The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Spatial Pattern of Environmental-Economy in China: Evidence from a Panel Cointegration Test

  • 1 Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100101, China;
    2 Graduate University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China

Received date: 2010-01-05

  Revised date: 2010-06-12

  Online published: 2010-06-30


This paper applies the panel unit root, heterogeneous panel cointegration test and panel-based dynamic OLS recently developed to re-investigate the Environmental Kuznets Curves for 30 provinces in mainland China from 1985 to 2007. The empirical results show that there is a positive long-term cointegrated relationship between economic growth and three types of environmental pollution. The relationships take on inverted U-shaped EKCs, but the turning points in these curves differ from those found in previous studies. We then analyze the spatial pattern of environmental-economy in China based on the estimations of this study. Most provinces in central and western China are not above the turning points of the EKCs, where industrial pollution emissions show an increasing trend. At present, China is subject to tremendous environmental pressures, and will need to meet enormous cost for pollution emissions reduction. However, environmental economic policies should differ over time and region.

Cite this article

DONG Suo-Cheng, Li-Fei, Li-Ze-Hong, Jin-Xian-Feng . The Environmental Kuznets Curve and Spatial Pattern of Environmental-Economy in China: Evidence from a Panel Cointegration Test[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2010 , 1(2) : 169 -176 . DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-764x.2010.02.009


Chen H W, Liu K B. 2004. Economic growth and environmental quality: an empirical analysis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Fudan Journal (Social Sciences Edition), 69(2): 87–94. (in Chinese)

Choi I. 2001. Unit root tests for panel data. Journal of International Money and Finance, 20: 249–272.

De Bruyn S M, J van den Bergh and J B Opschoor. 1998. Economic growth and emissions: reconsidering the empirical basis of environmental kuznets curves. Ecological Economics, 25(2): 161–175.

Dinda S. 2004. Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecological Economics, 49: 431–455.

Magnani E. 2001. The Environmental Kuznets Curve: development path or policy result. Environmental Modeling & Software, 16(2): 157–165.

Grossman G, et al. 1995. Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2): 353–377.

Grossman G, A B Krueger. 1991. Environmental impact of North American Free Trade Agreement. NBER Working Paper.

Harris R D, Tzavalis E. 1999. Inference for unit roots in dynamic panels where the time dimension is fixed. Journal of Econometrics, 91 (2): 201–226.

Im K S, M H Pesaran, Y Shin. 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 109: 53–74.

Roca J, E Padilla, M Farre, V Galletto. 2001. Economic growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: discussing the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis. Ecological Economics, 39(1): 85–99.

Kao C, Chiang M H and Chen B. 1999. International R&D spillovers: an application of estimation and inference in panel cointegration. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 691–709.

Kao C, Chiang M H. 2000. On the estimation and inference of a cointegrated regression in panel data. Advances in Econometrics, 15: 179–222.

Levin A, Lin C and Chu C. 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics, 108: 1–24.

Maddala G S, Wu S A. 1999. Comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61: 631–652.

Mark N, D Sul. 1999. Nominal exchange rates and monetary fundamentals: evidence from a small Post-Bretton woods panel. Journal of International Economics, 53 (1): 29–52.

Pasche M. 2002. Technical progress, structural change and the environmental kuznets curve. Ecological Economics, 42(2): 381–389.

Matthew A. 2004. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics, 48(1): 71–81.

Panayotou T. 1993. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. International Labor Office, Technology and Employment Programme, Working Paper.

Pedroni P. 1999. Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels. Working Paper, Indiana University.

Pedroni P. 2004. Panel cointegration: a symptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Economic Theory, 20: 597–625.

Peng S J, Bao Q. 2006. Economic growth and environmental pollution: an empirical test for the environmental kuznets curve hypothesis in China. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 8: 3–17. (in Chinese)

Muradian R, J Martinez. 2001. Trade and the environment. Ecological Economics, 36(2): 281–297.

Shen H M, Xu H Y. 2000. A new Environmentel Kuznets Curve. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 16(4): 53–57. (in Chinese)

Shen J Y. 2006. A simultaneous estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve: evidence from China. China Economic Review, 17: 383–394.

Song T, Zheng T G, Tong L J. 2007. Testing and analysis of the Chinese Environmental Kuznets Curve: evidence from panel unit root and panel cointegration tests. China Environmental Science, 27(4): 572–576. (in Chinese)

Brajer V, R W Mead, Feng X. 2008. Health benefits of tunneling through the Chinese Environmental Kuznets Curve. Ecological Economics, 66: 674–686.

Wu Y P, Dong S C, Song J F. 2002. Modeling economic growth and environmental degradation of Beijing. Geographical Research, 21(2): 239–246. (in Chinese)

Zhao X K, Li J M, Wang J Y and Zhou C Q. 2005. An empirical test of Environmental Kuznets Curve in China. Nankai Economic Studies, 3: 48–54. (in Chinese)