Adamowicz W, J Louviere, M Williams. 1994. Combining revealed and stated preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26(3):271-292.Alpizar F, F Carlsson, P Martinsson. 2001. Using choice experiments for non-market valuation. Department of Economics Göteborg University, Working Papers in Economics.Brouwer R, T Dekker, J Rolfe, J Windle. 2010. Choice certainty and consistency in repeated choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46:93-109.Cai Y Y, ChenY, Ren Y S, et al. 2008. Measuring agricultural land's non-market values of urban leisure agriculture. Resources Science, 30(2):305-313. (in Chinese)Carlsson F, M Kataria, E Lampi . 2010. Dealing with ignored attributes in choice experiments on valuation of Sweden's environmental quality objectives. Environmental and Resource Economics, 47:65-89.Espinosa M, J Barreiro-Hurlé, E Ruto. 2010. What do farmers want from agri-environmental scheme design? a choice experiment approach. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 61(2):259-273.Ferrini S, R Scarpa. 2007. Designs with a priori information for nonmarket valuation with choice experiments: a Monte Carlo study. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 53:342-363.Hanley N, R E Wright, B Alvarez-Farizo. 2006. Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive. Journal of Environmental Management, 78:183-193.Jin J J, Wang Z S. 2006. Choice experiment method and its application to solid waste management in Macao. Environmental Science, 27(4): 820-825. (in Chinese)Jin J J, Wang Z S. 2005. Economic valuation of solid waste management in Macao. China Environmental Science, 25(6):751-755. (in Chinese)Lancaster K. 1966. A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 77:132-157.Ma A H, Zhang A L. 2013. Cultivated land ecological compensation willingness based on choice experiments. Resources Science, 35(10):2067-2074.Ma A H, Cai Y Y, Zhang A L. 2012. An empirial study of cultivated land ecological compensation based on choice experiments method. Journal of Natural Resources, 27(7):1154-1164. (in Chinese)Mazotta M and J Opaluch. 1995. Decision making when choices are complex: a test of Heiners hypothesis. Land Economics, 71:500-515.Mørkbak M R, T Christensen and D Gyrd-Hansen. 2010. Choke price bias in choice experiments. Environmental and Resource Economics, 45:537-551.Rambonilaza M, J Dachary-Bernard. 2007. Land-use planning and public preferences: what can we learn from choice experiment method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 83: 318-326.Swait J and W Adamowicz. 1996. The effect of choice experiment and task demands on consumer behavior: Discriminating between contribution and confusion. Department of Resource Economics and Environmental Sociology, University of Alberta, Staff Paper Series 24091.Travisi C M, P Nijkamp. 2008. Valuing environmental and health risk in agriculture: a choice experiment approach to pesticides in Italy. Ecological Economics, 67:598-607.Xu Z M, Zhang Z Q, Long A H, et al. 2003. Choice modeling and its potential application to ecosystem management. Acta Geographica Sinica, 58(3):398-405. (in Chinese)Xu Z, Fang T, Song Q, et al. 2005. The application of conjoint analysis on development and test of new product concept. Quantity Statistics and Management, 24(6):25-32. (in Chinese)Zhai G L, Zhang S Q, K Andreas, et al. 2007. Theory and practice of choice experiment: a case study on china's sloping land conversion program. Journal of Beijing University: Natural Science Edition, 43(2):235-239. (in Chinese)Zhang L, J Bennett, Dai G C, et al. 2008. Cost-benefit analysis on the program for conversion of cropland to forestland in China. Beijing: Economic Science Press, 7. (in Chinese) |