Recent Advances and Challenges in Ecosystem Service Research

  • 1 College of Resources and Environment, Henan University of Economics and Law, Zhengzhou 450046, China;
    2 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2013-09-04

  Revised date: 2014-02-18

  Online published: 2014-03-18

Supported by

National Social Science Fund of China (No. 12BJL046).


Despite its recency as a research area, ecosystem service research has developed over the last decade into a significant area of science. In this paper we review recent advances and challenges in ecosystem service research. Our review finds that (ⅰ) Ecosystem services are ubiquitous in biosphere. But they are treated differently among scientific communities. In order for the concept of ecosystem services to make a large and meaningful contribution to conservation and human well-being, it needs to be clearly defined and put into a framework so that it is both fit for a given research purpose and operational for management decisions. In addition, there is not one classification scheme for all purposes. Ecosystem services should be classified based upon both the characteristics of ecosystem services of interest and a context for which the concept of ecosystem services is being mobilized. (ⅱ) As sources of human well-being, ecosystem services have several key ecological and economic characteristics such as complexity, spatial scales, public-private goods aspect and benefit dependence. Understanding these characteristics is a prerequisite for measuring, modeling, valuing and managing ecosystem services. (ⅲ) Human demands for ecosystem services and the supply and use of them are three necessary linkages between ecosystems and human well-being. They are of great importance to such vital issues as ecological conservation and social equity. In most cases, integrated studies involving multi-disciplines, multi-sectors and multi-districts on those three linkages should be carried out to support sound ecosystem service management decisions. And (ⅳ) ecosystem services have multiple value attributes including utilitarian values and non-utilitarian values. In the processes of making decisions concerning the use of ecosystem services, all kinds of values are usually played out on a common and not always level playing field. They intersect and interact in various ways, and may complement or counter-balance each other in assisting decisions. A multi-criteria valuation system should be developed and used to estimate the value of ecosystem services.

Cite this article

ZHANG Yongmin, ZHAO Shidong, GUO Rongchao . Recent Advances and Challenges in Ecosystem Service Research[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2014 , 5(1) : 82 -90 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2014.01.010


Boyd J, S Banzhaf. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecological Economics, 63 (2-3): 616-626.

Boyd J. 2007. Nonmarket benefits of nature: What should be counted in green GDP? Ecological Economics, 63 (2-3): 716-723.

Chee Y E. 2004. An ecological perspective on the valuation of ecosystem services. Biological Conservation, 141: 350-352.

Costanza R, R d'Arge, R de Groot, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260.

Costanza R. 2000. Social goals and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecosystems, 3: 4-10.

Costanza R. 2008. Ecosystem services: Multiple classification systems are needed. Biological Conservation, 141: 350-352.

Daily G C. 1997. Nature's service: Societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington DC: Island Press.

Daily G, T Soderqist, S Aniyar. 2000. The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289: 395-396.

de Groot R S, M A Wilson, R M J Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41: 393-408.

Farber S C, R Costanza, M A Wilson. 2002. Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41 (2): 375-392.

Fisher B, R K Turner, P Morling. 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics, 68: 643-653.

Fisher B, R K Turner. 2008. Ecosystem services: Classification for valuation. Biological Conservation, 141: 1167-1169.

Goulder L H, D Kennedy. 2011. Interpreting and estimating the value of ecosystem services. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press.

Hein L, K van Koppen, R S de Groot, et al. 2006. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 57: 209-228.

Kremen C, R S Ostfeld. 2005. A call to ecologists: measuring, analyzing, and managing ecosystem services. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 3(10): 540-548.

Kroeger T, F Casey. 2007. An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecological Economics, 64 (2): 321-332.

Li W H, Zhang B, Xie G D. 2009. Research on ecosystem services in China: Progress and Perspectives. Journal of Natural Resources, 24 (1): 1-10. (in Chinese)

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2003. Ecosystems and human wellbeing: A framework for assessment. Washington DC: Island Press.

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC.

Norberg J. 1999. Linking nature's services to ecosystems: Some general ecological concepts. Ecological Economics, 29: 183-202.

Ouyang Z Y, Wang R S, Zhao J Z. 1999. Ecosystem services and their economic valuation. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 10(5): 635-640. (in Chinese)

Tallis H, S Polasky. 2011. Assessing multiple ecosystem services: An integrated tool for the real world. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford University Press.

Troy A, M A Wilson. 2006. Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecological Economics, 60: 435-449.

Turner R K, J Paavola, P Cooper, et al. 2003. Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46: 493-510.

Vihervaara P, M Rönkä, M Walls. 2010. Trends in ecosystem service research: Early steps and current drivers. AMBIO, 39: 314-324.

Wallace K J. 2007. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biological Conservation, 139: 235-246.

Xie G D, Lu C X, Leng Y F, et al. 2003. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. Journal of Natural Resources, 18 (2): 189-196. (in Chinese)

Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X, et al. 2008. Supply, consumption and valuation of ecosystem services in China. Resources Science, 30(1):93-99. (in Chinese)

Xie G D, Zhen L, Lu C X. et al. 2010. Applying value transfer method for eco-service valuation in China. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 1(1): 51-59.

Zhang B, Xie G D, Xiao Y, et al. 2010. Classification of ecosystem services based on human demand. China Population, Resources and Environment, 20(6):64-67. (in Chinese)

Zhao J, Yang K. 2007. Valuation of ecosystem services: Characteristics, issues and prospects. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 27(1):346-356. (in Chinese)

Zhen L, Liu X L, Wei Y J. 2008. Consumption of ecosystem services: Models, measurement and management framework. Resources Science, 30(1):100-106. (in Chinese)