Ecological Compensation and the Cost of Wildlife Conservation: Chang Tang Grasslands, Tibet

  • Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China

Received date: 2011-10-31

  Revised date: 2011-12-22

  Online published: 2012-03-30

Supported by

National Eleven Five-year Plan Science and Technology Program (2009BADC2B03).


The cost of ecological and environmental protection is a core part of ecological compensation standards and consists of direct costs, opportunity costs and development. This paper uses Naqu, a section of the Chang Tang Nature Reserve, Tibet as a case study to assess direct and opportunity costs of wildlife conservation to herdsmen. A standard sheep unit has been established for determining the animal carrying capacity of grasslands across China, and we used this to convert wild animals into standard sheep units. This approach links the grassland ecosystem, herbivorous wild animals and their valuation together. Our results show that the total cost of wildlife conservation reached 5.69 billion Chinese Yuan (CNY). The opportunity cost was 4.5 billion CNY, accounting for 79% and direct cost. The biggest economic loss to herdsmen was the opportunity cost in Chang Tang Nature Reserve and means that herdsmen have to give up economic income from livestock husbandry when grazing is banned. Opportunity cost assessment is integral to establishing ecological compensation. The average value of wildlife conservation was 1482 CNY per capita and 57 CNY per hectare according to population and the area of moderately and seriously degraded grassland. The period of ecological compensation should last five to ten years after grazing is banned.

Cite this article

LU Chunxia, XIE Gaodi, XIAO Yu . Ecological Compensation and the Cost of Wildlife Conservation: Chang Tang Grasslands, Tibet[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012 , 3(1) : 20 -25 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.01.004


Chen Q, Wei Y Z. 2007. Standard, scope and method of ecological compensation related with non-commercial forest. Science & Technology Review, 25(10):64-66. (in Chinese)
Conover M R and D J Decker. 1991. Wildlife damage to crops : Perception of agricultural and wildlife professionals in 1957 and 1987. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 19(1): 46-52.
Dawa Tsering. 2009. Grassland privatization and fencing project and its impacts on nature reserve and wildlife projection in the Chang Tang Regions of Tibet, China. Tibetan Studies, (3): 85-93. (in Chinese)
Gao Q Z, Li Y E, Lin E D, et al. 2005. Temporal and spatial distribution of grassland degradation in Northerm Tibet. Acta Geographica Sinica, 60(6): 965-973. (in Chinese)
Gao Z S and Ma J Z. 2004. Ecological value of wild deer and the influence factors. Journal of Economic Animal, 8(1):13-15. (in Chinese)
Han S and Liu J C. 2008. A methodological study on negative value evaluation on wildlife resources. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 23(4): 144-147. (in Chinese)
Han S. 2008. The study of application and estimation on wildlife resources value in China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree of Beijing Forestry University, 2008. (in Chinese)
Li W H and Liu M C. 2006. Several strategic thoughts on China’s ecocompensation mechanism. Resources Science, 16(1): 101-107. (in Chinese)
Liu W L. 2009. Tibetan antelope. Beijing: Chinese Forestry Press. (in Chinese)
Schaller G B. 2003. Wildlife of the Tibetan Steppe. Kang A D (Trans.).Shanghai: Huadong Normal University Press, 36-38. (in Chinese)
Tan Q C. 2009. Eco-compensation standard and mechanism. China Population, Resources and Environment, 19(6):1-6. (in Chinese)
Wang Z Q, Wang Z L, et al. 2006. Study on basic legal problems about mechanism of compensation for ecology. China Population, Resources and Environment, 16(1):101-107. (in Chinese)
Wu X H, Wang C S, Yi H S. 2004. Discussion on characteristics of Mesozoic petrolume system of Qiangtang basin in Tibet. Coal Geology & Exploration, 32(6):27-30. (in Chinese)
Xu Z G, Wang X Y, Zong G, Li K M. 2010. The conflict and strategy between wildlife protection and livestock production in Qiangtang Natural Reserve. Central South Forest Inventory and Planning, 29(1):33- 37. (in Chinese)
Zheng H X and Zhang L B. 2006. Research on the standardization of compensation for the service of ecosystem in river valley. Environmental Protection, (1): 42-46. (in Chinese)
Zhou D J, Sang Y H, Li H M, Wan B C. 2009. Research on standard for watershed ecological compensation —A case study of Guanting reservoir basin. Journal of Agricultural University of Heibei, 32(6):10-141. (in Chinese)