Articles

Tourism Ecological Security in Wuhan

Expand
  • 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
    3 College of Urban and Environmental Science, Huazhong Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China

Received date: 2012-09-04

  Revised date: 2013-05-24

  Online published: 2013-06-20

Abstract

The concept of ecological security stems from environmental security theory, and is generally used to evaluate the ecological security of land, water resources and the city. This study applies the Pressure-Station-Response (P-S-R) model and theory of ecological security with field research in 2010 to establish an index system for tourism ecological security evaluation. The findings show that tourism ecological security in Wuhan has increasingly improved from a comprehensive evaluation value of 5.8023 in 2004 to 6.459 in 2010, and has moved from a “sensitive” condition to “safe” condition. Ecological pressure and ecological response are negatively correlated, and the value of ecological response was below that of ecological pressure during the seven years. In order to make clear the impact factors affecting tourism ecological security in Wuhan, this paper summarizes ten limiting factors influencing tourism ecological security and makes several recommendations to improve tourism ecological security.

Cite this article

LI Yajuan, CHEN Tian, HU Jing, WANG Jing . Tourism Ecological Security in Wuhan[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2013 , 4(2) : 149 -156 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2013.02.007

References

Amy J L and N C Guy. 2001. Analysis of landscape patterns in coastal wetlands of Galveston Bay, Texas. Landscape Ecology, (16):581-595.

Cao X X, Chen T Z, Wang W H. 2006. Research on tourism ecological security—with the case of Kaifeng City. Soil and Water Conservation Research, 13(2): 209-212. (in Chinese)

Cao X X. 2006a. A study on ecological security alarm assessment of tourism destination—with the case of Kaifeng City. Environmental Science and Management, 31(3):39-43. (in Chinese)

Cao X X. 2006b. Research on tourism ecological security evaluation based on ecological footprint—with the case of Kaifeng City. China Human, Resource and Environment, 16(2):70-75. (in Chinese)

Dong X W. 2003. Tourism ecological security evaluation research—with the case of Wu Da Lian Chi scenic spot. Journal of Harbin Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 19 (6):100-105. (in Chinese)

Feng Y F, Jia T F. 2009. Ecological security-oriented pattern in the development of tourism and empirical research. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 23(6):181-186. (in Chinese)

Forman R T T and M Godron. 1986. Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley, 166.

Jia B Q, Wang C, Fu K B. 2010. Development potential analysis on ecological land in Wuhan City. Urban Environment & Urban Ecology, 23(5):10-13. (in Chinese)

Li H Q, Hou L C. 2010. Ecological footprint evaluation study in Wuhan City. Journal of Huazhong Normal University (Natural Science Edition), (2): 57-63. (in Chinese)

Li R N. 2010. Ecological security evaluation and optimization strategy of Yun Tai Mount tourism scenic spot. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science Edition), 9(1):71-75. (in Chinese)

Li X X, Zhang X. 2011. Land ecological security study in the process of urbanization based on entropy method. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 25(9): 13-17.(in Chinese)

Liu Y P. 2007. Analysis on ecological tourism and security. Forestry Economy, (6):54-57. (in Chinese)

Lv J. 2006. Research on ecological security of grasslands tourism development: with the case of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Shanghai: East China Normal University, May: 34-40. (in Chinese)

Peng J, Wu J S, Pan Y J, et al. 2012. Evaluation for Regional Ecological Sustainability Based on PSR Model: Conceptual framework. Progress in Geography, 31(7):933-940. (in Chinese)

Tong Y Q. 2007. Ecological security and ecological tourism scale. Ecological Protection, (5):33-36. (in Chinese)

Walz R. 2000. Development of environmental indicator system: Experiences from Germany. Environmental Management, 25(6): 613-623.

Wang C Y. 2010. TMDL plan of East Lake water pollution controlling in Wuhan City. The People Yangtze River, 41 (10):86-89. (in Chinese)

Yan L, Wang J K, Huang H. 2008. Ecological system health evaluation based on PSR pattern. Resources Science, 30(1): 107-113. (in Chinese)

Yang Q H, Zhang Z W. 2008. Research on economic loss estimation of soil erosion in Wuhan City. Water and Soil Conservation in China, (2):20-23. (in Chinese)

Zhao Q K. 2000. On basic concept concerning the development of tourism in the west of China. Tourism Tribune, (5):47-49. (in Chinese)

Zhang J H, Zhang J, Wang Q.2008. Measuring the ecological security of tourism destination: Methodology and a case study of Jiuzhaigou. Geography Research, (2):449-458. (in Chinese)
Outlines

/