Articles

The Effects of Public Green Spaces on Residential Property Value in Beijing

Expand
  • 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2 Institute of Recycling Economy, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China

Received date: 2012-04-12

  Revised date: 2012-05-18

  Online published: 2012-09-27

Supported by

this research is funded by the Beijing Municipal Bureau of Landscape and Forestry and Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (No.2009CB421106).

Abstract

A number of empirical studies in Euro-American region consistently demonstrate that, parks and open space have a positive impact on property values.However, this effect has not been investigated in Beijing, China.And the public and city managers often ignore or underestimate the role of urban green spaces.This paper surveyed the relationship between the average house prices of 76 residential areas and 14 parks in Beijing, and measured the total benefits of 18 070 ha public green spaces on residential property value, by using the inventory data of urban green spaces (2009) and GIS techniques.Results showed that the residential property values located 850-1604 meters away from parks achieved a 0.5% to 14.1% increase in sales price.The overall benefit of Beijing's public green spaces on residential property was 2.86 billion CNY (1 USD=6.83 CNY), and the average benefit of per hectare public green space was 0.16 million CNY, corresponding to 1.8-3.9 times of the maintenance cost of green space in Beijing.Therefore, there is chance for local governments to increase property tax revenues due to the creation and maintenance of urban green spaces.

Cite this article

ZHANG Biao, XIE Gaodi, XIA Bin, ZHANG Canqiang . The Effects of Public Green Spaces on Residential Property Value in Beijing[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012 , 3(3) : 243 -252 . DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2012.03.007

References

Anderson L M and H K Cordell. 1988. Influence of trees on residential property values in Athens, Georgia (U. S. A. ):A survey based on actual sales prices. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15:153-164.

Anderson S T. 2000. The effect of open space on single family, residential home property values. Macalester Journal of Economics, 10:261-270.

Beijing Municipal Statistics Bureau. Beijing Statistical Yearbook 2010. Beijing:China Statistical Press, 2010. (in Chinese )

Bolitzer B and N Netusil. 2000. The impact of open space on property values in Portland, Oregon. Journal of Environmental Management, 59:185-193.

Bolund P and S Hunhammar. 1999. Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29:293-301.

Chen W Y and C Y Jim. 2008. Cost-benefit analysis of the leisure value of urban greening in the new Chinese city of Zhuhai. Cities, 25:298-309.

Correll M R, J H Lillydahl and L D Singell. 1978. The effects of greenbelts on residential property values:some findings on the political economy of open space. Land Economics, 2:207-21.

Crompton J L. 2001. The impact of parks on property values:a review of the empirical evidence. Journal of Leisure Research, 33(1):1-31.

Crompton J L. 2005. The impact of parks on property values:empirical evidence from the past two decades in the United States. Managing Leisure, 10:203-218.

Des Rosiers F, A Nolduc and M Th閞iault. 1999. Environment and value:Does drinking water quality affect house prices? Journal of Property Investment and Finance, 17(5):444-463.

Des Rosiers F, M Theriault, Y Kestens, et al. 2002. Landscaping and house values:an empirical investigation. Journal of Real Estate Research,23(1/2):139-161.

Dombrow J, M Rodriguez and C F Sirmans. 2000. The market value of mature trees in single-family housing markets. Appraisal Journal, 68(1):39-43.

Dunse N A, M White, C Dehring. 2007. Urban parks, open space and residential property values. London, United Kingdom:RICS. Espey M and K Owusu-Edusei. 2001. Neighborhood parks and residential poperty values in Greenville, South Carolina. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 33(3):487-492.

Fox T. 1990. Urban open space:an investment that pays. New York. The Neighborhood Open Space Coalition. Freeman A M. 1979. Hedonic prices, property values and measuring environmental benefits:a survey of the issues. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 81:154-171.

Gao X L, Asami Y. 2007. Effect of urban landscape on land prices in two Japanese cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81:155-166.

GLA (Greater London Authority). 2003. Valuing greenness:Green spaces, house prices and Londoners' priorities. London:Greater London Authority.

Henry M S. 1994. The contribution of landscaping to the price of single family houses:a study of home sales in Greenville, South Carolina. Journal of Environmental Horticulture, 12(2):65-70.

Hui E C M, Chau C K, Pun L L, et al. 2007. Measuring the neighboring and environmental effects on residential property value:using spatial weighting matrix. Building and Environment, 42:2333-2343.

Irwin E. 2002. The effects of open space on residential property values. Land Economics, 78(4), 465-480.

