Reports

Benefit-Sharing Mechanism of Hydropower Development:Nujiang Prefecture in Yunnan

Expand
  • 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2 Key Laboratory of Regional Sustainable Development Modeling, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    3 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    4 Shandong University of Technology, Shandong 255012, China

Received date: 2013-01-29

  Revised date: 2013-12-05

  Online published: 2013-12-20

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41271146);Key Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KZZD-EW-06-01).

Abstract

Southwestern China contains rich hydropower resources and a high concentration of impoverished people. The acceleration of hydropower development is an important way for promoting the development of impoverished areas and improving the livelihood assets of rural households. Taking Nujiang Prefecture as our focal area we conducted enterprise interviews and government discussions to arrive at a benefit-sharing mechanism for hydropower development. We found that heavy tax burdens on enterprises, low compensation standards, unreasonable electricity prices and weak development conditions are the main reasons that hydropower development is not accompanied by local economic development and improvement in the livelihoods of rural people. Based on a specific factor model and the theory of persistent income, a theoretical model is proposed and used to assess the scenario before relocation and the scenario after relocation. On this basis, policy recommendations for benefit-sharing mechanisms of hydropower development are proposed.

Cite this article

FAN Jie, HAN Zhenghai, SHENG Kerong, SUN Wei . Benefit-Sharing Mechanism of Hydropower Development:Nujiang Prefecture in Yunnan[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2013 , 4(4) : 361 -368 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2013.04.009

References

Cernea M M. 2000. Risks, safeguards and reconstruction: A model for population displacement and resettlement. In: Cernea M M and C McDowell (Eds.). Risks and Reconstruction: Experiences of Resettles and Refugees. Washington D.C.: The World Bank, 11-55.

Chamber R and G Conway. 1992. Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. Brighton, England: Institute of Development Studies, 35-60.

Chen G Y, Wu G S. 2005. Implementing long-term annual compensation, resolving the resettlement problems of reservoir area. Guizhou Water Power, 19(2): 11-14. (in Chinese)

DFID. 2000. Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. Department for International Development, 45-56.

Duan Y F, Zhou L Y. 2011. On long-term mechanism of resettlers' stable and prosperous development in Yichang in Post-TGP Period. China Three Gorges Tribune, 238(3): 39-43, 47. (in Chinese)

Duan Y F. 2004. A study on improving the benefit-sharing mechanism of water conservancy hydropower project. The Economist, 4: 46-47. (in Chinese)

Duan Y F. 2009a. Investment compensation and resettlement mode: Innovation, system innovation and application prospect. Hunan Social Sciences, 1: 64-67. (in Chinese)

Duan Y F. 2009b. Probe into the mechanism of reservoir residents' relocation and compensation. Chongqing Social Sciences, 176(7): 35-39. (in Chinese)

Feng Y. 2008. Paradox between the economic development and ecological protection in the hydropower development of Nujiang River of Yunnan Province and its declassification. The Journal of Anhui Agricaltural Sciences, 36(34): 15188-15189, 15249. (in Chinese)

Jia S H, Chen H H. 2002. Review of definition of stakeholds. Foreign Economies and Management, 5: 13-18. (in Chinese)

Klimpt J-E, C Rivero, H Puranen, et al. 2002. Recommendations for sustainable hydroelectric development. Energy Policy, 30(14): 1305-1312.

Knetsch J L. 1983. Property rights and compensation. Toronto, Butterworth and Co. (Canada) Ltd.

Kong L Q, Shi G Q, Li T H. 2008. The research on the rationales and mechanisms of immigrant sharing the economic benefit of hydroelectric project. Water Power, 34(1): 5-8. (in Chinese)

Mahoney S P, J A Schaefer. 2002. Hydroelectric development and the disruption of migration in caribou. Biological Conservation, 107(2): 147-153. Samuelson P. Olin was right. Swedish Journal of Economics, 1971, (73): 365-384.

Shang K, Shi G Q, Sheng J C. 2010. Economic analysis on rural immigration compensation and resettlement mode of hydropower development. Statistics and Decision, (17): 74-77. (in Chinese)

Shi G Q. 1996. Planning theory and application of reservoir resettlement. Nanjing: Hohai University Press. (in Chinese)

The research group of The State Taxation Bureau of Yunnan Province. 2007. Influences and countermeasures of value added tax policy on Yunnan's hydroelectricity industry. Taxation Research, 263(4): 68-70. (in Chinese)

Van Wicklin W A. 1999. Sharing project benefits to improve resettlers' livelihoods. In: Cernea M (Ed.). The Economics of Involuntary Resettlement: Challenges and Questions. Washington D. C.: The World Bank, 241-256.

Wang J H. 2005. Mechanism of the rural reservoir resettlement for shareholders with the land-use right. South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology, 1: 62-64. (in Chinese)

Yang M Q, OUYANG C Y, Luo H S. 2010. Hydropower resettlement problems and countermeasures in frontier minority poverty area: A case of Nujiang Prefecture in Yunnan Province. China Rural Water and Hydropower, (11): 155-156. (in Chinese)

Zhang Q, Pei L Y, Guan X. 2010. Resettlement mode of rural relocatees of Yunnan reservoir area of Xiluodu Hydropower Station. Yangtze River, 41(23): 59-62. (in Chinese)

Zhao X Y. 2008. Discussion on joint-stock immigration of water conservancy and hydropower engineering. Yangze River, 39(2): 83-85. (in Chinese)
Outlines

/