Reports

The Temporal-Spatial Distribution of Light Intensity in Maize and Soybean Intercropping Systems

Expand
  • Key Laboratory of the Ministry of Education for Agro-Biodiversity and Pest Management, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China

Received date: 2012-02-20

  Revised date: 2012-05-21

  Online published: 2012-06-30

Supported by

this work was supported by the National Basic Research Program (2011CB100400).

Abstract

Intercropping can improve field microclimates, decrease the incidence of crop diseases, and increase crop yields, but the reasons for this remain unknown. Solar radiation is the most important environmental influence. To understand the mechanisms of intercropping we established an experiment consisting of three cropping patterns: a monocropping control (treatment A) and two intercropping treatments (B: two rows of maize and two rows of soybean intercropping; C: two rows of maize and four rows of soybean intercropping). Results show that compared to monocropping, intercropping increased the amount of light penetrating to inferior leaves in maize plants. Light intensity reaching maize plants at the heading stage in intercropping increased over two-fold at 30 cm above ground and 10-fold at 70 cm above ground, compared with monocropping. At the flowering to maturity stage, light intensity at 110, 160 and 210 cm above ground among maize plants was greatly increased in intercropping compared with monocropping, by some five-fold, two-fold and 12%, respectively. Moreover, light intensity declined more slowly at the measured heights in the intercropping system compared with monocropping. From the 7–18th leaf, light intensity per leaf increased two-fold in intercropping compared with monocropping. Daily light duration increased more than a mean of 5 h per day per leaf in intercropping compared with monocropping. The biological characters of maize including thousand kernel weight, yield per plant and area of ear leaves were all greater in intercropping than monocropping. These results suggest that, for maize, intercropping improves light density and duration significantly and this may contribute to biomass and yield increases.

Cite this article

HE Hanming, YANG Lei, ZHAO Lihua, WU Han, FAN Liming, XIE Yong, ZHU Youyong, LI Chengyun . The Temporal-Spatial Distribution of Light Intensity in Maize and Soybean Intercropping Systems[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012 , 3(2) : 169 -173 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.02.009

References

Awal M A, H Koshi, T Ikeda. 2006. Radiation interception and use bymaize/peanut intercrop canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,139:74-83.
Bedoussac L, E Justes. 2010. Dynamic analysis of competition andcomplementarity for light and N use to understand the yield and theprotein content of a durum wheat–winter pea intercrop. Plant and Soil,330(1-2):37-54.
Dasbak M A D, J E Asiegbu. 2009. Performance of pigeon pea genotypesintercropped with maize under humid tropical ultisol conditions. Journalof Animal & Plant Sciences, 4(2):329-340.
Hayder G, S S Mumtaz et al. 2003. Maize and soybean intercropping undervarious levels of soybean seed rates. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences,2(3):339-341.
Li C Y, He X H, et al. 2009. Crop Diversity for Yield Increase. PLoS ONE,4(11): e8049. doi:10.1371/journal. Pone.0008049
Monteith J L. 1977. Climate and the efficiency of crop production in Britain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, London, B 281: 277-294.
Natarajan M, R W Willey. 1980. Sorghum-pigeonpea intercropping andthe effects of plant population density. 2. Resource use. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 95:59-65
Shibles R M, C R Weber. 1966. Interception of solar radiation and drymatter production by various soybean planting patterns. Crop Science, 6:55-59.
Sivakumar M V K, S M Virmani. 1984. Crop productivity in relation tointerception of photosynthetically active radiation. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 31: 131-141.
Tsubo M, S Walker, E Mukhala. 2001. Comparisons of radiation useefficiency of mono-/intercropping with different row orientations. Field Crops Research, 71: 17-29.
Willey R W. 1990. Resource use in intercropping systems. Agricultural Water Management, 17:215-231.
Zhang L, W van der Werf, et al. 2008. Light interception and utilization inrelay intercrops of wheat and cotton. Field Crops Research, 107: 29-42.
Zhu Y Y, Chen H R, et al. 2000. Genetic diversity and disease control inrice. Nature, 406: 718-722.
Zhu Y Y, Li C Y, et al. 2007. Genetic diversity for crops diseases’sustainable management. Beijing: Science Press, 364-374. (in Chinese)
Outlines

/