Object-oriented Method for Rural Residential Land Extraction in the Hilly Areas of Southern China Using RapidEye Data

Expand
  • 1 State Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Information System, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3 Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application, Nanjing 210023, China

Received date: 2016-03-14

  Online published: 2016-07-25

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (41301474); National Science & Technology Infrastructure Work Special Projects of China(2011FY110400, 2013FY114600) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2013M530708, 2014T70114)

Abstract

The process of rapid urbanization in China features two opposing trends: declining rural population and increasing rural residential land, especially in southern hilly areas. The extraction and analysis of residential land in rural China represents an important application for remote sensing technology. The study aimed to discover rural residential land information using RapidEye satellite imagery, taking Taihe County as the research area in the hilly region of southern China. Based on multiple experiments, classification was conducted with an optimal image segmentation scale set to 200. The object-oriented classification rule set was constructed using the customized parameters NDVI, NDWI, brightness, and length/width. The areas of residential land and other land use types were interpreted by varying the parameter values for classification rule sets. Finally, validation and accuracy evaluations were carried out. The overall accuracy of residential land interpretation is 78.40%, and producer’s accuracy and user’s accuracy are 68.75% and 77.33%, respectively. The results indicate that RapidEye provides a suitable data source for extraction of rural residential land using an object-oriented approach. Compared with the second national land survey of China, the classification gave an absolute difference of 93.67 ha residential land within the study area. Recognition errors occurred mainly in regions adjacent to the boundaries between residential land and other types of land.

Cite this article

GAO Mengxu, WANG Juanle, BAI Zhongqiang . Object-oriented Method for Rural Residential Land Extraction in the Hilly Areas of Southern China Using RapidEye Data[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2016 , 7(4) : 291 -300 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2016.04.008

