Identifying and Mapping Wetland-based Ecotourism Areas in the First Meander of the Yellow River: Incorporating Tourist Preferences

  • 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3 College of Liberal Arts, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China

Received date: 2014-04-24

  Revised date: 2014-11-13

  Online published: 2015-01-18

Supported by

National Natural Science Fund of China (No. 4130141, 41171435), and Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No. LY13D010007).


We identified and mapped ecotourism areas in the First Meander of the Yellow River (FMYR) by incorporating tourist preferences, and regional division was also conducted. Considering wetland protection and local natural worship, we identified available ecotourism areas and used GIS to overlay six layers of the criteria to generate a suitability map of available areas. This process incorporated the opinions of 158 tourists to weight each criterion. Available areas were classified into five levels of suitability, with class I being the least suitable for ecotourism and class V being the most suitable. Distance from water area was found to be the most important criterion, and presence of forest to be the least important. The results show that a majority of the FMYR is class II, III or IV. FMYR was further divided into five sub-regions, and it is clear that the particular ecological characteristics and service functions of each sub-region warrant particular development. This study provides useful insights for tourism planners, local managers and visitors.

Cite this article

ZHANG Aiping, ZHONG Linsheng, XU Yong, DANG Lijuan, ZHOU Bin . Identifying and Mapping Wetland-based Ecotourism Areas in the First Meander of the Yellow River: Incorporating Tourist Preferences[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2015 , 6(1) : 21 -29 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2015.01.003


Boyd S W, Butler R W, Haider W, et al. 1994. Identifying areas for ecotourism in Northern Ontario: application of a geographical information system methodology. Journal of Applied Recreation Research, 19 (1):41- 66.
Bunruamkaew K, Murayama Y. 2011. Site suitability evaluation for ecotourism using GIS & AHP: a case study of Surat Thani province, Thailand. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, (21):269-278.
Butler R W. 1999. Sustainable tourism: A state-of-the-art review. Tourism Ggeographies,1(1):7-25.
Ceballos-Lascurain H. 1987. The future of ecotourism. Mexico Journal, 1(17):13-19.
Dhami I, Deng J, Burns R C, et al. 2014. Identifying and mapping forest-based ecotourism areas in West Virginia Incorporating visitors' preferences. Tourism Management, 42(6):165-176. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.11.007
Dhami I, Deng J. 2010. Classification of forest-based ecotourism areas in Pocahontas County of West Virginia using GIS and Pairwise Comparison. Proceedings of the 2010 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium. Fung T, Wong F K K. 2007. Ecotourism planning using multiple criteria evaluation with GIS. Geocarto International, 22(2): 87-105.
Hummel J. 1994. Ecotourism development in protected areas of developing countries. World leisure & recreation, 36(2):17-23.
Kumari S, Behera M D, Tewari HR. 2010. Identification of potential ecotourism sites in West District, Sikkim using geospatial tools. Tropical Ecology, 51(1):75-85.
Li H Q, Hou L C, Xiao Y J, et al. 2009. Evaluation on ecotourism suitability in frangile environment of loess plateau based on RS and GIS-exampled on Zhongyang county, Shanxi province. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 34(6):300-302. (in Chinese)
Li J Y, Hu M Y, Yan H W, et al. 2010. Ecolgical suitability evaluation for ecotourism in Qiqanshan area based on landscape visual sensitivity. Journal of Northwest Forest University, 25(5):194-198. (in Chinese)
Mahdavi F, Dehghani M, Afshin D. 2012. Determining the ecological potential and power of Roudan city for ecotourism application using Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM). Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences. 2(6)224-231.
Pourebrahim S, Hadipour M, Bin Mokhtar M. 2011. Integration of spatial suitability analysis for land use planning in coastal areas; case of Kuala Langat District, Selangor, Malaysia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101(1), 84-97.
Saaty T L. 1990. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1):9-26.1990.
Sarvazad A, Qadykolayy J O, Hosseini-Nasr S M. 2013. Determining the Potential of Bistoon Forest Park using hierarchical analysis method (AHP). International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production, 4 (9):2399-2403.
The International Ecotourism Society. 2006. Fact sheet: Global ecotourism. Vincent V C. 2002. Assessing community support and sustainability for ecotourism development. Journal of Travel Research, 41(2):153-160.
Wang Y L. 2010. Analyses of modern snowline and its influential factors in the Tibet. Lanzhou: Lanzhou university. (in Chinese)
Yao Y B, Wang R Y, Yin D, et al. 2007. The causes of grassland degradation and corresponding prevention strategies: a case study in Maqu county. Resources Science, 29(4):127-133. (in Chinese)
Zhang G H, Liu J, Wan R. 2008. Functional zoning of island tourism in Qingdao. Resources Science, 30(8):1155-1161. (in Chinese)
Zhong L S, Tang C C, Guo H. 2010. Tourism function zoning of Jinyintan grassland scenic area in Qinghai province based on ecological sensitivity analysis. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 21(7): 1813-1819. (in Chinese)
Zhong L S, Xiao D N, Zhao S D. 2002. Ecotourism suitability evaluation: The case of Wusuli River National Forest Park. Journal of Natural Resources, 17(1):71-77. (in Chinese)
Zhong L S, Zhao S D, Xiang B H. 2003. Principle and Method about Ecotourism Planning. Beijing: Chemistry Industry Press. (in Chinese)