Eco. Compensation

Responses of Ecosystems to Ecological Compensation in a Key Ecological Function Area of the Loess Plateau

  • 1. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2.University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2015-10-21

  Online published: 2015-11-25

Supported by

the National Science and Technology Support Program (2013BAC03B05); National Natural Science Foundation of China (41371486)


Evaluation of the ecological effects of eco-compensation policies helps analyze policy rationality and feasibility and provides scientific and practical bases for perfecting eco-compensation systems. Taking the key ecological function area of the Loess Plateau, China as a case study, we have evaluated ecosystem responses to the Grain-for-Green Project that commenced in 1999. Six indicators were selected to assess changes in ecosystem structure, quality and function. The results showed that implementation of the Grain-for-Green Project has reduced sloping cropland by 1571 km2 and increased ecological land by 1337 km2. The increase in ecological land alters ecosystem structures across the study area and the decline in sloping cropland reduces farming activity interference; both of these are conducive to the restoration of natural vegetation. From 2000 to 2010, the vegetation cover of grassland, desert and forest ecosystems increased 10.89%, 8.34% and 4.24% respectively and average NPP rose 51%, with an average annual growth rate of around 5%. This indicates that eco-compensation has promoted the improvement of ecosystem quality. Total biomass of ecosystems increased two times on average from 2000 to 2010, meaning that the carbon sequestration capacity of ecosystems also increased. The reduction in the area of water loss and soil erosion and the increase in retained runoff by forests indicate an improvement in ecosystem function and services on the Loess Plateau.

Cite this article

LU Chunxia, YU Fuqin, LIU Xiaojie, Dhruba Bijaya G. C. . Responses of Ecosystems to Ecological Compensation in a Key Ecological Function Area of the Loess Plateau[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015 , 6(6) : 369 -374 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2015.06.004


[2] Alix-Garcia J, A de Janvry, E Sadoulet. 2008. The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services. Environment and Development Economics, 13: 375-394.
[3] Babcock B, P G Lakshminarayan, Wu J, D Zilberman. 1996. The economics of a public fund for environmental amenities: A study of CRP contracts. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78: 961-971.
[4] Baylis K, S Peplow, G Rausserc, L Simon. 2008. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 753-764.
[5] Bennett M T. 2008. China’s sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics, 65(4): 699-711.
[6] Chen C C, Xie Y H, Zhang Y, et al. 2005. Discussion on evaluation index system on benefit of returning farmland construction in regional land. Protection Forest Science and Technology, 19(8): 16-22. (in Chinese)
[7] Cheng L S. 2011. Comprehensive benefit evaluation on Grain for Green Project in the North Loess Plateau of Shaanxi Province: A case of six counties in the South Yulin City. Beijing: Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)
[8] Claassen R, A Cattaneo, R Johansson. 2008. Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 737-752.
[9] Dobbs T L, J N Pretty. 2004. Agri-environmental stewardship schemes and multi-functionality. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26: 220.
[10] Dobbs T L, J Pretty. 2008. Case study of agri-environmental payments: the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 765-775.
[11] Engel S, S Pagiola, S Wunder. 2008. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 663-674.
[12] Gulnur Sabirhazi G, Yin L K, Rahmuttula Adil, et al. 2004. Evaluation on the compositive ecological benefits of withdrawing from farming to afforesting and grass planting in the middle and lower reaches of the Tarim River: A case study in 33rd Regiment, Second Division, Xinjiang Group Company of Production and Construction. Arid Zone Research, 21(2): 161-165. (in Chinese)
[13] Hackl F, G Pruckner. 1997. Towards more efficient compensation programs for tourists benefits from agriculture in Europe. Environment and Resource Economics, 10: 189-205.
[14] Hou N. 2003. Benefit of conceding the cultivated land to forestry (grass) in Datong County of Qinghai Province. Forestry Economic Review, (3): 28-30. (in Chinese)
[15] Lai Y F, Zhu Q K, Zang Y Q, et al. 2006. Valuing ecological effects of land conversion project in Wuqi County. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 20(3): 83-87.
[16] Liu L M, Li L, Lai M. 2005. Benefit of cropland conversion program and its evaluation in western China. Ecology and Environment, 14 (5): 794-797. (in Chinese)
[17] Man M J, Luo J C. 2006. Evaluation of eco-economic benefit of farmland returned for woodland in Shaanxi Province. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 34(18): 4735-4737. (in Chinese)
[18] Pagiola S. 2008. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 712-724.
[19] Peng H, Cheng G., Xu z, et al. 2007. Social, economic, and ecological impacts of the “Grain for Green” project in China: A preliminary case in Zhangye, Northwest China. Journal of Environmental Management, 85: 774-784.
[20] Richard C. 2003. Substitution and scalar politics: Negotiating environmental compensation in Cardiff Bay. Journal of Geoforum, 34(3): 343-358.
[21] SFA (The State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China). 2003. Sloping land conversion program plan (2001-2010). Beijing: China Forestry Press. (in Chinese)
[22] SFA (The State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China). 2008. A report for monitoring and assessment of the socio-economic impacts of China’s key forestry programs. Beijing: China Forestry Press. (in Chinese)
[23] SFA (The State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China). 2013. A report for monitoring and assessment of the socio-economic impacts of China’s key forestry programs. Beijing: China Forestry Press. (in Chinese)
[24] Sierra R, E Russman. 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 59: 131-141.
[25] Song F Q, Yang G H, Feng Y Z. 2007. Research and establishment of the multi-effect assessment index system of the returning farmland to forest project in different ecological zones of Loess Plateau. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 25(3): 169-174. (in Chinese)
[26] Sun H Y, Wang C Y, Niu Z, et al. 1998. Analysis of the vegetation cover change and the relationship between NDVI and environmental factors by using NOAA time series data. Journal of Remote Sensing, 2(3): 204-210. (in Chinese)
[27] Uchida E, Xu J T, S Rozelle. 2005. Grain for green: Cost -effectiveness and sustainability of China’s conservation set aside program. Land Economics, 81 (2) :247-2641.
[28] Zbinden S, Lee D. 2005. Paying for environmental services: An analysis of participation in Costa Rica’s PSA Program. World Development, 33: 255-272.
[29] Zhang Z X, Wang X, Wang C Y. 2009. National land cover mapping by remote sensing under the control of interneted data. Journal of Geo-Informations Science, 11(2): 216-224. (in Chinese)