The Effects of Eco-Compensation in the Farming-Pastoral Transitional Zone of Inner Mongolia, China

  • 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2 Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2011-01-17

  Revised date: 2011-05-03

  Online published: 2011-06-28

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (40788001) and Key Research Project Supported by MOST (2006BAC08B06).


Ecological compensation or eco-compensation has been implemented mainly through institutional arrangement in China. In the farming-pastoral transitional zone of Inner Mongolia, eco-compensation has been implemented in two modes, one for land use abandonment and the other for productionstructure adjustment. Based on a detailed field survey, this study performs a comparative analysis of the willingness of households to accept economic compensation and consequently evaluates the effects of the two eco-compensation modes. The mode of eco-compensation for land use abandonment lacks a mechanism for generating employment opportunities and so is unsustainable. In contrast, ecocompensation for production-structure adjustment makes the pastoral and farming scales of households decrease significantly and most importantly helps to generate more job opportunities. Although this mode faces households with more market risk, it provides an effective means for resolving conflicts between ecosystems restoration and regional socio-economic development.

Cite this article

HAN Peng, HUANG Heqing, ZHEN Lin, LI Fen . The Effects of Eco-Compensation in the Farming-Pastoral Transitional Zone of Inner Mongolia, China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2011 , 2(2) : 141 -150 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-764x.2011.02.006


Barrow C J. 1991. Land Degradation: Development and Breakdown of Terrestrial Environments. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bayaer, Audenggaowa, Ma A, Zhou Y and Wang J. 2005. Inner Mongolia LUCC time and space process and driving mechanism in the historical times. Human Geography, 20(5): 122-127. (in Chinese)

Baylis K, S Peplow, G Rausser and L Simon. 2008. Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: A comparison. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 753-764.

Bennett M T. 2008. China’s sloping land conversion program: Institutional innovation or business as usual? Ecological Economics, 65(4): 699-711.

Bennett M T. 2009. Markets for Ecosystem Services in China: An Exploration of China’s “Eco-compensation” And Other Market-based Environment Policies. Washington. DC: Forest Trends. Website: (accessed 2010-07-07).

Cao X, Gu Z, Chen J, Liu J and Shui P. 2006. Analysis of human-induced steppe degradation based on remote sensing in Xilin Gole, Inner Mongolia, China. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 30(2): 268-377. (in Chinese)

Claassen R, A Cattaneo and R Johansson. 2008. Cost-effective design of agrienvironmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 737-752.

Corbera E, C G Soberanis and K Brown. 2009. Institutional dimensions of Payments for Ecosystem Services: An analysis of Mexico’s carbon forestry programme. Ecological Economics, 68(3): 743-761.

Fan Y, Shi P, Wang X and Pan Y. 2002. The analysis of typical dust storm in Northern China by remote sensing. Advances in Earth Science, 17(2): 289-294. (in Chinese)

Fan Y, Shi P, Zhou T and Li Y. 2007. The impact factor analysis of dust storm disaster in northern China. Advances in Earth Science, 22(4): 350-356. (in Chinese)

Gao Y. 2009. On the sustainable development of the northern grassland of China. in Lectures in Modern Ecology (iv) Theory and Apllications, eds YANG J and WU J, Beijing: Higher Education Press, 340-356. (in Chinese)

Gao S, Zhang C and Zou X, et al. 2008. Benefits of Beijing -Tianjin from Sand Source Control Engineering. Beijing: Science Press, 340-356. (in Chinese)

Gauvin C, E Uchida, S Rozelle, Xu J and Zhan J. 2009. Cost-effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services with dual goals of environment and poverty alleviation. Environmental Management, 45(3): 488-501.

Han P, Huang H, Zhen L, and Li F. 2010. A comparative analysis of the effects of two eco-compensation modes in the farming-pastoral zone of the Inner Mongolia. Resources Science, 32(5): 838-848.

Jeanneret P, B Schüpbach, L Pfiffner, F Herzog and T Walter. 2003. The Swiss agri-environmental programme and its effects on selected biodiversity indicators. Journal for Nature Conservation, 1(3): 213-220.

