Journal of Resources and Ecology ›› 2021, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2): 143-154.DOI: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2021.02.002
• Land Use Efficiency • Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
2020-09-23
Accepted:
2020-11-25
Online:
2021-03-30
Published:
2021-05-30
Contact:
HE Yafen
About author:
SHI Jiaying, E-mail: skying1997@163.com
Supported by:
SHI Jiaying, HE Yafen. Evolution Characteristics of Urban Land Use Efficiency under Environmental Constraints in China[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 143-154.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.jorae.cn/EN/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2021.02.002
Indicator category | Primary indicators | Secondary indicators |
---|---|---|
Inputs | Capital | Fixed assets investment (104 yuan) |
Land | Built-up area (km2) | |
Labor force | Number of secondary industry employees (104 person) Number of tertiary industry employees (104 person) | |
Desirable outputs | Economic output | Added value of secondary and tertiary industries (104 yuan) |
Undesirable outputs | Environmental pollution | Industrial wastewater discharge (104 t) |
Industrial SO2 emission (t) | ||
Industrial dust emission (t) |
Table 1 Indicators for measuring urban land use efficiency
Indicator category | Primary indicators | Secondary indicators |
---|---|---|
Inputs | Capital | Fixed assets investment (104 yuan) |
Land | Built-up area (km2) | |
Labor force | Number of secondary industry employees (104 person) Number of tertiary industry employees (104 person) | |
Desirable outputs | Economic output | Added value of secondary and tertiary industries (104 yuan) |
Undesirable outputs | Environmental pollution | Industrial wastewater discharge (104 t) |
Industrial SO2 emission (t) | ||
Industrial dust emission (t) |
Region | Level | Number of cities in 2003 | Proportion(%) | Number of cities in 2008 | Proportion(%) | Number of cities in 2012 | Proportion(%) | Number of cities in 2016 | Proportion(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The East | Extremely low | 18 | 18.0 | 20 | 20.0 | 15 | 15.0 | 7 | 7.0 |
Low | 31 | 31.0 | 25 | 25.0 | 27 | 27.0 | 17 | 17.0 | |
Medium | 29 | 29.0 | 26 | 26.0 | 19 | 19.0 | 24 | 24.0 | |
High | 20 | 20.0 | 19 | 19.0 | 15 | 15.0 | 19 | 19.0 | |
Extremely high | 2 | 2.0 | 10 | 10.0 | 24 | 24.0 | 33 | 33.0 | |
The Central | Extremely low | 47 | 47.0 | 39 | 39.0 | 40 | 40.0 | 16 | 16.0 |
Low | 35 | 35.0 | 38 | 38.0 | 22 | 22.0 | 24 | 24.0 | |
Medium | 11 | 11.0 | 16 | 16.0 | 18 | 18.0 | 24 | 24.0 | |
High | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 4.0 | 10 | 10.0 | 20 | 20.0 | |
Extremely high | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 3.0 | 10 | 10.0 | 16 | 16.0 | |
The West | Extremely low | 39 | 52.0 | 25 | 33.3 | 18 | 24.0 | 8 | 10.7 |
Low | 22 | 29.3 | 21 | 28.0 | 23 | 30.7 | 16 | 21.3 | |
Medium | 10 | 13.3 | 17 | 22.7 | 10 | 13.3 | 26 | 34.7 | |
High | 3 | 4.0 | 8 | 10.7 | 12 | 16.0 | 13 | 17.3 | |
Extremely high | 1 | 1.3 | 4 | 5.3 | 12 | 16.0 | 12 | 16.0% |
Table 2 The proportion of urban land use efficiency grades in different regions in the four typical years
Region | Level | Number of cities in 2003 | Proportion(%) | Number of cities in 2008 | Proportion(%) | Number of cities in 2012 | Proportion(%) | Number of cities in 2016 | Proportion(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The East | Extremely low | 18 | 18.0 | 20 | 20.0 | 15 | 15.0 | 7 | 7.0 |
Low | 31 | 31.0 | 25 | 25.0 | 27 | 27.0 | 17 | 17.0 | |
Medium | 29 | 29.0 | 26 | 26.0 | 19 | 19.0 | 24 | 24.0 | |
High | 20 | 20.0 | 19 | 19.0 | 15 | 15.0 | 19 | 19.0 | |
Extremely high | 2 | 2.0 | 10 | 10.0 | 24 | 24.0 | 33 | 33.0 | |
The Central | Extremely low | 47 | 47.0 | 39 | 39.0 | 40 | 40.0 | 16 | 16.0 |
Low | 35 | 35.0 | 38 | 38.0 | 22 | 22.0 | 24 | 24.0 | |
Medium | 11 | 11.0 | 16 | 16.0 | 18 | 18.0 | 24 | 24.0 | |
High | 4 | 4.0 | 4 | 4.0 | 10 | 10.0 | 20 | 20.0 | |
Extremely high | 3 | 3.0 | 3 | 3.0 | 10 | 10.0 | 16 | 16.0 | |
