Evaluation of Water Yield and Soil Erosion in the Three-River-Source Region under Different Land-Climate Sce-narios

doi:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2020.01.002

Abstract

Abstract: Exploring the water yield and soil conservation in the Three-River-Source region is of great significance for evaluating both the ecological stability of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Yellow River basin, Yangtze River basin and Lancang River basin and the sustainable development of human society. The data sources for this study were land use/cover data from four phases (2000, 2005, 2010 and 2015), daily precipitation and temperature datasets, and the 1:1000000 Chinese soil database. These data were combined with vector data, such as data on settlements, roads, and rivers, along with population, economic raster datasets and CCSM4 common climate model prediction results. The Three-River-Source region was taken as the study area, and four land use/cover development scenarios and two climate change scenarios were designed based on the FLUS model and the downscaling correction method. The InVEST model was used to quantitatively simulate the water yield and soil erosion under different scenarios in the study area in 2030. The results showed the following: (1) Under different land use/cover development scenarios, grassland remained the dominant land use/cover type in the Three-River-Source region, and the area ratio was always greater than 67%. (2) Under the RCP4.5 climate scenario, the annual water yield and soil erosion increased by more than 7% and 3.9%, respectively. Under the RCP8.5 climate scenario, the annual water yield and soil erosion decreased by more than 3.3% and 1.3%, respectively. (3) Climate change played a leading role in the changes in water yield and soil erosion. Climate change contributed as much as 89.97%–98.00% to the change in water yield and 60.49%–95.64% to the change in the soil erosion modulus. However, the contribution of land use/cover changes to the change in regional water yield was only 2.00%–10.03%, and the contribution of the soil erosion modulus change was 4.36%–39.91%. Therefore, the land use development strategy in the Three-River-Source region should comprehensively consider issues such as regional development, the input of returning farmland to forest and grassland, and the resulting ecological benefits.

Key words: ecosystem services, scenario simulation, regional water yield, soil erosion, trade-off

GAO Min, XIAO Yan, HU Yunfeng. Evaluation of Water Yield and Soil Erosion in the Three-River-Source Region under Different Land-Climate Sce-narios[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(1): 13-26.

