Reports

Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Instantaneous Peak Flow Estimation for Kharestan Watershed, Iran

Expand
  • Neyriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, P. O. Box: 74915-311, Neyriz, Iran

Received date: 2012-10-17

  Revised date: 2012-11-12

  Online published: 2012-12-29

Abstract

Understanding the amount of instantaneous peak flow in watersheds is one of the most important factors that plays important role in planning and designing of projects related to water and river engineering. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficiency of artificial neural network and empirical methods for estimating instantaneous peak flow in Kharestan Watershed located northwest of Fars Province, Iran. For this purpose, 25 years of daily peak and instantaneous peak flow of Jamal Beig Hydrometric Station was considered. Then the estimation was done based on empirical methods including Fuller, Sangal and Fill-Steiner and artificial neural network and were compared based on RMSE and R2. Results showed that estimation of artificial neural network is more accurate than empirical methods with RMSE = 13.710 and R2 = 0.942 which indicated the lower errors of artificial neural network method compared with empirical methods.

Cite this article

Mohammad SHABANI, Narjes SHABANI . Application of Artificial Neural Networks in Instantaneous Peak Flow Estimation for Kharestan Watershed, Iran[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012 , 3(4) : 379 -383 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.04.012

References

Ahmad S, S Simonovic. 2005. An artificial neural network model for generating hydrograph from hydro–meteorological parameters. Journal of Hydrology, 315: 236-251.

Brooks K N, P F Ffolliott, H M Gregersen, et al. 2003. Hydrology and the management of watersheds. Nwe York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Dawson C W, R L Wilby. 1999. A comparison of artificial neural networks used for river flow forecasting. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 3:529-540.

Demirel M C, A Venancio, E Kahya. 2009. Flow forecast by SWAT model and ANN in Pracana basin, Portugal. Advances in Engineering Software, 40: 467-473.

Fill H D, A A Steiner. 2003. Estimating instantaneous peak flow from mean daily flow data. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 8(6): 365-369.

Fuller W E. 1914. Flood flow. Transaction of American Society of Civil Engineers, 77: 564-617.

Hassanpour Kashani M, Montaseri M, Lotfollahi M A. 2007. Flood estimation at ungauged sites using a new nonlinear regression model and artificial neural networks. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 2: 784-791.

Imrie C E, S Durucan, A Korre. 2000. River flow prediction using artificial neural networks: generalization beyond the calibration range. Journal of Hydrology, 233: 138-153.

Jain A, A M Kumar. 2007. Hybrid neural network models for hydrologic time series forecasting. Applied Soft Computing, 7: 585-592.

Joorabchi A, Zhang H, M Blumenstein. 2007. Application of artificial neural networks in flow discharge prediction for the Fitzroy River. Journal of Coastal Research, 50: 287-291.

Jothiprakash V, V Garg. 2009. Reservoir sedimentation estimation using artificial neural network. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14: 1035-1040.

Ki s i O. 2008. The potent ial of di fferent ANN techniques i nevapotranspiration modeling. Hydrological Processes, 22: 2449-2460.

Kumar M, N S Raghuwanshi, R Singh. 2011. Artificial neural networks approach in evapotranspiration modeling: a review. Irrigation Science,11-25.

Maier H R, Dandy G C. 2000. Neural networks for the prediction and forecasting of water resources variables: A review of modelling issues and applications. Environmental Modelling and Software, 15: 101-124.

Mohan Raju M, Srivastava R K, Bisht D C S, et al. 2011. Development of artificial neural network-based models for the simulation of spring discharge. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2011: 1-11.

Mustafa M R, Isa M H, Rezaur R B. 2012. Artificial neural networks modeling in water resources engineering: Infrastructure and Applications. International Journal of Social and Human Sciences, 62: 341-349.

Sahoo G B, Ray C, De Carlo E H. 2006. Use of neural network to predict flash flood and attendant water qualities of a mountainous stream on Oahu, Hawaii. Journal of Hydrology, 327: 525-538.

Sangal B P. 1983. Practical method of estimating peak flow. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 109(4): 549-563.

Shadmani M, Marofi S, Mohammadi K, et al. 2011. Regional flood discharge modeling in Hamedan Province using Artificial Neural Network. Journal of Water and Soil Conservation, 18: 21-42. (In Persian)

Smith J, R N Eli. 1995. Neural network models of rainfall-runoff process. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 121: 499-508.

Sudheer K P, Nayak P C, Ramasastri K S. 2003. Improving peak flow estimates in artificial neural network river flow models. Hydrological Processes, 17: 677–686.

Teschl R, Randeu W L. 2006. A neural network model for short term river flow prediction. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 6: 629–635.

Topaloulu F. 2002. Estimation of instantaneous peak flows in Seyhan River Basin using regional regression procedures. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 26: 47-55.

Viviroli D, M Zappa, J Schwanbeck, et al. 2009. Continuous simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of Switzerland – Part I: Modelling framework and calibration results. Journal of Hydrology, 377: 191–207.

Wu C L, Chau K W. 2011. Rainfall–runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. Journal of Hydrology, 399: 394-409.
Outlines

/