Ke S. 2007. A Theoretical and Empirical Study on Farming Household’s Behavior in Participating in the Grain for Green Project. Beijing: China Agriculture Press. (in Chinese)

Li F, Chen H and Li W. 2007. Socioeconomic impact of forest ecocompensation mechanism in Hainan Province of China. China Population, Resources and Environment, 17(6): 113-118.

Li F, Zhen L, Huang H, Han P, Liu X, et al. 2009. Impacts of land use functional change on WTA and economic compensation for core stakeholders: A case study in Poyang Lake. Resources Science, 31(4): 580-589. (in Chinese)

Liu G. 2003. Analysis on dynamics in grassland of Xilinguole based on technology of remote sensing, geographical information and global position system. PhD Thesis, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Huhhot.

Liu J, Yue T, Ju H, Wang Q and Li X. 2005. Integrated Ecosystem Assessment of Western China. Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Research Institute of Forest Resource Information Techniques, CAF, Information Center, SEPA, et al.

Liu X J. 2002. Thought on Xilinguole League’s implementation of “Enclosed and Transferring” Strategy. Forestry Economics, (4): 49-50. (in Chinese)

Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2007. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Washington DC: Island Publisher.

Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. 2008a. National Planning Outline for Protecting Ecologically Fragile Zones. (in Chinese)

Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China and Chinese Academy of Sciences. 2008b. National Ecological Function Zoning. (in Chinese)

Pagiola S, A R Rios and A Arcenas. 2008. Can the poor participate in payments for environmental services? Lessons from the Silvopastoral Project in Nicaragua. Environment and Development Economics, 13(03): 299-325.

Petheram L and B M Campbell. 2010. Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(5): 1139-1149.

PRC. State Council. 2000. State Council Opinions Regarding Further Improve Grain for Green Pilot work. (in Chinese)

PRC. State Council. 2002a. Grain for Grain Regulation. (in Chinese)

PRC. State Council. 2002b. State Council Opinions Regarding Further Perfect Grain for Green Policy Implement. (in Chinese)

PRC. State Council. 2007. State Council Note Regarding Perfect Grain for Green Policy. (in Chinese)

Task Force on Eco-Compensation Mechanisms and Policies, CCICED. 2007. Eco-Compensation Mechanisms and Policies in China. Beijing: Science Press.

Uchida E, Xu J T, Xu Z G and S Rozelle. 2007. Are the poor benefiting from China’s land conservation program? Environment and Development Economics, 12(4): 593-620.

Uchida E, S Rozelle and Xu J T. 2009. Conservation payments, liquidity constraints, and off-farm labor: impact of the grain-for-green program on rural households in China. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(1): 70-86.

Wang G. 2007. Analysis on the main factors of grassland degradation. Review of Economic Research, (44): 40-48. (in Chinese)

Wang Q, Huang H, Zheng L, Zhen L, Jiang L et al. 2010. Effects of the economic behaviors of farmers on the vulnerability of agricultural production system in the Poyang lake region—a study based on farmer surveys. Journal of Natural Resources, 25(3): 511-521. (in Chinese)

Wunder S. 2007. The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology, 21(1): 48-58.

Yang M. 2007. The Continuation of the Grain for Green Project - Farming Household’s Self-development and the Support from the Government. Chengdu: Bashu Book, (in Chinese)

Zhang L. 2006. Exploration of ecological pitfalls embeded in the human-land interaction. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 26(7): 2167-2173. (in Chinese)

Zhao Y and Liu Y. 1999. The decision of the region of fragile environment in China and the study on the relationship between fragile environment and poverty. Advances in Earth Science, 11(3): 245-251. (in Chinese)

Zhi L, Li N, Wang J and Kong F. 2004. A discussion on the economic compensation system for conversion of cropland to forestland in the Western China. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 40(2): 2-8. (in Chinese)

Zhou H, Wang Y and Yu X et al. 2002. Wetland Restoration and Sustainable Development in the Middle Reach of Yangtze River. Beijing: Economic Science Press. (in Chinese)