The West | Extremely low | 39 | 52.0 | 25 | 33.3 | 18 | 24.0 | 8 | 10.7 |
Low | 22 | 29.3 | 21 | 28.0 | 23 | 30.7 | 16 | 21.3 | |
Medium | 10 | 13.3 | 17 | 22.7 | 10 | 13.3 | 26 | 34.7 | |
High | 3 | 4.0 | 8 | 10.7 | 12 | 16.0 | 13 | 17.3 | |
Extremely high | 1 | 1.3 | 4 | 5.3 | 12 | 16.0 | 12 | 16.0% |
1 | Chen J, Yang S T, Li H W , et al. 2013. Research on geographical environment unit division based on the method of natural breaks (Jenks). ISPRS—International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL- 4/W3:47-50. DOI: 10.5194/is prsarchives-XL-4-W3-47-2013. |
2 | Fan P F, Feng S Y, Su M , et al. 2018. Differential characteristics and driving factors of land use efficiency in different functional cities based on undesirable outputs. Resources Science, 40(5):946-957. (in Chinese) |
3 | Huang L, Wu C Q . 2019. Industrial green development efficiency and spatial driven mechanism in cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(8):40-49. (in Chinese) |
4 | Huang Z H, Du X J . 2018. Urban land expansion and air pollution: Evidence from China. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 144(4):05018017. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000476. |
5 | Jin G, Deng X Z, Zhao X D , et al. 2018. Spatio-temporal patterns of urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Zone during 2005-2014. Acta Geographica Sinica, 73(7):1242-1252. (in Chinese) |
6 | Li J, Hu B X, Kuang B , et al. 2017a. Measuring of urban land use efficiency and its dynamic development in China. Economic Geography, 37(8):162-167. (in Chinese) |
7 | Li L, Dong J, Zhang J F . 2018. Regional difference and formation mechanism of urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 27(8):1665-1675. (in Chinese) |
8 | Li W B, Wang D Y, Wang Q , et al. 2017b. Impacts from land use pattern on spatial distribution of cultivated soil heavy metal pollution in typical rural-urban fringe of northeast China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3):336. DOI: 10.3390/ijerp h14030336. |
9 | Li Y L, Shu B R, Wu Q . 2014. Urban land use efficiency in China: Spatial and temporal characteristics, regional difference and influence factors. Economic Geography, 34(1):133-139. (in Chinese) |
10 | Liang L T, Yong Y J, Yuan C G . 2019. Measurement of urban land green use efficiency and its spatial differentiation characteristics: An empirical study based on 284 cities. China Land Science, 33(6):80-87. (in Chinese) |
11 | Liu H J, Qiao L C, Sun S H . 2020. Spatial distribution and dynamic change of water use efficiency in the Yellow River Basin. Resources Science, 42(1):57-68. (in Chinese) |
12 | Liu Y S, Zhang Z W, Zhou Y . 2018. Efficiency of construction land allocation in China: An econometric analysis of panel data. Land Use Policy, 74:261-272. |
13 | Lu X H, Chen D L, Kuang B . 2018a. Coupling effect of industrial integration and urban land use efficiency: Taking the urban agglomeration of the central reaches of the Yangtze River as a case. China Land Science, 32(9):66-73. (in Chinese) |
14 | Lu X H, Chen D L, Kuang B . 2018b. Indicator system design and regional difference of urban land use efficiency under the background of regional integration: A case of urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River. China Population, Resources and Environment, 28(7):102-110. (in Chinese) |
15 | Lu X H, Kuang B, Zhou M . 2016. Spatial inequality and influencing factors of utilization efficiency of urban construction land. China Population, Resources and Environment, 26(11):45-52. (in Chinese) |
16 | Majumdar D D, Biswas A . 2016. Quantifying land surface temperature change from LISA clusters: An alternative approach to identifying urban land use transformation. Landscape & Urban Planning, 153:51-65. |
17 |
Masini E, Tomao A, Barbati A , et al. 2019. Urban growth, land-use efficiency and local socioeconomic context: A comparative analysis of 417 metropolitan regions in Europe. Environmental Management, 63(3):322-337.