References

[1] Bruzzone L, Conese C, Maselli F, et al. 1997. Multisource classification of complex rural areas by statistical and neural-network approaches. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63(5): 523-533.
[2] Blaschke T. 2010. Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 65(1): 2-16.
[3] Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1): 37-46.
[4] Carleer A P, Debeir O, Wolff E. 2005. Assessment of very high spatial resolution satellite image segmentations. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 71(11): 1285-1294.
[5] Deng S B. 2010. ENVI Remote Sensing Image Process Methods. Beijing: Science Press. (in Chinese)
[6] eCognition Developer 8.7.2 Reference Book, 2012. Trimble Documentation, Munchen, Germany.
[7] Eitel J, Vierling L, Litvak M, et al. 2011. Broadband, red-edge information from satellites improves early stress detection in a New Mexico conifer woodland. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(12): 3640-3646.
[8] Foody G M. 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 80(1): 185-201.
[9] Friedl M A, Mciver D K, Hodges J, et al. 2002. Global land cover mapping from MODIS: algorithms and early results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83: 287-302.
[10] Gao B C. 1996. NDVI- A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment, 58(3): 257-266.
[11] Garrison T G. 2010. Remote sensing ancient Maya rural populations using Quickbird satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(1): 213-231.
[12] GB/T 21010-2007, 2007. Current Land Use Classification. Beijing, China Standards Press.
[13] Gong P, Wang J, Yu L, et al. 2013. Finer resolution observation and monitoring of global land cover: first mapping results with Landsat TM and ETM+ data. International Journal of Remote Sensing,34(7): 2607-2654.
[14] Hoymann J. 2011. Accelerating urban sprawl in depopulating regions: a scenario analysis for the Elbe River Basin, Regional Environmental Change, 11(1): 73-86.
[15] Laliberte A S, Rango A, Havstad K M, et al. 2004. Object-oriented image analysis for mapping shrub encroachment from 1937 to 2003 in southern New Mexico. Remote Sensing of Environment, 93(1): 198-210.
[16] Liu F, Zhang Z X, Wang X, et al. 2009. The dynamic monitoring of rural residential land in Beijing and driving force analysis based on multi- source remote sensing data. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 21(3): 88-93. (in Chinese)
[17] Liu Y, Yang R, Li Y. 2013a. Potential of land consolidation of hollowed villages under different urbanization scenarios in China, Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(3): 503-512.
[18] Liu Y, Lu S, Chen Y. 2013b. Spatio-temporal change of urban-rural equalized development patterns in China and its driving factors. Journal of Rural Studies,32(4): 320-330.
[19] Liu Y, Fang F, Li Y. 2014. Key issues of land use in China and implications for policy making. Land Use Policy, 40(1): 6-12.
[20] Li A Q, Zhang H, Du X, et al. 2014. County-level rice area estimation in southern China using remote sensing data. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2014, 8(4):169-186
[21] Long H L, Liu Y, Wu X, et al. 2009. Spatio-temporal dynamic patterns of farmland and rural settlements in su-xi-chang region: implications for building a new countryside in coastal China. Land Use Policy, 26(2): 322-333.
[22] Long H, Woods M. 2011. Rural restructuring under globalization in eastern coastal China: what can be learned from Wales? Journal of Rural and Community Development, 6(1): 70-94.
[23] Long H, Li Y. 2012. A commentary on the international conference on land use issues and policy in China under rapid rural and urban transformation. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 3(4): 384.
[24] Mcfeeters S K. 1996. The use of the normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(7): 1425-1432.
[25] Ming D P, Wang Q, Yang J Y. 2008. Spatial scale of remote sensing image and selection of optimal spatial resolution. Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(4): 529-537.
[26] Pu R L, Landry S, Yu Q. 2011. Object-based urban detailed land cover classification with high spatial resolution Ikonos imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(12): 3285-3308.
[27] Reuter H I, Nelson A, Jarvis A. 2007. An evaluation of void filling interpolation methods for SRTM data. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 21(9): 983-1008.
[28] Siljander M, Clark B, Pellikka P. 2011. A predictive modelling technique for human population distribution and abundance estimation using remote sensing and geospatial data in a rural mountainous area in Kenya. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(21): 5997-6023.
[29] Sim J, Wright C. 2005. The kappa statistic in reliability studies: use, interpretation, and sample size requirements. Physical Therapy, 85(3): 257-268.
[30] Song W, Liu M L. 2014. Assessment of decoupling between rural settlement area and rural population in China. Land Use Policy, 39: 331-341.
[31] Stow D, Lopez A, Lippitt C, et al. 2007. Object-based classification of residential land use within Accra, Ghana based on Quickbird satellite data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 28(22): 5167-5173.
[32] Tso B, Mather P M. 2007. Classification Methods for Remotely Sensed Data (2nd Ed.). New York: CRC Press.
[33] Turker M, Ozdarici A. 2011. Field-based crop classification using SPOT4, SPOT 5, IKONOS and QuickBird imagery for agricultural areas: a comparison study. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32(24): 9735-9768.
[34] Wang H X, Gao F, Hu X H. 2010. The research about QuickBird images ortho-rectification based on RPC models. Modern Surveying and Mapping, 33(6): 13-16. (in Chinese)
[35] Wang Q, Xu J C, Chen Y, et al. 2012. Influence of the varied spatial resolution of remote sensing images on urban and rural residential information extraction. Resources Science, 34(1): 159-165. (in Chinese)
[36] Xu B, Gong P, Seto E, et al. 2003. Comparison of gray-level reduction and different texture spectrum encoding methods for land-use classification using a panchromatic Ikonos image. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69(5): 529-536.
[37] Yang B, Du Z, Liu R, et al. 2012. Researches on generalization technology for land use mapping based on 2nd national land survey data. Remote Sensing for Land and Resources, 24(4): 107-111. (in Chinese)
[38] Yang C, Zhou C. 2001. Extracting residential area from TM image on the basis of knowledge discovered. Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 16(1): 1-6. (in Chinese)
[39] Zhang A Y, Guindon B, Li X, et al. 2014. Target-driven extraction of built-up land changes from high-resolution imagery. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 8(2):173-183.
[40] Zhou G, He Y H, Tang C, et al. 2013. Dynamic mechanism and present situation of rural settlement evolution in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 23(3): 513-524.
Outlines

/