Jensen M B, B Persson, S Guldager, H Reeh, K Nilsson. 2000. Green structure and sustainability:developing a tool for local planning.

Landscape and Urban Planning, 52:117-133.

Jim C Y, Chen W Y. 2010. External effects of neighbourhood parks and landscape elements on high-rise residential value. Land Use Policy, 27:662-670.

Kong F H, Yin H W, Nakagoshi N. 2007. Using GIS and landscape metrics in the hedonic price modeling of the amenity value of urban green space:A case study in Jinan City, China. Landscape and Urban Planning, 79:240-252.

Laverne R J and K Winson-Geideman. 2003. The influence of trees and landscaping on rental rates at office buildings. Journal of Arboriculture,29:281-290.

Li L H, Zheng X Q, Xiang W N. 2008. A study on site coverage spatial distribution pattern of Beijing city Based on GIS. China Population, Resources and Environment, 18(1):122-127. (in Chinese )

Li F, Wang R S. 2003. Evaluation, planning and prediction of ecosystem services of urban green space:a case study of Yangzhou City. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23(9):1929-1936. (in Chinese )

Luttik J. 2000. The value of trees, water and open space as reflected by house prices in the Netherlands. Landscape and Urban Planning, 48:161-167.

Lutzenhiser M and N Netusil. 2001. The effect of open space on a home's sale price. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19(3):291-298.

Martin C W, R C Maggio and D N Appel. 1989. The contributory value of trees to residential property in the Austin, Texas metropolitan area. Journal of Arboriculture, 15(3):72-75.

Morales D, B N Boyce and R J Favretti. 1976. The contribution of trees to residential property value:Manchester, Connecticut. Valuation, 23(2):26-43.

Morales D J. 1980. The contribution of trees to residential property value. Journal of Arboriculture, 6(11):305-308.

More T A, T Stevens, G Allen. 1982. The economics of urban parks:a benefit-cost analysis. Parks and Recreation, 17:31-33.

More T A, T Stevens, G Allen. 1988. Valuation of urban parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 15:139-152.

Morales D J, F R Micha and R L Weber. 1983. Two methods of valuating trees on residential sites. Journal of Arboriculture, 9:21-24.

Moorhouse J C, M S Smith. 1995. The market for residential architecture:19th century row houses in Boston's South End. Journal of Urban Economics, 35(3):267-277.

Netusil N R, E Boyd, Z Van Griffen, M LaMerrill, E Rainsberger. 2000. Can open space be self-financing ? Food, Farm & Resource Issues, 15(2):21-23.

Nicholls S, J L Crompton. 2005. The impact of greenways on property values:evidence from Austin, Texas. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(3):321-341.

Quang D A and G Grudnitski. 1995. Golf courses and residential house price:an empirical examination. Journal of Real Estate and Finance Economics, 10:261-270.

Payne B R. 1973. The twenty-nine tree home improvement plan. Natural History, 82:74-75.

Shi Y S and Zhang R. 2010. Temporal-spatial impact effects of large-scale parks on residential prices:exemplified by the Huangxing Park in Shanghai. Geographical Research, 29(3):510-520. (in Chinese )

Theriaut M, Y Kestens and F Des Rosiers. 2002. The impact of mature trees on house values and on residential location choices in Quebec City. In:Rizzoli A E and A J Jakeman (eds. ). Integrated Assessment and Decision Support, Proceedings of First Biennial Meeting of the International Environmental Modeling and Software Society, Volume 2, 478-483.

Tyrvainen L. 1997. The amenity value of the urban forest:an application of the hedonic pricing method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 37:211-222.

Tyrvainen L and A Miettinen. 2000. Property prices and urban forest amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39:

205-223.

Wachter S M and K C Gillen. 2006. Public investment strategies:how they matter for neighborhoods in Philadelphia. Working Paper. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.

Weicher J C and R H Zerbst. 1973. The externalities of neighborhood parks:an empirical investigation. Land Economics, 49:99-105.

Yin H W, Xu J G, Kong F H. 2009. Impact of the Amenity Value of Urban Green Space on the Price of House in Shanghai. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(8):4492-4500. (in Chinese )

Zhang B, Xie G D, Xue K, et al. 2011. Evaluation of rainwater runoff storage by urban green spaces in Beijing. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 31(13):3839-3845. (in Chinese )

Zhong H Y, Zhang A L, Cai Y Y. 2009. Impacts of the Nanhu Lake in Wuhan City on the Price of Peripheral Houses:Empirical Research Based on Hedonic Model. China Land Science, 12:63-68. (in Chinese )
Outlines

/