DOI URL PMID |
18 | Pastor J T, Lovell C A K . 2005. A global Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 88(2):266-271. |
19 | Tone K . 2001. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3):498-509. |
20 | Xie H L, Wang W, Yao G R , et al. 2015a. Spatiotemporal differences and convergence of urban industrial land use efficiency for China’s major economic zones. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(8):1327-1338. (in Chinese) |
21 | Xie H L, Wang W . 2015b. Exploring the spatial-temporal disparities of urban land use economic efficiency in China and its influencing factors under environmental constraints based on a sequential slacks-based model. Sustainability, 7(8):10171-10190. |
22 | Yang Q K, Duan X J, Ye L , et al. 2014. Efficiency evaluation of city land utilization in the Yangtze River Delta using a SBM-undesirable model. Resources Science, 36(4):712-721. (in Chinese) |
23 | Yang X F, Dai Z Y, Tian S R . 2017. Research on spatiotemporal development and coupling of urbanization and urban land use efficiency: Taking the middle reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration as an example. Geomatics & Spatial Information Technology, 40(10):102-104. (in Chinese) |
24 | Yu J Q, Zhou K L, Yang S L . 2019. Land use efficiency and influencing factors of urban agglomerations in China. Land Use Policy, 88:104143. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104143. |
25 | Zhang L X, Zhu D L, Du T , et al. 2017. Spatiotemporal pattern evolvement and driving factors of urban construction land use efficiency using data envelopment analysis. Resources Science, 39(3):418-429. (in Chinese) |
26 | Zhang W X, Wu Q, Wang B , et al. 2019b. Multidimensional study of specialized agglomeration and diversified agglomeration on urban land use efficiency. China Population, Resources and Environment, 29(11):100-110. (in Chinese) |
27 | Zhang Y H, Chen J L, Gao J L , et al. 2019a. The impact mechanism of urban land use efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta from the perspective of economic transition. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(6):1157-1170. (in Chinese) |
28 | Zhang Z H . 2014. Study of Chinese urban land use efficiency. The Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 31(7):134-149. (in Chinese) |
29 | Zhang Z X, Wen Q K, Liu F , et al. 2016. Urban expansion in China and its effect on cultivated land before and after initiating “Reform and Open Policy”. Science China Earth Sciences, 59(10):1930-1945. |
30 | Zhao K, Xu T Q, Li P , et al. 2015. Disparities and convergence of land productivity of different scale cities: Based on panel data of 265 cities in China. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 29(12):1-6. (in Chinese) |
31 | Zhao X F, Lou J J, Huang X J , et al. 2017. Research progress in urban land use efficiency. Modern Urban Research about Urban Land Intensive Use, ( 6):2-8. (in Chinese) |
32 | Zhou Y, He C F, Huang Z J , et al. 2013. Geography and urban land use efficiency: Empirical study based on panel data of 277 Chinese cities during 2004-2008. Urban Development Studies, 20(7):19-25, 56. (in Chinese) |
33 | Zhou Y, Huang X J, Xu G L , et al. 2016. The coupling and driving forces between urban land expansion and population growth in Yangtze River Delta. Geographical Research, 35(2):313-324. (in Chinese) |
34 | Zhu X H, Zhang P F, Wei Y G , et al. 2019. Measuring the efficiency and driving factors of urban land use based on the DEA method and the PLS-SEM model—A case study of 35 large and medium-sized cities in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 50:101646. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101646. |
No related articles found! |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||