This paper illustrates the spatial variations in urban resource and environmental efficiency (REE) amongst 285 cities in China using a Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model, and examines the factors that have had the greatest effect on this spatial pattern by regression models. The results gave an average urban REE of 0.6381, and an average pure technical efficiency (PTE) and scale efficiency (SE) of 0.6964 and 0.9225, respectively. The results support the existence of a U-shaped relationship between REE and income level, which means that an increase in urban GDP does not result in an equivalent increase in environmental efficiency. Economic growth affects REE in three ways: scale effects (population scale and urbanization rate); composition effects; and spatial effects. Improvements in urban resource use and environmental efficiency depend upon both technological innovation and effective governance. Policies designed to achieve these improvements should therefore be implemented at all levels of government and local enterprise.
ZHANG Xiaoping, LI Yuanfang, WU Wenjia
. Evaluation of Urban Resource and Environmental Efficiency in China Based on the DEA Model[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2014
, 5(1)
: 11
-19
.
DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2014.01.002
Bian Y W, Yang F. 2010. Resource and environment efficiency analysis of province in China: A DEA approach based on Shannon's entropy. Energy Policy, 38(4): 1909-1917.
Banker R D. 1984. Estimating most productive scale size using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 17(1): 35-44.
Charnes A, W W Cooper, E L Rhodes. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6): 429-444.
Clark T A. 2013. Metropolitan density, energy efficiency and carbon emission: multi-attribute trade-offs and their policy implications. Energy Policy, 53: 413-428.
Cook W D, L M Seiford. 2009. Data envelopment analysis (DEA)-Thirty years on. European Journal of Operational Research, 192(1): 1-17.
Cui Q, Kuang H B, Wu C Y, Li Y. 2014. The changing trend and influencing factors of energy efficiency: The case of nine countries. Energy, 64: 1026-1034
Dinda S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: A survey. Ecological Economics, 49(4): 431-455.
Dyckhoff H, K Allen. 2001. Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2): 312-325.
Fang C L, Guan X L. 2011. Comprehensive measurement and spatial distinction of input-output efficiency of urban agglomerations in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(8): 1011-1022. (in Chinese)
Grossman G M, A B Krueger. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353-377.
Gu L X, Xiao J S. 2009. Economic efficiency of resource-based cities in China. Arid Land Geography, 32(4): 624-630. (in Chinese)
Guo T Y, He S J, Dong G P. 2011. Metropolitan resources efficiencies, change trends and causes in China under the goal to build an international metropolis. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 21(4): 746-756.
Halkos G E, N G Tzeremes. 2009. Exploring the existence of Kuznets curve in countries' environmental efficiency using DEA window analysis. Ecological Economics, 68(7): 2168-2176.
Jia Y P, Liu R Z. 2012. Study of the energy and environmental efficiency of the Chinese economy based on a DEA model. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 13: 2256-2263.
Ke J, Li C. 2005. Study on the coordinated development of regional resources, environment and economy in China based on DEA cluster analysis. China Soft Science, (2): 144-148. (in Chinese)
Krotscheck C, M Narodoslawsky. 1996. The sustainable process index, a new dimension in ecological evaluation. Ecological Engineering, 6(4): 241-258.
Li X, Xu X X, Chen H H. 2005. Temporal and spatial changes of urban efficiency in the 1990s. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(4): 615-625. (in Chinese)
Patterson M G. 1996. What is energy efficiency? Concepts, indicators and methodological issues. Energy policy, 24(5): 377-390.
Siche J R, F Agostinho, E Ortega, A Romeiro. 2008. Sustainability of nations by indices: Comparative study between environmental sustainability index, ecological footprint and the emergy performance indices. Ecological Economics, 66(4): 628-637.
Stern D I. 2012. Modeling international trends in energy efficiency. Energy Economics, 34(6): 2200-2208.
Sun W, Li Y, Wang D, et al. 2012. The efficiencies and their changes of China's resources-based cities employing DEA and Malmquist Index Models. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 22(3): 509-520.
Wang K, Yu S W, Zhang Wei. 2013. China's regional energy and environmental efficiency: A DEA window analysis based dynamic evaluation. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 58(5-6):1117-1127.
Wei Q L. 2000. Data envelopment analysis (DEA). Chinese Science Bulletin, 45(17): 1793-1808. (in Chinese)
Wu D W, Mao H Y, Zhang X L, et al. 2011. Assessment of urban land use efficiency in China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 66(8): 1111-1121. (in Chinese)
Wu Y Y, He X J. 2006. The evaluation of Beijing sustainable development based on DEA model. Systems Engineering – Theory Methodology and Applications, 26(3): 117-123. (in Chinese).
Yang K Z, Xie X. 2002. DEA efficiency of China city's input-output. Geography and Territorial Research, 18(3): 45-47.
Yang L, Wang K L. 2013. Regional differences of environmental efficiency of China's energy utilization and environmental regulation cost based on provincial panel data and DEA method. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 58(5-6): 1074-1083
Yu Y, Wen Z G. 2010. Evaluating China's urban environmental sustainability with Data Envelopment Analysis. Ecological Economics, 69(9): 1748-1755.
Zhang B, Bi J, Fan Z Y, et al. 2008. Eco-efficiency analysis of industrial system in China: A data envelopment analysis approach. Ecological Economics, 68(1): 306-316.
Zhou P, Ang B W. 2008. Linear programming models for measuring economy-wide energy efficiency performance. Energy Policy, 36 (8): 2911-2916.
