Ecological Footprint and Endogenous Economic Growth in the Poyang Lake Area in China Based on Empirical Analysis of Panel Data Model

  • 1 School of Economics and Management, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;
    2 Systems Engineering Research Institute, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China;
    3 School of Economics and Management, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang 330013, China

Received date: 2012-09-24

  Revised date: 2012-11-30

  Online published: 2012-12-29

Supported by

the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.71063015 and No.71263039); Jiangxi Province’s Social Sciences “11th Five-Year Plan” project (No.10YJ61); and Science and Technology Project of the Education Department of Jiangxi Province (No.GJJ11271).


In this paper, ecological footprint methods were used to calculate the ecological footprint of six cities (Nanchang, Jingdezhen, Jiujiang, Xinyu, Yingtan and Fuzhou) in the Poyang Lake Area, Jiangxi, China from 1991 to 2010. Ecological footprint was the input factor for ecological resources and the contribution of this and other factors such as labor and capital to economic growth were analyzed. The results showed that, from 1991 to 2010, ecological footprints in the six cities increased year by year. The amount of land for fossil energy, under cultivation and grassland influenced total ecological footprint in each city. The contribution of ecological resources, labor factors and capital factors to economic growth showed regional differences. Nanchang, Jiujiang, Xinyu, and Yingtan are capital-orientated and capital factor had a great influence on the economic growth rates, whereas, Jingdezhen and Fuzhou were labor-orientated. The contribution of ecological resources to economic growth in the six cities was the lowest of all three factors, meaning that efficiency of ecological resource utilization is low. Total productivity plays a key role in economic development; however, the overall level of total factor productivity for the six cities was low and indicates that the technological content of Poyang Lake Area’s economic growth is low and the utilization of input factors extensive. In summary, we suggest changing the mode of economic growth and developing tertiary industry in the region.

Cite this article

HE Yiqing, CHE Ting, WANG Yun . Ecological Footprint and Endogenous Economic Growth in the Poyang Lake Area in China Based on Empirical Analysis of Panel Data Model[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012 , 3(4) : 367 -372 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.04.010


Cai W Y, Chen X S. 2010. International knowledge spillovers and technology progress in China. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 6:57-71. (in Chinese)

Fu C, Chen W, Ou Y Y. 2011. Footprint and economic and industrial development around the Poyang Lake. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 20(12):1525-1531. (in Chinese)

Gossling S, C B Hansson, O Horstmeier, et al. 2002. Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability. Ecological Economics,43:199-211.

Huang J. 2010. Environmental pollution and endogenous growth: Model and evidence from China. Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, 32(6):15-21. (in Chinese)

Jia J S, Xie D M, Zhen B F, Deng H B. 2008. Spatiotempral comparative analysis of ecological footprint of Poyang Lake Area and Five River Watersheds in Jiangxi province. Journal of Anhui Agriculture, 36(35):15612-15614,15636. (in Chinese)

Jiao W J, Min Q W, Cheng S K, Zhang D and Sun Y H. 2011. The energybased ecological footprint (EEF) of traditional agricultural areas in hina: A case study of Congjiang County, Guizhou Province. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2(1):56-65.

Li Z C, Wang G C, Guan X J. 2008. Co-intergration analysis and an error correction model for ecological footprint and economy growth in China.Resources Science, 30(2):261-266. (in Chinese)

Lammers A, R Moles, C Walsh, M A J Huijbregts. 2008. Ireland’s footprint: A time series for 1983-2001. Land Use Police, 25:53-58

Medved S. 2006. Present and future ecological footprint of Slovenia: The influence of energy demand scenarios. Ecological Modeling, 192:25-36.

Rees W. 1992. Ecological footprint and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment Urban, 4:121-130.

Senbel M, T McDaniels, H Dowlatabadi. 2003. The ecological footprint: a non-monetary metric of human consumption applied to North America.Global Environmental Change, 13:83-100.

van Vuuren D P and L F Bouwman. 2005. Exploring past and future changes in the ecological footprint for world regions. Ecological Economics,52:43-62.

Wackernagel M, C Monfreda, K H Erb, H Haberl, N B Schulz. 2004.Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961-1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach. Land Use Policy, 21:261-296.

Wackernagel M, W Rees. 1996. Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Philadelphia, PA: New Society Publishers.

Xu Z M, Zhang Z Q, Cheng G D. 2000. The calculation and analysis of ecological footprint of Gansu Province. Acta Geographical Science, 55(5):607-616. (in Chinese)

Zhang L F, Jia W P, Liu Y C. 2010. Relation between the ecological footprint and the economic growth of Hunan Bohai Sea economic region: An empirical analysis based on the panel data model. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 24(10):1-7. (in Chinese)

Zhang X T. 2007. A guide to using Eviews. Beijing: China Machine Press. (in Chinese)