased in all thinned larch forests stands, compared with non-thinning stands, and the pattern of variation was opposite to that found for biomass carbon density. However, the total ecosystem carbon density of larch forests declined with thinning because the increase in dead organic matter carbon is insufficient to offset the loss of biomass carbon caused by thinning. Thus, strong thinning can transform larch forest ecosystems from carbon sinks into carbon sources. Future work should consider the carbon sequestered in wood materials acquired via thinning and their use as substitutes for other construction materials with less favorable lifecycle carbon footprints, such as steel, cement, aluminum and PVC.

Cite this article

LI Shuyong, LI Shenggong, HUANG Mei . Effects of Thinning Intensity on Carbon Stocks and Changes in Larch Forests in China Northeast Forest Region[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2017 , 8(5) : 538 -544 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2017.05.011


[1] Alvarez S, Ortiz C, Díaz-Pinés E, et al . 2016. Influence of tree species composition, thinning intensity and climate change on carbon sequestration in Mediterranean mountain forests: a case study using the CO 2 -Fix model. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 21(7): 1045-1058.
[2] Baskent E Z, Keles S, Kadıoğullar S, et al. 2011. Quantifying the effects of forest management strategies on the production of forest values: timber, carbon, oxygen, water, and soil. Environmental Modeling & Assessment , 16(2): 145-152.
[3] Brown M E, Funk C. 2008. Food security under climate change. Science , 319(5863): 580-581.
[4] Epstein P R. 2005. Climate change and human health. New England Journal of Medicine , 353(14): 1433-1436.
[5] Forest Resources Management Department of State Forestry Administration (SFA). 2010. Forest resources statistics of China-the seventh national forest resources inventory. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House. (in Chinese)
[6] Haines A, Kovats R S, Campbell-Lendrum D, et al . 2006. Climate change and human health: Impacts, vulnerability and public health. Public Health , 120(7): 585-596.
[7] IPCC. 2001. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Houghton J T, Ding Y, Griggs D J, et al. (Eds.). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Kull S J, Rampley G J, Morken S, et al . 2011. Operational-scale Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS3) version 1.2: user’s guide (eds.). Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Services, Northern Forest Center, Edmonton, AB.
[9] Kurz W A, Dymond C C, White T M, et al . 2008. CBM-CFS3: A model of carbon-dynamics in forestry and land-use change implementing IPCC standards. Ecological Modelling, 220(4): 480-504.
[10] Lal R. 2005. Forest soils and carbon sequestration. Forest Ecology & Management , 220(1-3): 242-258.
[11] Li C, Liu S R, Zhang Y D, et al . 2008. Forest management and carbon sink dynamics: a study in boreal and sub-alpine forest regions. In: Lafortezza R, Chen J, Sanesi G (eds.). Patterns and Processes in Forest Landscapes: Multiple Use and Sustainable Management. Dordrecht: Springer, 323-340.
[12] Li S Y. 2015. Carbon stocks and Management Strategies for Enhancing Carbon Sequestration of Forest Ecosystems in the Forest Region of Northeast China. PhD diss., University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)
[13] Malmsheimer R. 2013. Managing forests because carbon matters: Integrating energy, products, and land management policy. Journal of Forestry , 111(1): 10-10.
[14] National Development and Reform Commission Response to Climate Change Division (NDRC). 2013. The second national communication of the People's Republic of China on climate change. Beijing: China Economic Publishing House.
[15] Pan, Y., Birdsey, R.A., Fang, J., et al . 2011 A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science , 333, 988-993.
[16] Peng C, Zhou X, Zhao S, et al . 2009. Quantifying the response of forest carbon balance to future climate change in northeastern china: model validation and prediction. Global & Planetary Change , 66(3-4): 179- 194.
[17] Ruiz-Peinado R, Bravo-Oviedo A, Montero G, et al . 2016. Carbon stocks in a Scots pine afforestation under different thinning intensities management. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change , 21(7): 1059-1072.
[18] Sasaki N, Chheng K, Ty S. 2012. Managing production forests for timber production and carbon emission reductions under the REDD plus scheme. Environmental Science & Policy , 23: 35-44.
[19] Schmidhuber J, Tubiello F N. 2007. Global food security under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(50): 19703-19708.
[20] Shen G F. 2001(1st). Silviculture. Beijing: China Forestry Publishing House, 281-305. (in Chinese)
[21] Tan K, Piao S L, Peng C H, et al . 2007. Satellite-based estimation of biomass carbon stocks for northeast China's forests between 1982 and 1999. Forest Ecology and Management , 240(1-3): 114-121.
[22] Thürig E, Kaufmann E. 2010. Increasing carbon sinks through forest management: a model-based comparison for Switzerland with its Eastern Plateau and Eastern Alps. European Journal of Forest Research , 129(4): 563-572.
[23] UNFCCC. 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Document UNFCCC/CP/1997/7/Add.1.
[24] Wang Z H, Liu H M, Wang X J, et al. 2011. Progress of management on carbon storage of forest ecosystems. Journal of Northwest A&F University , 39(1): 83-88. (in Chinese)
[25] Wei Y W, Zhou W M, Yu D P, et al. 2014. Carbon storage of forest vegetation under the Natural Forest Protection Program in Northeast China. Acta Ecologica Sinica , 34(20): 5696-5705. (in Chinese)
[26] Yu, G.R., Li, X.R., Wang, Q.F. et al. , 2010 Carbon storage and its spatial pattern of terrestrial ecosystem in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology , 1, 97-109.
[27] Zasada M, Bronisz K, Bijak S, et al . 2009. Effect of the cutting age and thinning intensity on biomass and carbon sequestration-the Gubin forest district case study. Folia Forestalia Polonica , 51(2): 18-24.
[28] Zhang J M, Cai F Q, He T K. 1995. Pedogeography of China. Beijing: Commercial Press. (in Chinese)
[29] Zwiers F W, Weaver A J. 2000. The causes of 20th century warming. Science , 290(5499): 2081-2083.