References

1 Bagstad K J, Villa F, Batker D, et al.2014. From theoretical to actual ecosystem services: Mapping beneficiaries and spatial flows in ecosystem service assessments. Ecology and Society, 19(2): 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06523-190264.
2 Bogdan S M, Patru-Stupariu I, Zaharia L.2016. The assessment of regulatory ecosystem services: the case of the sediment retention service in a mountain landscape in the Southern Romanian Carpathians.Procedia Environmental Sciences, 32: 12-27.
3 Cai C F, Ding S W, Shi Z H, et al.2000. Study of applying USLE and Geographical Information System IDRISI to predict soil erosion in Small Watershed. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 14(2): 19-24. (in Chinese)
4 Cao W, Liu L L, Wu D.2018. Soil erosion changes and driving factors in the Three-River Headwaters region. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 27(6): 10-22. (in Chinese)
5 Chen Q, Wu W Z, Zhou Q, et al.2010. Synthesis analysis of soil erosion for Three-River Headwater Region based on GIS. Agricultural Science & Technology, 11(5): 155-158.
6 Dai Z X, Hu Y F, Zhao G H.2017. The suitability of different nighttime light data for GDP estimation at different spatial scales and regional levels. Sustainability, 9(2): 305-320.
7 Du B Z, Zhen L, Hu Y F, et al.2018. Comparison of ecosystem services provided by grasslands with different utilization patterns in China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(10): 1399-1414.
8 Fortnam M, Brown K, Chaigneau T, et al.2019. The Gendered Nature of Ecosystem Services. Ecological Economics, 159: 312-325.
9 Fu B J, Zhang L W, Xu Z H, et al.2015. Ecosystem services in changing land use. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 15(4): 833-843.
10 He C Y, Zhang D, Huang Q X, et al.2016. Assessing the potential impacts of urban expansion on regional carbon storage by linking the LUSD-urban and InVEST models. Environmental Modelling & Software, 75: 44-58.
11 Jiang C, Zhang L B.2016. Ecosystem change assessment in the Three-river Headwater Region, China: Patterns, causes, and implications. Ecological Engineering, 93:24-36.
12 Jiang S, Jiang Z, Li W, et al.2017. Evaluation of the extreme temperature and its trend in China simulated by CMIP5 Models. Progressus Inquisitiones de Mutatione Climatis, 13(1):11-24. (in Chinese)
13 Li L H, Bai L, Yao Y N, et al.2012. Projection of Climate Change in Xinjiang under IPCC SRES. Resources Science, 34(4): 602-612. (in Chinese)
14 Li X, Chen G Z, Liu X P, et al.2017. A new global land-use and land-cover change product at a 1-km resolution for 2010 to 2100 based on human-environment interactions. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 107(5): 1040-1059.
15 Liang X, Liu X P, Li X, et al.2018. Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177: 47-63.
16 Lin H L, Zheng S T, Wang X L.2017. Soil erosion assessment based on the RUSLE model in the Three-Rivers Headwaters area, Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 26(7): 11-22. (in Chinese)
17 Liu J Y, Xu X L, Shao Q Q.2008. The spatial and temporal characteristics of grassland degradation in the Three-River Headwaters Region in Qinghai Province. Acta Geographica Sinica, 63(4): 364-376. (in Chinese)
18 Liu X P, Liang X, Li X, et al.2017. A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landscape and Urban Planning, 168: 94-116.
19 Martins M A, Tomasella J, Dias C G.2019. Maize yield under a changing climate in the Brazilian Northeast: Impacts and adaptation. Agricultural Water Management, 216: 339-350.
20 Osburn L, Keay K, Catto J L.2018. Projected change in wintertime precipitation in California using projected changes in extratropical cyclone activity. Journal of Climate, 31(9): 3451-3466.
21 Pan M H, Wu Y Q, Ren F P, et al.2010. Estimating soil erosion in the Dongjiang river basin based on USLE. Journal of Natural Resources, 25(12): 2154-2164. (in Chinese)
22 Pan T, Wu S H, Dai E F, et al.2013. Spatiotemporal variation of water source supply service in Three Rivers Source Area of China based on InVEST model.Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 24(1): 183-189. (in Chinese)
23 Pessacg N, Flaherty S, Brandizi L, et al.2015. Getting water right: A case study in water yield modelling based on precipitation data. Science of the Total Environment, 537: 225-234.
24 Rolo V, Moreno G.2019. Shrub encroachment and climate change increase the exposure to drought of Mediterranean wood-pastures. Science of the Total Environment, 660: 550-558.
25 Shao Q Q, Fan J W, Liu J Y, et al.2017. Target-based assessment on effects of first-stage ecological conservation and restoration project in Three-river Source Region: China and Policy Recommendations. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 32(1): 35-44. (in Chinese)
26 Sherrouse B C, Clement J M, Semmens D J.2011. A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services. Applied Geography, 31(2): 748-760.
27 Sherrouse B C, Semmens D J, Clement J M.2014. An application of Social Values for Ecosystem Services (SolVES) to three national forests in Colorado and Wyoming. Ecological Indicators, 36: 68-79.
28 Srivastava A, Sahoo B, Raghuwanshi N S, et al.2018. Modelling the dynamics of evapotranspiration using Variable Infiltration Capacity model and regionally calibrated Hargreaves approach. Irrigation Science, 36(4-5): 289-300.
29 Sun W Y, Shao Q Q, Liu J Y, et al.2014. Assessing the effects of land use and topography on soil erosion on the Loess Plateau in China. Catena, 121: 151-163.
30 Tabor K, Williams J W.2010. Globally downscaled climate projections for assessing the conservation impacts of climate change. Ecological Applications, 20(2): 554-565.
31 Thellmann K, Golbon R, Cotter M, et al.2019. Assessing hydrological ecosystem services in a rubber-dominated watershed under scenarios of land use and climate change. Forests, 10(2): 176.
32 Tuhovcak L, Kucera T, Suchacek T.2018. Technical auditing of water supply systems—part 1: the complex methodology. Water Science and Technology-Water Supply, 18(4): 1133-1140.
33 Vigerstol K L, Aukema J E.2011. A comparison of tools for modeling freshwater ecosystem services. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(10): 2403-2409.
34 Wang J Z, Zhang Q, Gou T J, et al.2018. Spatial-temporal changes of urban areas and terrestrial carbon storage in the Three Gorges Reservoir in China. Ecological Indicators, 95: 343-352.
35 Williams J R, Jones C A, Dyke P T.1984. A modeling approach to determining the relationship between erosion and soil productivity. Transactions of the ASAE, 27(1): 129-144.
36 Wu D, Shao Q Q, Liu J Y, et al.2016. Assessment of water regulation service of forest and grassland ecosystems in Three-River Headwaters Region. Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation, 36(3): 206-210. (in Chinese)
37 Xu X B, Yang G S, Tan Y, et al.2018. Ecosystem services trade-offs and determinants in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015. Science of the Total Environment, 634: 1601-1614.
38 Yang D, Liu W, Tang L Y, et al.2019. Estimation of water provision service for monsoon catchments of south China: Applicability of the InVEST model. Landscape and Urban Planning, 182:133-143.
39 Zhao M M, He Z B, Du J, et al.2019. Assessing the effects of ecological engineering on carbon storage by linking the CA-Markov and InVEST models. Ecological Indicators, 98: 29-38.
40 Zheng F Y, Hu Y C.2018. Assessing temporal-spatial land use simulation effects with CLUE-S and Markov-CA models in Beijing. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(32): 32231-32245.
41 Zhong S Z, Geng Y, Qian Y Y, et al.2019. Analyzing ecosystem services of freshwater lakes and their driving forces: the case of Erhai Lake, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(10): 10219-10229.
42 Zhou W Z, Liu G H, Pan J J, et al.2005. Distribution of available soil water capacity in China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 15(1): 3-12.
43 Zorita E, von Storch H.1999. The analog method as a simple statistical downscaling technique: Comparison with more complicated methods. Journal of Climate, 12(8): 2474-2489.

