Orginal Article

The Silk Road Economic Belt and Green Growth in the East of Russia

  • 1. Department for ecological economics, Institute of Natural Resources, Ecology and Cryology of the Siberian branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Chita 672014, Russia;
    2. Transbaikal State University, Chita 672039, Russia

Received date: 2016-03-21

  Online published: 2016-09-20

Supported by

Siberian Branch of Russian Academy of Sciences (Project IX.88.1.6; )


The Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB) opens new development opportunities for Russia in general, and its Eastern regions in particular, via larger-scale and multi-level international cooperation. The eastern regions of Russia, rich in natural resources, have traditionally focused on resource extraction. In the context of the SREB, the issues of environmental security in Eastern Russia come to the fore. Here, we propose tools for ‘diagnosis’ if a chosen path of regional economic development proceeds according to the concept of a green economy. We use different indicators based on eco-intensity. We determine ecological-economic development trends in the Eastern border regions of Russia at the initial stage of the Silk Road Economic Belt formation to serve as a starting point and guideline for development processes within the SREB. If cooperation is directed to implementing the best Chinese production chains, significant improvements in the quality of economic growth in Russia will be achieved.

Cite this article

GLAZYRINA Irina, ZABELINA Irina . The Silk Road Economic Belt and Green Growth in the East of Russia[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016 , 7(5) : 342 -351 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.05.004


1 Baumgartner S, M Faber, J L R Proops. 2002. How environmental concerns influences the investment decision: an application of capital theory. Ecological Economics, 40(1): 1-12.
2 Daly H E, J Farley. 2004. Ecological Economics. Principles and Applications. Washington: Island Press, 1-488.
3 De Boer Y., J Meier, S Bickersteth. 2014. Green Growth in Practice: Green Growth Best practice Initiative.
4 De Haan M. 2004. Accounting for goods and bads. Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands, 1-216.
5 Dong S, Z Li, Y Li, et al . 2015. Resources, environment and economic patterns and sustainable development modes of the Silk Road Economic Belt. Journal of Resources and Ecology , 6(2): 65-72.
6 Farley J, R Costanza. 2010. Payments for ecosystem services: From local to global. Ecological Economics , 69(11): 2069-2074.
7 Farley J. 2012. Ecosystem services: The economic debate. Ecosystem services , 1: 40-49.
8 Glazyrina I P, I A Zabelina, E A Klevakina. 2014. Ecological component of economic development: The border regions China and Russia. EKO , 6: 5-24. (in Russian)
9 Glazyrina I P, L M Faleichik, K A Yakovleva. 2015. Socioeconomic effectiveness and “green” growth of regional forest use. Geography and Natural Resources , 36(4): 327-334.
10 Glazyrina I P. 2012. The environmental quality of growth indicators. In: Shmelev S, I Shmeleva (eds.). Sustainability analysis: An interdisciplinary approach. Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan, 279-299.
11 Glazyrina I Р, V V Glazyrin, S V Vinnichenko. 2006. The polluter pays principle and potential conflict in society. Ecological Economics , 59(3): 324-330.
12 Glazyrina Irina P and Ivan M Potravny (eds.). 2005. Environmental quality of growth indicators for regional economies. Moscow: NIA - Priroda, 1-306. (in Russian)
13 Lokosov V V, E V Ryumina, V V Ulyanov. 2015. Regional differentiation of human potential indicator. Economy of Region , 4: 185-196. (in Russian)
14 Lomakina N V. 2014. Industrial development in Russian Far East and North-Eastern China: goals and possibilities for a collaboration. EKO , 6: 40 - 55. (in Russian)
15 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2011. Towards green growth. A summary for policy makers. greengrowth/48012345.pdf.
16 Pearce D W, A Markandia, E B Barbier. 1989. Blueprint for a green economy. London: Earthscan, 1-192.
17 Rumina E V, A M Anikina. 2007. Analyzing the impact of the natural resources factor on the level of economic development of Russian regions. Studies on Russian Economic Development , 18(5): 523-538.
18 Shang Y, Y Si, G Zeng. 2015. Black or green? Economic growth patterns in China under Low Carbon Economy Targets. Journal of Resources and Ecology , 6(5): 310-317.
19 Soboleva S V, Yu A Grigoriev, N E Smirnova, et al . 2014. Peculiarities of formation of the population of border territories of Siberia. EKO, 11: 20-35. (In Russian)
20 Titova G D. 2015. Valuing ecosystem services: potential application in practice. Vestnik of Transbaikal State University , 3(118): 179-191. (in Russian)
21 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2010. Driving a green economy through public finance and fiscal policy reform. http://www.
22 United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2011. Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication.
23 Victor P A. 2015. The Kenneth E. Boulding Memorial Award 2014 Ecological economics: A personal journey. Ecological Economics , 109: 93-100.
24 Zabelina I A, E A Klevakina. 2012. Environmental and economic aspects of natural resource use and problems of cross-border cooperation in regions of Siberia. Problems of Economic Transition , 55(7): 39-48.
25 Zhang C, Liu C, Li N. 2015. Mechanisms of realizing the economic value of ecosystem services. Journal of Resources and Ecology , 6(6): 412-419.