Exploring Factors Affecting Farmers' Implementation of Wildlife-friendly Farming on Sado Island, Japan

  • 1 Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan;
    2 Faculty of Economics, Konan University, 8-9-1 Okamoto, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658-8501, Japan;
    3 Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science, University of Tokyo 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan;
    4 United Nations University, 5-53-70 Jingumae, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo 150-8925, Japan;
    5 Center for Toki and Ecological Restoration (CTER), Niigata University, Niibo-katagami, Sado 952-0103, Japan;
    6 Institute of Nature and Environmental Technology (K-INET), Kanazawa University, Kakuma-mati, Kanazawa 920-1192, Japan

Received date: 2014-09-17

  Revised date: 2014-11-20

  Online published: 2014-12-18


Implementing wildlife-friendly farming (WFF) practices is a sound approach to sustain ecological restoration of farmland. The aims of the study were to explore factors affecting farmers' implementation of WFF practices on Sado Island, Japan and to consider the policy implications of disseminating such practices. All 5010 farming households on Sado Island, who are distributing rice to Japan Agricultural Cooperatives (JA), were surveyed. In total, 2231 households responded to the questionnaire (response 44.5%). By comparing the attitudes, beliefs, and attributes of non-certified versus certified farmers, we identified key factors affecting farmers' implementation of WFF practices. Compared with non-certified farmers, certified farmers: (i) showed a greater interest in biodiversity and the financial benefits of WFF; (ii) had a larger number of certified farmer friends; (iii) felt many more pressures and expectations from consumers, in particular; and (iv) were not hampered by bad labor or farmland conditions when implementing WFF practices. To further disseminate WFF practices in Sado, we suggest that the information on the effectiveness of WFF on paddy field biodiversity is used in public education, and opportunities for interchanging opinions are set up between non-certified and certified farmers, as well as between farmers and consumers.

Cite this article

NAKAMURA Satoshi, TSUGE Takahiro, OKUBO Satoru, TAKEUCHI Kazuhiko, USIO Nisikawa . Exploring Factors Affecting Farmers' Implementation of Wildlife-friendly Farming on Sado Island, Japan[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2014 , 5(4) : 370 -380 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2014.04.013


Ajzen I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav. Hum. Decis. Process, 50:179-211.

Ajzen I, M Fishbein. 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Alston D G, M E Reding. 1998. Factors influencing adoption and educational outreach of integrated pest management. J. Extension., 36(3): 3FEA3.

Battershill M R, A W Glig. 1997. Socio-economic constraints and environmentally friendly farming in the Southwest of England. J. Rural. Stud., 13:213-228.

Beedell J, T Rehman. 2000. Using social-psychology models to understand farmers' conservation behaviour: The relationship of verbal and overt verbal responses to attitude objects. J. Rural. Stud., 16:117-127.

Brodt S, K Klonsky, L Tourte. 2006. Farmer goals and management styles: Implications for advancing biologically based agriculture. Agr. Syst., 89:90-105.

de Lauwere C, M van Asseldonk, J vant Riet, et al. 2012. Understanding farmers' decisions with regard to animal welfare: The case of changing to group housing for pregnant sows. Livestock Science, 143:151-161.

De Young R A, A Duncan, J Frank, et al. 1993. Promoting source reduction behavior: The role of motivational information. Environ. Behav., 25:70-85.

Fielding K S, D J Terry, B M Masser, et al. 2005. Explaining landholders' decisions about riparian zone management: The role of behavioural, normative, and control beliefs. J. Environ. Manag., 77:12-21.

Fujie T. 2003. Expanding the implementation of environmentally friendly farming. Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Review, 7:16-21 (in Japanese)

Fujioka M. 1998. Crisis in paddy fields warned by herons. In: Ezaki Y, Tanaka T (Ed.). Waterfront Environment Conservation—From the Perspective of Biocoenosis. Tokyo: Asakura Publishing Co., Ltd., 34-52. (in Japanese)

Greiner R, R Gregg. 2011. Farmers' intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy, 28: 257-265.

Hirose Y. 1995. Social psychology on the environment and consumption. Nagoya: University of Nagoya Press. (in Japanese)

Ide M. 1998. Biota conservation functions. In: Minami K (Ed.). Environmental conservation and agriculture and forestry. Tokyo: Asakura Publishing Co., Ltd., 107-118. (in Japanese)

Inaba M. 2005. Environmental creation-based organic rice farming using biodiversity and natural cyclical functions. Japanese Society of Organic Agriculture Science Annual Research Report Vol. 5, The Vision and Possibility of Organic Farming Methods, Commons, Tokyo, 136-152. (in Japanese)

Jacobson S K, K E Sieving, G A Jones, A Van Doorn. 2003. Assessment of farmer attitudes and behavioral intentions toward bird conservation on organic and conventional Florida farms. Conservat. Biol., 17:595-603.

Kurosawa M, Tezuka T. 2005. Awareness of farmers approaching the sustainable agriculture to improve regional environment: Case study of environmentally conscious agriculture in Shiga Prefecture. Journal of Rural Planning Association, 7:61-66. (in Japanese)

Mineta T, Kurita H, Ishida K. 2004. Potential of winter-flooded rice field in regard to farming and the multifunctionality: Analysis of status by questionnaire and interview survey to operative farmers. Journal of Rural Planning Association, 23:61-66. (in Japanese)

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). 2005. The FY2012 Annual Report on Food, Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan. The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. (in Japanese)

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan (MAFF). 2007. The MAFF Biodiversity Strategy. The Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan. (in Japanese)

Morris C, C Potter. 1995. Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers' adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK. J. Rural. Stud., 11:51-63.

Nakagawa S. 1998. Considering consolidation and improvement of paddy fields and biodiversity conservation. Res J Food Agr, 21:3-8. (in Japanese)

Nolan J M, P W Schultz, R B Cialdini, et al. 2008. Normative social influence is under detected. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 34:913-923.

Nonami H. 1996. The active minority promoting the diffusion of environment-conscious behavior: The effects on the cognitive processes of the inhabitants in a community. Journal of the Faculty of Literature, Nagoya University, Philosophy, 42:141-154. (in Japanese) Potter C, R Gasson. 1988. Farmer participation in voluntary land diversion schemes: Some predictions from a survey. J Rural Stud., 4:365-375.

Siebert R, M Toogood, A Knierim. 2006. Factors affecting European farmers' participation in biodiversity policies. Sociologia Ruralis, 46:318- 340.

Willock J, I J Deary, M M McGregor, et al. 1999. Farmers' attitudes, objectives, behaviors, and personality traits: The Edinburgh study of decision making on farms. J. Vocat. Behav. 54:5-36.

Wilson G. 1992. A survey on attitudes of landholders to native forest on farmland. J. Environ. Manag., 34:117-136.

Wilson G. 1996. Farmer environmental attitudes and ESA participation. GeoForum, 27:115-131.

Wilson G. 1997. Factors influencing farmer participation in the environmentally sensitive areas scheme. J. Environ. Manag., 50:67-93.