[1]	XIE Hualin, CHEN Qianru. Land Use and Ecological Civilization: A Collection of Empirical Studies [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 137-142.
[2]	CHEN Qianru, XIE Hualin. Research Progress and Discoveries Related to Cultivated Land Abandonment [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 165-174.
[3]	FENG Yanyun, ZHAO Yuluan, YANG Zhimou, XUE Chaolang, LIU Yan. Spatio-temporal Differentiation of Trade-offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Typical Mountain Areas of China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(2): 268-279.
[4]	LI Qing, ZHOU Yong, Mary Ann CUNNINGHAM, XU Tao. Spatio-temporal Changes in Wildlife Habitat Quality in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River from 1980 to 2100 based on the InVEST Model [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2021, 12(1): 43-55.
[5]	CAI Shizhen, ZHANG Xuliang, CAO Yinghui, ZHANG Zhaohui, WANG Wei. Values of the Farmland Ecosystem Services of Qingdao City, China, and their Changes [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2020, 11(5): 443-453.
[6]	ZHEN Lin, XU Zengrang, ZHAO Yuan, WANG Jijun, HU Yunfeng, WANG Juanle. Ecological Carrying Capacity and Green Development in the “Belt and Road” Initiative Region [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 569-573.
[7]	ZHANG Changshun, ZHEN Lin, LIU Chunlan, LIANG Yihang. Research on the Patterns and Evolution of Ecosystem Service Consumption in the “Belt and Road” [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 621-631.
[8]	LIANG Yihang, ZHEN Lin, JIA Mengmeng, HU Yunfeng, ZHANG Changshun, LUO Qi. Consumption of Ecosystem Services in Laos [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(6): 641-648.
[9]	WANG Zhao, WANG Junbang. Changes of Soil Erosion and Possible Impacts from Ecosystem Recovery in the Three-River Headwaters Region, Qinghai, China from 2000 to 2015 [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(5): 461-471.
[10]	WU Baiqiu,WANG Junbang,QI Shuhua,WANG Shaoqiang,LI Yingnian. Review of Methods to Quantify Trade-offs among Ecosystem Services and Future Model Developments [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(2): 225-233.
[11]	BAO Yingshuang,CHENG Leilei,LU Qi. Assessment of Desert Ecological Assets and Countermeasures for Ecological Compensation [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(1): 56-62.
[12]	LIN Yongsheng,GUO Zhixin,ZHENG Yaomin,ZHANG Lirong,HUANG Huabing. Net Horizontal Payments for Ecosystem Services: An Application in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region of China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2019, 10(1): 63-68.
[13]	WANG Shanshan, SUN Baoyang, LI Chaodong, LI Zhanbin, MA Bo. Runoff and Soil Erosion on Slope Cropland: A Review [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(5): 461-470.
[14]	DU Wenpeng, YAN Huimin, YANG Yanzhao, LIU Fang. Evaluation Methods and Research Trends for Ecological Carrying Capacity [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(2): 115-124.
[15]	WANG Mingkuan, MO Hongwei. The Impact of Spatial Heterogeneity on Ecosystem Service Value in a Case Study in Liuyang River Basin, China [J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2018, 9(2): 209-217.