Biodiversity is one of the important aspects of Agricultural Heritage Systems and some consumers might be willing to pay a higher price for agricultural commodities that are produced in a way that conserves biodiversity. If so, whether can market-oriented policies to promote adding the value of biodiversity to agricultural products be used to conserve biodiversity? Our study focuses on consumer reactions to "life brand" product, which is labeled as "Stork-raising rice" in Toyooka City in Japan, produced environmentally-friendly agricultural practices for the revival of extinct stork. Using data of choice experiment and Latent Segment model, we analyzed whether these agricultural products can achieve higher market prices. The results showed that consumer, who had knowledge that stork populations had been revived because of changes in agricultural practice, are willing to buy expensive rice that improve biodiversity conservation for stork. However, consumers who bought this rice because of a preference for reduced-pesticide or organic food, without knowledge of revived stork history, were not willing to do so. The majority of agricultural product consumers in Japan are this type of consumer. Thus, the promotion of biodiversity conservation by only "life brand" agricultural products is not enough. Therefore, government support and public activities are indispensable for biodiversity conservation.
YABE Mitsuyasu, HAYASHI Takashi, NISHIMURA Bunei, SUN Binhong
. Conservation of Biodiversity and Its Value in Agricultural Products[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2014
, 5(4)
: 291
-300
.
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2014.04.002
Aizaki H. 2005. Choice experiment analysis of consumers' preference for ecologically friendly rice. Agricultural Information Research, 14(2): 85- 96.
Ben-Akiva M, J Walker, A T Bernardino, et al. 1997. Integration of choice and latent variable models. International Association of Travel Behavior
Research Conference (IATBR), Austin, Texas, 21-25 September 1997.
Ben-Akiva M, D McFadden, T Gärling, et al. 1999. Extended framework for modeling choice behavior. Marketing Letters, 10:187-203.
Boxall P C, W L Adamowicz. 2002. Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach.Environmental and Resource Economics, 23: 421-446.
Child D. 1990. The essentials of factor analysis. London: Cassell Educational Limited.
Fennell G, G A Allenby, Yang S, Y Edwards. 2003. The effectiveness of demographic and psychographic variables for explaining brand and product use. Quantitative Marketing and Economics, 1: 223-244.
Hanemann W M, B Kanninen. 1999. The statistical analysis of discreterespond CV data. In: Bateman I, K Willis (Eds.). Valuing the environment preferences: Theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EC and developing countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 302-441.
Japan Grassland Agriculture and Forage Seed Association. 2008.Multifunctionality of grassland management: Index of meadow. Tokyo: Japan Grassland Agriculture and Forage Seed Association. (in Japanese)
Kamakura W, G Russell. 1989. A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure. Journal of Marketing Research, 26: 379-390.
Kontoleon A, Yabe M. 2006. Market segmentation analysis of preferences for GM derived animal foods in the UK. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 4(1): 1-36.
Kuriyama K. 1998. Environmental value and valuation method. Hokkaido:Hokkaido University Press. (in Japanese)
Louviere J J, D A Hensher, J D Swait. 2000. Stated choice methods:Analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McFadden D. 1986. The choice theory approach to marketing research.Marketing Science, 5: 275-297.
McFadden D. 1999. Rationality for economists. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19: 73-105.
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF). 2007. Biodiversity strategy for agriculture, forestry and fisheries. Tokyo: MAFF. (in Japanese)
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF). 2010. Living things mark: Agricultural products guide book. Tokyo: MAFF. (in Japanese)
National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. 2010.Demographic material collection. Tokyo: National Institute of Population and Social Security Research. (in Japanese)
Swait J R. 1994. A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data.Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 1: 77-89.
Tanaka A, Hayashi T. 2010. Agricultural practices for biodiversity conservation and Life Mark Products. In: Policy Research Institute,Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (PRIMAFF) Research Project Report: Impact of Intensive Agricultural Production of Biodiversity. Tokyo: PRIMAFF, 1-17. (in Japanese)
Terawaki T. 1998. Evaluating the economic value of biodiversity conservation and agricultural features. Agricultural Economics, 31: 97- 122.
The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). 2008. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: An intermediate report. http:// www.teebweb.org/Home/tabid/924/Default.aspx
Yabe M, Hayashi T, Nishimura B. 2013. Economic analysis of consumer behaviour and agricultural products based on biodiversity conservation value. In: Pillarisetti J R (ed.). Multifunctional Agriculture, Ecology and Food Security: International Perspectives. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 21-37.
Yoshida K, H H Peterson. 2003. Estimating the consumer response toward the country-of-origin labeling and food safety of imported rice. Journal of Rural Economics, (Special Issue 2003): 297-302.
Wedel M, W Kamakura. 2000. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
