Reports

Rationality and Sensitivity of Resource Inputs on Outputs in Chaohu City

Expand
  • School of Geographic and Oceanographic Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China

Received date: 2012-12-10

  Revised date: 2013-04-12

  Online published: 2013-06-20

Supported by

National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41271467 and No. 40930103).

Abstract

Here, we estimate the rationality of specific agricultural inputs and discuss the sensitivity of integrated agricultural output to various resources input for Chaohu City, China. We used two parameters, marginal output and elastic coefficient, and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method, which has an unambiguous geometric meaning and is simple and convenient, to integrate various output and input. The results indicate that for most of 2001-2009, agricultural inputs rose except that the number of people engaged in agricultural production fell. Although integrated agriculture output increased, the proportion of resources with a negative utilization efficiency was 23.82% from 2001 to 2009. Integrated output was more sensitive to agricultural pesticide, the irrigation ratio and the use of plastic film. Integrated outputs may be increased by moderate decreases in input. This type of agricultural production meets the requirements of resource saving and is a sustainable mode of resource utilization.

Cite this article

ZHANG Yan, GAO Xiang, ZHANG Hong . Rationality and Sensitivity of Resource Inputs on Outputs in Chaohu City[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2013 , 4(2) : 179 -185 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2013.02.011

References

Caves D W, L R Christensen, W E Diewert. 1982. The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica, 50:1393-1414.

Chen Z, Song S F. 2008. Efficiency and technology gap in China’s agriculture: A regional meta-frontier analysis. China Economic Review, 19:287-296.

Cooper W W, Huang Z M, Li S X. 1996. Satisfying DEA models under chance constraints. Annals of Operational Research, 66:279-295.

Cooper W W, K S Park, Yu G. 1999. DEA and AR-IDEA: Models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Management Science, 45:597-607.

Cooper W W, L M Seiford, K Tone, Zhu J. 2007. Some models and measures for evaluating performances with DEA: Past accomplishments and future prospects. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 28:151-163.

Hua B, M McAleer. 2005. Estimation of Chinese agricultural production efficiencies with panel data. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 68:475-483.

Hwang C L, Yoon K. 1981. Multiple attribute decision making: Method and application. New York, NY: Spring-verlag Press.

Islam M R, S C Garcia. 2012. Rates and timing of nitrogen fertilizer application on yield, nutritive value and nutrient-use efficiency of early- and late-sown forage maize. Grass Forage Science, 67:24-33.

Jin J Y. 2012. Changes in the efficiency of fertiliser use in China. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 92:1006-1009.

Moreira V H, B E Bravo-Ureta. 2010. Technical efficiency and metatechnology ratios for dairy farms in three southern cone countries: A stochastic metafrontier model. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 33:33-45.

Mousavi-Avval S H, S Rafiee, A Jafari, et al. 2011. Improving energy productivity of sunflower production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 91:1885-1892.

Ncube B, S J Twomlow, J P Dimes, et al. 2009. Resource flows, crops and soil fertility management in smallholder farming systems in semi-arid Zimbabwe. Soil Use Management, 25:78-90.

Ogundari K, T T Amos, Okoruwa V O. 2012. A review of Nigerian agricultural efficiency literature, 1999-2011: What does one learn from frontier studies? African Development Review, 24:93-106.

SBA (Statistical Bureau of Anhui). 2001-2010. Anhui statistical yearbook 2001-2010. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

Si W, Wang X Q. 2011. Productivity growth, technical efficiency, and technical change in China’s soybean production. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 5606-5613.

Ugiati S, H T Odum, S Basfianoni. 1994. Energy use, environmental loading and sustainability: An energy analysis of Italy. Ecological Modeling, 73: 215-268.

Yao S J, Liu Z N. 1998. Determinants of grain production and technical efficiency in China. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49:171-184.

Yoon K. 1980. Systems selection by multiple attributes decision making. Manhattan, Kansas: Kansas State University.

Zhang Y J, B Brummer. 2011. Productivity change and the effects of policy reform in China’s agriculture since 1979. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature, 25: 131-150.
Outlines

/